Andy Allan wrote:
> [1] using the XML api. Technically if you want to do some AMF
> parsing, the world is your oyster, but you'll have a bad (salty)
> taste left in your mouth.
I quite like oysters. But the last time I had some I was very, very ill
indeed. I'm not sure what the parallel is there
On 19 February 2012 20:46, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> This requires some sort of "show me all deleted objects in this area" API
> call, and once that exists, editors could support it in some way. Potlatch 1
> already has an undelete function but uses a custom API that can not easily
> be re-used by o
Hi,
On 02/20/2012 09:32 AM, Simon Poole wrote:
I think you misunderstood something there. Any undelete function after
the 1st April will only show untainted objects.
Indeed. At least here in Germany we do have a few areas where at one
time in the past, a very eager mapper deleted all that was
I think you misunderstood something there. Any undelete function after
the 1st April will only show untainted objects.
Simon
Am 20.02.2012 08:29, schrieb Thomas Davie:
> I'm not sure what this would help with, other than copying a
> decliner's copyrighted data.
>
> Bob
> if (*ra4 != 0xffc78948) {
I'm not sure what this would help with, other than copying a decliner's
copyrighted data.
Bob
if (*ra4 != 0xffc78948) { return false; }
On 19 Feb 2012, at 20:46, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after the license change, when people are faced with empty areas here and
> there, it would be nic
Hi,
after the license change, when people are faced with empty areas
here and there, it would be nice to have a good undelete feature, so
that one can at least get back whatever was there before the area was
mapped by someone who disagreed to the license change.
This requires some sort of
6 matches
Mail list logo
