#3472: Typing b when the background is OS locator should set source:name
--+-
Reporter: Wynndale | Owner: potlatch-dev@…
Type: enhancement | Status: closed
Hi All,
I was having great difficulty with applying the daily diffs to my
PostgreSQL database (8.4 and 9.0). I would get good performance right
after a vacuum, but after a few hours of updates, it would be running at
less than real-time. After a great deal of experimentation, I found that
the GIN
Corrected patch attached (without my custom change to default.style).
Hi All,
I was having great difficulty with applying the daily diffs to my
PostgreSQL database (8.4 and 9.0). I would get good performance right
after a vacuum, but after a few hours of updates, it would be running at
less
On 23/01/11 16:24, Erik Burrows wrote:
I was having great difficulty with applying the daily diffs to my
PostgreSQL database (8.4 and 9.0). I would get good performance right
after a vacuum, but after a few hours of updates, it would be running at
less than real-time. After a great deal of
On 23-1-2011 17:44, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 23/01/11 16:24, Erik Burrows wrote:
I was having great difficulty with applying the daily diffs to my
PostgreSQL database (8.4 and 9.0). I would get good performance right
[...]
I wonder if in fact this is the performance problem that we saw using an
8.3 didn't have the fastupdate function at all, so I would imagine it is
possible that the fastupdate introduction in 8.4 was the problem, since
it is on by default in 8.4 and 9.0.
I still have my 8.4 database, so I started it up and am re-creating the
GIN indexes with fastupdate=off, to see if
On 23/01/11 17:13, Lennard wrote:
On 23-1-2011 17:44, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 23/01/11 16:24, Erik Burrows wrote:
I was having great difficulty with applying the daily diffs to my
PostgreSQL database (8.4 and 9.0). I would get good performance right
[...]
I wonder if in fact this is the
Do we actually know that 9.0 is ok though? I was basing my comments on a
single report of some preliminary tests at SOTM last year.
Can someone explain the problem itself? We will set up our xapi database
tomorrow and we would like to use 9.0. We can do some testing on 8.* and
9.* if you
First import ist fast, index creation after it is normal. When the
minutely updates start, they're fast at beginning but tend to get slower
and slower until they get slower than realtime (eg. 5 minutes of changes
take 10 minutes to import).
In a normal setup, the diffs take around 1/2 the
On 23/01/11 17:59, Philipp Borgers wrote:
Do we actually know that 9.0 is ok though? I was basing my comments on a
single report of some preliminary tests at SOTM last year.
Can someone explain the problem itself? We will set up our xapi database
tomorrow and we would like to use 9.0. We can
Hi,
On Monday morning I'm intending to switching the existing nominatim
service over to an updated code base designed to allow better scaling
and additional data sources (tiger, external postcode sets, etc) as
well as being the first stage of various other improvements.
With any luck the only
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Brian Quinion
openstreet...@brian.quinion.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
On Monday morning I'm intending to switching the existing nominatim
service over to an updated code base designed to allow better scaling
and additional data sources (tiger, external postcode sets,
12 matches
Mail list logo
