Hi Frederik,
QPL is GPL incompatible? Doh! I was unaware of this...I was aware that
CGAL is at least contagiously copy-left...not something I terribly like.
My thought though is that for a stand-alone tool this is not necessarily
a deal-breaker.
cheers
ben
Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Be
Hi,
Ben Supnik wrote:
> I figure this is as good of a time as any to plug CGAL...it's a hard
> core open source comp-geom lib:
Great piece of software, but it is worth noting that CGAL has a license
issue. Parts of it are LGPL (which is ok) but some of the more
interesting bits are under a fri
> Is the old page redirecting to the new page?
All old pages should redirect to their new versions, yes:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Protocol_Version_0.3
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Protocol_Version_0.4
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Protocol_Version_0.5
http://wiki.o
On 14 Sep 2009, at 19:26, Lars Francke wrote:
+1
This has needed a tidyup for a long time.
I'm done with this change.
I have renamed every relevant page to "API v0.x" and "API changes
between v0.x and v0.y" and I tried to correct every link to point to
the new name. I might have missed some r
Hi Guys,
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
> P.S.: Remind me to take a course in computational geometry. I'm feeling like
> I
> need it.
I figure this is as good of a time as any to plug CGAL...it's a hard
core open source comp-geom lib:
http://www.cgal.org/
in my work with OSM (exporting all road
> +1
> This has needed a tidyup for a long time.
I'm done with this change.
I have renamed every relevant page to "API v0.x" and "API changes
between v0.x and v0.y" and I tried to correct every link to point to
the new name. I might have missed some references but...it should
work, because the old
2009/9/14 Frederik Ramm
> Ian,
>
> > This feature could be added, but could you draw a couple pictures to
> > explain what you mean? What happens with the graph edges inside the
> > multipolygon? Since they aren't really polygons, do they belong in a
> > multipolygon relation? Maybe I'm not corre
El Lunes, 14 de Septiembre de 2009, Frederik Ramm escribió:
> [...] The goal is to split up the polygons into their border lines, and then
> create OSM multipolygon relations where the border consists of several of
> those lines, and every line is used by two adjacent polygons [...]
*AT LEAST* t
Shaun McDonald writes:
> On 13 Sep 2009, at 10:56, Andrew M. Bishop wrote:
>
>> In OSM a relation can contain other relations but it seems that there
>> is nothing to check that a relation doesn't contain itself. I can't
>> think of any legitimate reason that it should be allowed though.
> From
Ian,
> This feature could be added, but could you draw a couple pictures to
> explain what you mean? What happens with the graph edges inside the
> multipolygon? Since they aren't really polygons, do they belong in a
> multipolygon relation? Maybe I'm not correctly interpreting what you meant.
El Lunes, 14 de Septiembre de 2009, Ian Dees escribió:
> This feature could be added, but could you draw a couple pictures to
> explain what you mean? What happens with the graph edges inside the
> multipolygon? Since they aren't really polygons, do they belong in a
> multipolygon relation? Maybe I
> does anybody know an JAVA-Library with similar features like OpenLayers
> Javascript-Lib?
> I would like to enhance our Java-Client to get maps from WMS-Servers.
> Thanks for your effort.
I don't know if it fills your needs but take a look to this software:
http://www.geomajas.org/
Bye,
Stef
2009/9/14 Iván Sánchez Ortega
>
> You can see where this goes. If the input polygons are non-overlapping and
> adjacent, I could redraw the edges of the polygons as graph edges, put a
> graph node whenever three (or more) polygons touch each other, and then
> apply
> some graph theory to convert
Hi,
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
> You can see where this goes. If the input polygons are non-overlapping and
> adjacent, I could redraw the edges of the polygons as graph edges, put a
> graph node whenever three (or more) polygons touch each other, and then apply
> some graph theory to convert e
Hi all,
During the imports support group conference call, the question of import tools
was raised.
I can't quite recall everyone's point of view, but I think that the general
idea was "the more tools, the better".
I'm all for an unix-like approach: lots of small specialised tools, that work
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Claudius Henrichs
wrote:
> I've set up a wiki page [1] with some impressive routing results on OSM
> data compared to Google. For example we can already route from Teheran,
> Iran to Lisbon, Portugal and to New Delhi, India. Or you can hail a cab
> in Mexico City
On 09/09/2009 17:43, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> It looks like the cursor moves with the same ammount of positions as
> bytes encoding the UTF-8 character.
I wouldn't be surprised at all. I'm a little loth to spend time on
fine-tuning something, with the risk of introducing more bugs, that
Adobe real
17 matches
Mail list logo
