Re: [OSM-dev] OSM software repositories -- git and svn

2014-06-04 Thread Stephan Bösch-Plepelits
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 06:12:44PM -0700, Paul Norman wrote: > Whenever I weigh the positives and negatives of using Github, I > always come out in favor of using it. Yeah, the workflow with Github is really awesome. I like it too. There's an alternative though, which we are starting at my place o

Re: [OSM-dev] OSM software repositories -- git and svn

2014-06-04 Thread Greg Troxel
this is a discussion/brainstorming about if and how to get rid of what remains of the OSM project SVN. I think your points about what's nice about the openstreetmap svn are valid. A few thoughts 1) git != github osm could host a git repo and allow the same set of people who can write t

Re: [OSM-dev] OSM software repositories -- git and svn

2014-06-03 Thread Paul Norman
On 2014-06-03 11:52 AM, Brian DeRocher wrote: What i do like about GitHub is how it facilitates forking and automated testing. But i don't like how we are relying on the good will of a 3rd party company. As a maintainer of projects which use github, I understand the reservations. Github ha

Re: [OSM-dev] OSM software repositories -- git and svn

2014-06-03 Thread Brian DeRocher
Check out how KDE does things. Here's a deep link into Kmail repository https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdepim/repository/revisions/master/show/kmail They use ChiliProject, a fork of Redmine. Btw there's nothing wrong with Trac as it supports Git too. https://mappingdc.org/trac/ What i

Re: [OSM-dev] OSM software repositories -- git and svn

2014-05-26 Thread Matt Amos
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 8:44 PM, Jochen Topf wrote: > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:19:07PM +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote: >> 2. discoverability > > Lots of little repositories and a 101st with repo with list of repo URLs > sound good to me. This would also allow different ownership/rights for > all of

Re: [OSM-dev] OSM software repositories -- git and svn

2014-05-23 Thread Jochen Topf
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:19:07PM +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote: > 2. discoverability > > I know that there are people who create a github repository for > everything, even if it's just a 30-line text file to maintain. Doing > that for all the conceptually different things that we now have in our >

Re: [OSM-dev] OSM software repositories -- git and svn

2014-05-23 Thread Jochen Topf
On Fr, Mai 23, 2014 at 03:19:07 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Should everyone who remotely considers themselves an OSM developer have > write access to the "openstreetmap" repository in github, or should we > create an "openstreetmap-developer" repository for that which would have > a "less officia

Re: [OSM-dev] OSM software repositories -- git and svn

2014-05-23 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 05/23/2014 07:31 PM, Paul Hartmann wrote: > I just like to point out, that there is already a dedicated github account: > https://github.com/openstreetmap > It hosts for example iD, osm2pgsql, mod_tile and lots of mirrors. I was aware of that but I'm not sure if people would be happy for a

Re: [OSM-dev] OSM software repositories -- git and svn

2014-05-23 Thread Paul Hartmann
Hi, I just like to point out, that there is already a dedicated github account: https://github.com/openstreetmap It hosts for example iD, osm2pgsql, mod_tile and lots of mirrors. Technically, "openstreetmap" is a github Organization. This means, not a single person owns the account, but a gro

[OSM-dev] OSM software repositories -- git and svn

2014-05-23 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, this is a discussion/brainstorming about if and how to get rid of what remains of the OSM project SVN. Let me first say what I liked about SVN: * I liked that there was a project-wide SVN without any privilege hierarchies. Everyone could ask for an account, and then they could commit chan