On 20/02/18 21:16, Paul Norman wrote:
The data loss potential is very minimal, particularly since anything
that brings down the DB server is likely to cause much larger
interruptions to mapping than the loss of 5 seconds of PostgreSQL
replication.
I'd also point out that the data loss risk
On 2/20/2018 12:07 PM, Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski wrote:
This suggests that currently apidb replicas aren't in synchronous
mode. Can it be switched to synchronous?
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/warm-standby.html#SYNCHRONOUS-REPLICATION
Given the absolutely miserable
>
> There's no guarantee that the read-only changeset call will go to the same
> backend server as the write call.
> https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/1646 shows the problem caused
> by iD not parsing the diff response and relying on redownloading.
>
This suggests that currently apidb
On 2/20/2018 2:56 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 20.02.2018 10:51, Michał Brzozowski wrote:
You can use changeset replication with ChangesetMD to query your own DB.
I was tempted to respond the same, but I imagine the idea is that as
soon as the user clicks on the "I have fixed this" button,
IMHO it boils down to one extra API call per edit made in a maproulette
context(on top of a minimum of two API calls (if the editor is doing
things properly that is actually three), so likely it is simply a bit of
added noise, depending on how expensive
Hi,
On 20.02.2018 10:51, Michał Brzozowski wrote:
> You can use changeset replication with ChangesetMD to query your own DB.
I was tempted to respond the same, but I imagine the idea is that as
soon as the user clicks on the "I have fixed this" button, MapRoulette
checks what has been
You can use changeset replication with ChangesetMD to query your own DB.
Michał
20.02.2018 01:45 "Martijn van Exel" napisał(a):
> Hi,
>
> We’re thinking about adding task completion validation to MapRoulette. The
> basic premise is this: a user completes a task in MapRoulette,
7 matches
Mail list logo