Re: [OSM-dev] Removing functionality and giving just No as answer

2017-03-08 Thread Yves
It's like the close door button in an elevator, you know it usually does not speed things up, but it feels good to press it anyway. Yves Le 8 mars 2017 13:03:32 GMT+01:00, Tom Hughes a écrit : >On 08/03/17 09:35, joost schouppe wrote: > >> While a lot of the comments are a

Re: [OSM-dev] Removing functionality and giving just No as answer

2017-03-08 Thread Tom Hughes
On 08/03/17 09:35, joost schouppe wrote: While a lot of the comments are a bit misguided, I think it is clear that quite a few mappers use this dirty trick to get the render to refresh. As OSM.org is supposed to be a mapper's tool and not a general public website, I think it is quite obvious

Re: [OSM-dev] Removing functionality and giving just No as answer

2017-03-08 Thread joost schouppe
Just to clarify, Tom, would the example given by mmd ( http://www.sammyshp.de/fsmap/#18/51.01486/13.63683) be something you would deem acceptable in osm.org? BTW, one of the places where people were "canvasing" was here: