Re: [OSM-dev] GSOC Project: "Make the website use the API"

2018-03-01 Thread Andy Allan
On 2 March 2018 at 04:43, Paul Norman wrote: > I wrote a blog post on how to get started with the API projects: > http://paulnorman.ca/blog/2018/02/make-the-website-use-the-api-gsoc-project/ > > I recommend steps 2, 4, and 5 for anyone applying for a project which > interacts

Re: [osmosis-dev] Osmosis and Osmium-enhanced PBF files with way node locations

2018-03-01 Thread Locke, Jonathan
Hi Brett, >From our perspective, it's definitely worth adding this feature because we use >OsmosisReader in a host of custom Java applications (dozens of them). I think >at this point, Osmosis code is running on our servers 24/7/365 doing various >kinds of back-end processing for different

Re: [OSM-dev] ID presets problem

2018-03-01 Thread NopMap
I was testing the option to include GPX tracks in the map and I noted that the layer is shown* in front of the* OSM data. I would have expected the GPX track to be behind the OSM data so it is not obscured and you can easily draw your ways on top of the GPX track. Potlatch2 does it this way. Is

[OSM-dev] GSoC project inquiry

2018-03-01 Thread Thomas Hervey
Hello OSM Dev list, My name is Thomas Hervey. I am a third year GIS Ph.D. student at UC Santa Barbara researching geographic information retrieval and spatial cognition. One aspect of my research involves exploring how the structure of open tools (like OSM) help contribute to more intuitive ways

Re: [OSM-dev] GSOC Project: "Make the website use the API"

2018-03-01 Thread Paul Norman
I wrote a blog post on how to get started with the API projects: http://paulnorman.ca/blog/2018/02/make-the-website-use-the-api-gsoc-project/ I recommend steps 2, 4, and 5 for anyone applying for a project which interacts with the API. On 2/13/2018 9:08 AM, IMT2016050 Biswesh Mohapatra

Re: [OSM-dev] ID presets problem

2018-03-01 Thread NopMap
Bryan Housel wrote > Somebody made: > https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/pull/3140 > https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/pull/3140; > which I probably would have just accepted if it didn’t conflict with the > existing "selected" style. > (whatever we do needs to look and feel different than how