Dne neděle 16 Leden 2011 03:25:27 Frederik Ramm napsal(a):
Ideally of course there would be a library that does all the
metatile stuff (computing paths and so on) used by everyone, but that's
maybe too hard because it would have to be usable from so many different
places.
+1
--
Ing. Radek
On 16.01.2011 20:11, Jon Burgess wrote:
Does anyone use the existing scheme with max_zoom 18? If not the
changes could only effect higher zooms, perhaps as a compatibility mode.
I do with zoom 19. And until a few minutes ago I felt fine doing it.
Now I feel confused.
Stephan
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 20:25:55 +0100, Stephan Knauss wrote:
On 16.01.2011 20:11, Jon Burgess wrote:
Does anyone use the existing scheme with max_zoom 18? If not the
changes could only effect higher zooms, perhaps as a compatibility mode.
I do with zoom 19. And until a few minutes ago I
Hi,
Stephan Knauss wrote:
On 16.01.2011 20:11, Jon Burgess wrote:
Does anyone use the existing scheme with max_zoom 18? If not the
changes could only effect higher zooms, perhaps as a compatibility mode.
I do with zoom 19. And until a few minutes ago I felt fine doing it.
Now I feel
On 16.01.2011 22:40, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Had it turned out that nobody uses zoom levels 18, then it would havew
been easy to define x=18, and implement a new scheme that comes into
play for tiles on zoom levels 19+.
I wouldn't mind to throw away my existing Z19 tiles. It's not that many
What is the best way to delete metatiles in a given bounding box and zoom?
I'm using mod_tile and tirex.
In case it's not existing: Should it be added to tirex-batch? I like the
filers and stuff tirex-batch already have. Even when I not need it, it
could prove usefull for others.
Stephan
Hi,
Stephan Knauss wrote:
What is the best way to delete metatiles in a given bounding box and zoom?
I'm using mod_tile and tirex.
In case it's not existing: Should it be added to tirex-batch? I like the
filers and stuff tirex-batch already have. Even when I not need it, it
could prove
7 matches
Mail list logo
