On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:25:57 +, Valent Turkovic wrote:
Hi, just posted bug for PicLayer:
http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/5338
Could somebody please confirm that this bug is posted ok because this is
my first time to post to JOSM Track.
Thank you Tomasz Stelmach for this great
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:47:50 +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
even with loads of feedback they are not able to update their maps in
time (it takes them years to check and correct already known errors).
Agreed, but I would still like tools for people to report bug to me so I
can fix issues.
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:19:12 +, Tom Hughes wrote:
pointless little diatribe. I do help it made you feel better.
What are you on about?
--
pratite me na twitteru - www.twitter.com/valentt
blog: http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com
linux, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless, ronjenje,
On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:31:18 +0100, Andy Robinson \(blackadder-lists\)
wrote:
And my rule of thumb is if a tractor uses it it's a track, this is
basically the same assumption as a 4x4 off road usage. Otherwise it's
something else, normally a footway/path etc if narrower. So, two ruts
it's a
On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:18:06 +0200, Tobias Wendorff wrote:
Perhaps my understanding of security is mistaken, but this is the way,
how *I* would do it:
I hope some people reply in order to make this a reality and make all OSM
users safer.
--
pratite me na twitteru - www.twitter.com/valentt
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:49:00 +, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
On OSM.org you can give out tokens that allow the holder to *only* edit
the map data. As opposed to also getting access to your private GPX
tracks, making diary entries / comments etc.
So transfering plaintext OAuth tokens
On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:18:06 +0200, Tobias Wendorff wrote:
sorry, I can't find the original thread about the problem that JOSM
transfers passwords unprotected to the server...
Here you go:
http://www.nabble.com/shocking---unsecure-password-sending!-
td25593349.html
--
pratite me na
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:25:29 +, Valent Turkovic wrote:
Hi, I have noticed that Potlach assigns wrong tags for dirt dirt
track.
When you select dirt track potlach adds highway=track and surface=dirt
tags. That wouldn't be an issue if the icon beside it wouldn't be man
walking
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:49:43 +0200, Tobias Wendorff wrote:
A token gets gets generated on the database server (or transmitted to
it) and it gets transmitted to the user via HTTPS.
The token will encode the password on the user's side and transmit it in
plaintext to the server. The server
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:18:17 +0200, Stefan Baebler wrote:
There are open tickets about ssl and encrypting passwords:
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/275
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/106
I see these are 4 years old tickets :(
How far is it from realization so that we start using
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:25:36 +0200, GeoJ wrote:
May be the HTTP digest authentication would be an alternative (or a
similar approach)? It uses a clear-text challenge-response protocol that
does not require SSL but protects the password.
Will this be incorporated in some future version of
Hi, I have noticed that Potlach assigns wrong tags for dirt dirt track.
When you select dirt track potlach adds highway=track and surface=dirt
tags. That wouldn't be an issue if the icon beside it wouldn't be man
walking. There should be a car icon instead of man walking or the tag
should be
Hi,
there have been some talk about hiding big edits in changeset history,
is there a plan to implement this feature soon?
Thank you very much for your excellent work.
Cheers from Croatia,
Valent.
--
pratite me na twitteru - www.twitter.com/valentt
http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/
linux,
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 18:49:26 +0200, Pieren wrote:
I don't think it is a good idea. If you do so, we will not see anymore
some potential issues like bots (see another thread) or vandalism.
The area size is irrelevant and should be completely ignored.
What I would like to know if anybody edited
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:14:31 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Yes. This would be a good service for an *external* service to offer. It
Why only for external service? I believe that this is crucial for
monitoring because of vandalism and for watching newbies that usually
make lots of mistakes.
Is
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:14:31 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
is a bit expensive to compute, and the bounding box offered by the API
is just meant to be a quick index that gives you an idea of which
changesets could be relevant to the bbox you are looking at.
I thought about one more thing, ok, so
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:39:35 +0100, Shaun McDonald wrote:
Have you tried the ITOWorld OSMapper service?
Yes I have, the issue is that OSMapper has a delay of on week ;(
If that would be live data than it would be great!
As you can see here:
http://www.itoworld.com/product/osm/feed?
17 matches
Mail list logo
