Not sure what you mean by "designing a WMS API" but a search on "WMS
specification" seems a good start.
- Chris -
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:35, bernhard wrote:
> hi all
>
> I'm working again on my map maplib.
> http://github.com/robotnic/khtmlib
> Internet Explorer should work now (exept vecto
Thomas,
Thanks! That sent me down the right path.
Andy
Thomas Wood wrote:
> This is more suited to the OpenLayers list, but at a guess it's
> because of an incorrect maxResolution setting on the WMS layer, they
> default to the Map, or if that's not set, auto-generated not always
> successfully.
This is more suited to the OpenLayers list, but at a guess it's
because of an incorrect maxResolution setting on the WMS layer, they
default to the Map, or if that's not set, auto-generated not always
successfully.
Setting up the Map object as shown here should be the first step to
getting the ove
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 03:07:42AM +0200, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
> El Miércoles, 25 de Junio de 2008, 80n escribió:
> > > So, I'd like to know if you think it would be a good idea to do load
> > > balancing between several OSMXAPI servers.
> >
> > This is probably a good idea. Do you have any
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 03:07:42AM +0200, Iv?n S?nchez Ortega wrote:
> Well, for what I've read in the Wiki about OSMXAPI, I only know about
> Informationfreeway. Is there a complete list of OSMXAPI servers?
print length(OSMXAPI_SERVERS)
> 1
___
dev
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
> El Miércoles, 25 de Junio de 2008, 80n escribió:
>>> So, I'd like to know if you think it would be a good idea to do load
>>> balancing between several OSMXAPI servers.
>> This is probably a good idea. Do you have any servers in mind?
>
> Well, for what I've read in t
El Miércoles, 25 de Junio de 2008, 80n escribió:
> > So, I'd like to know if you think it would be a good idea to do load
> > balancing between several OSMXAPI servers.
>
> This is probably a good idea. Do you have any servers in mind?
Well, for what I've read in the Wiki about OSMXAPI, I only kn
2008/6/25 Iván Sánchez Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all,
>
>
> First of all, I want to say that WMS sucks. The 100-page spec sucks, the
> efficiency sucks.
>
>
> That said, I just committed to SVN a set of hacks I've come to call "OSM
> WMS".
>
> Why? Long story short, this will allow me to pr
Iván Sánchez Ortega schreef:
> However, the current implementation has the potential of pounding the API
> down
> to its knees (no caching of any kind). In fact, I think it has more bugs than
> features.
>
> So, I'd like to know if you think it would be a good idea to do load
> balancing
> be
9 matches
Mail list logo
