On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 2:33 AM, Stefan de Konink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After changing the api address, JOSM downloads but pops up with:
Error while parsing: The processing instruction target matching
[xX][mM][lL] is not allowed.
What output are you sending and how does it compare to what
Hi,
The problem here is the remedial action taken by the user/editor:
they're going to try to work out the conflicts by downloading the
latest version of the region. If this comes off a replication server
that's a couple of minutes behind,
You could make it so that the intial map query is
Stefan de Konink ha scritto:
But still no can do.
Java error:
org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: The processing instruction target matching
[xX][mM][lL] is not allowed.
Hi Stefan, look for any trailing space before the XML declaration, or
(better) try the generated XML file against an XML
On Wed, 28 May 2008, Stefan de Konink wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2008, Jon Burgess wrote:
How does the content-type for the HTTP download compare to the real API?
(try wget -S http://... and compare all the headers)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ wget -S
On Wed, 28 May 2008, Mario Ferraro wrote:
Hi Stefan, look for any trailing space before the XML declaration, or
(better) try the generated XML file against an XML validation tool.
It passes validator.w3.org :( With the only warning that the file has no
doctype.
Stefan
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stefan de Konink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found this too. Looking at the document that wget writes it is the first
line. Next to this the file opens normally when it is saved to disk first.
The demo with only nodes is now online, please use the following
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I seem to have developed a problem; I used livegps some while ago, and
all was fine. Other than routine Ubuntu josm updates, it's the same
system.
Now, I start gpsd, check it's up running with xgps, then start josm
viola - nothing happens! Livegps
Hi Stefan, don't know if you've already fixed it, but I'm now trying to
download the file from that URL in JOSM (after changing Base Server URL
to http://thuis.kinkrsoftware.nl:8000/about) and it seems to work smoothly.
I'm using JOSM version 639 with Java 1.6 in a Kubuntu 8.04 box.
Mario
Quoting Stefan de Konink [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 28 May 2008, Mario Ferraro wrote:
I looked in wireshark to notice any differences, but if someone wants to
take a peek... be my guest.
Can it be that Linebreak is a problem? In your file I can find a 0x0d,
0x0a, compared to the
On Wed, 28 May 2008, Mario Ferraro wrote:
Hi Stefan, don't know if you've already fixed it, but I'm now trying to
download the file from that URL in JOSM (after changing Base Server URL
to http://thuis.kinkrsoftware.nl:8000/about) and it seems to work smoothly.
I'm using JOSM version 639
There's a still a lot of hardcoded knowledge built into osm2pgsql and
it is in some respects rather inflexible. To that end I would like to
extend osm2pgsql at least in the following ways:
- The output tables specified by the style file also, so that it would
be easy to, for example, create a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Stefan Agner schreef:
Quoting Stefan de Konink [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 28 May 2008, Mario Ferraro wrote:
I looked in wireshark to notice any differences, but if someone wants to
take a peek... be my guest.
Can it be that Linebreak
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The problem here is the remedial action taken by the user/editor:
they're going to try to work out the conflicts by downloading the
latest version of the region. If this comes off a replication server
that's a
Stefan de Konink ha scritto:
I'm at 645, 2008-05-21 10:28. Java 1.6.0_06.
Maybe stable versions of applications are things a guy should use.
Tested in build 645, it works for me
java -version output:
java version 1.6.0
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0-b09)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM
Francisco R. Santos schreef:
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Stefan de Konink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2008, Mario Ferraro wrote:
Hi Stefan, don't know if you've already fixed it, but I'm now
trying to
download the file
Mario Ferraro schreef:
Have you tried to output the raw osm file (taken from openstreetmap)
from your server? This could avoid you from suspecting at least headers
and try to hack the file only (or otherwise, stop to hack the file and
look for headers).
It is total voodoo.
[EMAIL
Stefan de Konink ha scritto:
Stefan de Konink schreef:
Mario Ferraro schreef:
Have you tried to output the raw osm file (taken from openstreetmap)
from your server? This could avoid you from suspecting at least
headers and try to hack the file only (or otherwise, stop to hack
the file
Looking for an exorcist telephone number :)
Mario
999 666 999 - 23
___
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
Mario Ferraro schreef:
That's great, let us know when you'll find it, just curious :)
If it helps, here the HTTP headers I was trying to read to find out
something. They're equal, but I think they were already.
