Re: [OSM-dev] .pbf files

2011-01-31 Thread Scott Crosby
Osmosis uses densenode by default, but can optionally use node messages. I know of no other implementations of a pbf file writer. On Jan 31, 2011 8:49 AM, "Chris Hill" wrote: I have been experimenting with the binary format .pbf files. Does anyone who creates .pbf files use the Node message or

Re: [OSM-dev] Potlatch2 - ways all unrecognised?

2011-01-31 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar
I cleared my cache (Flash and browser) on both Firefox and Chrome but the problem persists. Actually, I'm not sure if the problem I'm having is the same as others. Basically, no OSM data is displayed (or visible). When I drop POI icons to the map, they shrink and disappear. The same thing happens

Re: [OSM-dev] Potlatch2 - ways all unrecognised?

2011-01-31 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: > Doesn't work for me. But I note that the deployed version is > rev25177 while the latest is rev25202. If you're still having problems then try flushing your cache. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Potlatch2-ways-all

Re: [OSM-dev] Potlatch2 - ways all unrecognised?

2011-01-31 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar
Doesn't work for me. But I note that the deployed version is rev25177 while the latest is rev25202. On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Colin Smale wrote: > It is fixed now, in v25177. Thanks! > > Colin > > On 29/01/2011 12:21, Richard Fairhurst wrote: >> >> Colin Smale wrote: >>> >>> I have been u

[OSM-dev] .pbf files

2011-01-31 Thread Chris Hill
I have been experimenting with the binary format .pbf files. Does anyone who creates .pbf files use the Node message or just the DenseNodes message? -- Cheers, Chris user: chillly ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetma

Re: [OSM-dev] Error While Installing osm2pgsql

2011-01-31 Thread Sven Geggus
Frederik Ramm wrote: > There may be breakage on Debian as well but I've only witnessed on > Ubuntu. Version 25081 does compile just fine in Debian lenny (hopefully oldstable after next weekend) and squeeze (hopefully stable after next weekend). So this looks like a Ubuntu only bug. Sven -- Mi

Re: [OSM-dev] Little doubt about planet updates

2011-01-31 Thread Stephan Plepelits
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:30:13AM -0800, Juan Lucas Domínguez Rubio wrote: > Hello, I have downloaded this file: > > http://planet.openstreetmap.org/planet-110119.osm.bz2 > contains the changes performed during the [date] day (UTC time), therefore > the first file I should use in my case would b

[OSM-dev] Little doubt about planet updates

2011-01-31 Thread Juan Lucas Domínguez Rubio
Hello, I have downloaded this file: http://planet.openstreetmap.org/planet-110119.osm.bz2 which according to [1] contains all data in the OSM DB as of: 19.01.201 01.00 AM UTC (UK time = UTC) My intention is to apply daily updates to it. According to this timestamp.txt file [2], a file called: