Re: [OSM-dev] Josm bug: deleted nodes cause conflicts

2009-09-29 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 7:21 AM, malenki o...@malenki.ch wrote: But what I maybe did not express well enough was: how can the MUA decide if the CC-to/Send-to duplicate should be removed or the duplicate from ML? Sometimes there are even triplikates (can one call that so?) sent... One of the

Re: [OSM-dev] Josm bug: deleted nodes cause conflicts

2009-09-29 Thread John Smith
2009/9/29 Martijn van Oosterhout klep...@gmail.com: One of the popular options these days for people who don't like duplicates, is to tick the kill duplicates option in the mailing list configuration. That way each user can decide for themselves whether they want duplicates or not. It's a

Re: [OSM-dev] Josm bug: deleted nodes cause conflicts

2009-09-29 Thread Matthias Julius
Martijn van Oosterhout klep...@gmail.com writes: On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 7:21 AM, malenki o...@malenki.ch wrote: But what I maybe did not express well enough was: how can the MUA decide if the CC-to/Send-to duplicate should be removed or the duplicate from ML? Sometimes there are even

Re: [OSM-dev] Josm bug: deleted nodes cause conflicts

2009-09-28 Thread malenki
Am Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:25:35 -0400 schrieb Matthias Julius li...@julius-net.net: malenki o...@malenki.ch writes: This debate will never end and is therefore pointless. I doubt you will convince many people to switch to a different MUA just to spare you from duplicates. This was from

Re: [OSM-dev] Josm bug: deleted nodes cause conflicts

2009-09-28 Thread Mike N.
But I still don't know why they shouldn't be able to remove all the adresses except the list-adress when using reply-to-all. Carelessness, lazyness, ignorance, stubborness..? It's a mix of all of the above.Everyone is inconvenienced to some degree with the current situation ; it's just a

Re: [OSM-dev] Josm bug: deleted nodes cause conflicts

2009-09-26 Thread malenki
Am Sat, 26 Sep 2009 17:12:28 +0200 schrieb Jonas Häggqvist ras...@rasher.dk: Because the list is set up to not change the reply-to to the list address, so most people are left with no choice but hit Reply all, which does just that. Then these people should: remove all the adresses except the

Re: [OSM-dev] Josm bug: deleted nodes cause conflicts

2009-09-26 Thread malenki
Am Sat, 26 Sep 2009 09:45:31 +0200 schrieb Karl Guggisberg karl.guggisb...@guggis.ch: Should be fixed Thanks. Regards malenki ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [OSM-dev] Josm bug: deleted nodes cause conflicts

2009-09-26 Thread John Smith
2009/9/26 Karl Guggisberg karl.guggisb...@guggis.ch: Should be fixed http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/3570 Any ETA on the new jar file? ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [OSM-dev] Josm bug: deleted nodes cause conflicts

2009-09-26 Thread Jonas Häggqvist
malenki wrote: btw: Not my fault if some get two messages in of this content. The mail I replied first came in a bit earlier then the message over ML. Why do people write to lists and CC always to the author whose mail is replied to? Because the list is set up to not change the reply-to to

Re: [OSM-dev] Josm bug: deleted nodes cause conflicts

2009-09-26 Thread malenki
Am Sat, 26 Sep 2009 19:08:59 +1000 schrieb John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com: 2009/9/26 Karl Guggisberg karl.guggisb...@guggis.ch: Should be fixed http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/3570 Any ETA on the new jar file? compile it Or download my compiled version (no guarantees

Re: [OSM-dev] Josm bug: deleted nodes cause conflicts

2009-09-26 Thread Karl Guggisberg
bug: deleted nodes cause conflicts Hi, not only I would really appreciate having this atm ~4 days old bug resolved: http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/3570 Up to now no dev has made any remark there. It's really annoying since the workflow when one runs into the bug gets to about zero. Regards

Re: [OSM-dev] Josm bug: deleted nodes cause conflicts

2009-09-26 Thread Mike N.
This has been hashed over many times in other lists and it's not going to change. Bottom line is people aren't going to change their MUA - your MUA should be sophisticated enough to suppress duplicate emails anyway.

Re: [OSM-dev] Josm bug: deleted nodes cause conflicts

2009-09-26 Thread malenki
Am Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:14:17 -0400 schrieb Mike N. nice...@att.net: This has been hashed over many times in other lists and it's not going to change. Learning curve seems to be steeper as with MS Notepad or nano? :) Bottom line is people aren't going to change their MUA After all they can

Re: [OSM-dev] Josm bug: deleted nodes cause conflicts

2009-09-26 Thread John Smith
2009/9/27 malenki o...@malenki.ch: Learning curve seems to be steeper as with MS Notepad or nano? :) How is that relevent, people use various apps and now web apps for their mail, and I don't know of any web apps that support reply to list. After all they can change the way handling their

Re: [OSM-dev] Josm bug: deleted nodes cause conflicts

2009-09-26 Thread malenki
Am Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:49:07 +1000 schrieb John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com: 2009/9/27 malenki o...@malenki.ch: Learning curve seems to be steeper as with MS Notepad or nano? :) How is that relevent, people use various apps and now web apps for their mail, and I don't know of any web

[OSM-dev] Josm bug: deleted nodes cause conflicts

2009-09-25 Thread malenki
Hi, not only I would really appreciate having this atm ~4 days old bug resolved: http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/3570 Up to now no dev has made any remark there. It's really annoying since the workflow when one runs into the bug gets to about zero. Regards malenki