There *must* be a bug somewhere.
--- osm-goed2008-05-28 17:58:43.828003816
I have created a packetcapture in wireshark and it is clear that the
connection is dropped. Who is responsible, I have no clue yet.
http://xen.bot.nu/josm-request.pcap
Stefan
___
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 18:53 +0200, Stefan de Konink wrote:
I have created a packetcapture in wireshark and it is clear that the
connection is dropped. Who is responsible, I have no clue yet.
http://xen.bot.nu/josm-request.pcap
Your content length is looking suspect:
Content-Length:
Hi,
for some time now, it is not possible to add presets to the toolbar. Though
they appear in the configuration dialog properly and can be added, they will
not be available in the toolbar, even after a restart.
Anyone here who has interest to check this issue?
Best regards,
ce
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 19:09 +0100, Jon Burgess wrote:
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 18:53 +0200, Stefan de Konink wrote:
I have created a packetcapture in wireshark and it is clear that the
connection is dropped. Who is responsible, I have no clue yet.
http://xen.bot.nu/josm-request.pcap
I was looking at the template file osm-template.xml. In there I see a
definition for a ShieldSymbolizer.
Style name=roads-text
Rule
Filter[highway] = 'motorway' and [length] = 1/Filter
MaxScaleDenominator50/MaxScaleDenominator
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Jon Burgess schreef:
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 18:53 +0200, Stefan de Konink wrote:
I have created a packetcapture in wireshark and it is clear that the
connection is dropped. Who is responsible, I have no clue yet.
Can anybody point me in the direction of an algorithm that will
determine whether a closed way (polyline) is clockwise or anti-
clockwise?
cheers
Richard
___
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Can anybody point me in the direction of an algorithm that will
determine whether a closed way (polyline) is clockwise or anti-
clockwise?
cheers
Richard
___
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
Stefan de Konink wrote:
Jon Burgess schreef:
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 18:53 +0200, Stefan de Konink wrote:
I have created a packetcapture in wireshark and it is clear that the
connection is dropped. Who is responsible, I have no clue yet.
http://xen.bot.nu/josm-request.pcap
Your content
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 22:22 +0200, Stefan de Konink wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Jon Burgess schreef:
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 18:53 +0200, Stefan de Konink wrote:
I have created a packetcapture in wireshark and it is clear that the
connection is dropped. Who is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Jon Burgess schreef:
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 19:11 +0100, Jon Burgess wrote:
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 19:09 +0100, Jon Burgess wrote:
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 18:53 +0200, Stefan de Konink wrote:
I have created a packetcapture in wireshark and it is
On May 28, 2008, at 1:35 PM, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Can anybody point me in the direction of an algorithm that will
determine whether a closed way (polyline) is clockwise or anti-
clockwise?
Richard,
there is a good set of (explanations of) algorithms here:
Nathan Vander Wilt schrieb:
On May 28, 2008, at 1:35 PM, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Can anybody point me in the direction of an algorithm that will
determine whether a closed way (polyline) is clockwise or anti-
clockwise?
Richard,
there is a good set of
Stefan de Konink schrieb:
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 19:11 +0100, Jon Burgess wrote:
$ grep 45136089 /tmp/foo2.xml
node id=45136089 lat=52.0758997 lon=4.37710004 visible=true
user=not_implemented timestamp=2007-09-07T16:39:10+01:00
node id=45136089 lat=52.0758997
Dirk-Lüder Kreie schreef:
Three times seems to point to one full map return copy each for
nodes/ways/relations.
The author of Cherokee pointed me to the _step code in the module. I'm
hacking on that, now.
Stefan
___
dev mailing list
Thanks Richard and Nathan for the pointers - really appreciated. I
think I've got it now.
Nathan Vander Wilt wrote:
[...]
That said, I'm guessing there are other assumptions being made
within OSM that break down under spherical geometry. If your polygon
doesn't contain pole(s) or cross
35 matches
Mail list logo
