Re: [josm-dev] New tested version after API change fix?
Hi, I think we should enter in stabilization phase ASAP. I should have some time this week-end to run extensive tests, so a stable version released next week sounds a good idea to me. Vincent 2012/7/12 Paul Hartmann phaau...@googlemail.com Hi, In the process of the license switch, there has been a small change of the OSM API [1]. This causes JOSM to crash in certain situations [2][3]. A fix has been committed (v. 5326), so as a user you might want to update JOSM or at least save often, especially before upload and data update. @team: Do you think we should release an emergency tested version? The fix [5326] might cause a couple of bugs at other places, so in any case no need to rush things. [1] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/dev/2012-July/025209.html [2] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/rebuild/2012-July/000317.html [3] http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/7847 Paul ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New tested version after API change fix?
On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Vincent Privat wrote: I think we should enter in stabilization phase ASAP. I should have some time this week-end to run extensive tests, so a stable version released next week sounds a good idea to me. Volunteers are always accepted. Feel free to modify the wiki schedule pages and do the release. If you have questions, ask Paul or me by mail :-) As we had only few changes I would suggest a short stabilization phase when no problems appear in tests. Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available) ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New tested version after API change fix?
2012/7/13 Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de: On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Vincent Privat wrote: I think we should enter in stabilization phase ASAP. I should have some time this week-end to run extensive tests, so a stable version released next week sounds a good idea to me. Volunteers are always accepted. Feel free to modify the wiki schedule pages and do the release. If you have questions, ask Paul or me by mail :-) As we had only few changes I would suggest a short stabilization phase when no problems appear in tests. +1, if you do extensive testing, you can as well take over the release completely. After all, the main work is to ensure that the software is stable enough for general use. Paul ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New tested version after API change fix?
Alright :) Stabilization begins now. Objective: release on Wednesday. ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
[josm-dev] New tested version after API change fix?
Hi, In the process of the license switch, there has been a small change of the OSM API [1]. This causes JOSM to crash in certain situations [2][3]. A fix has been committed (v. 5326), so as a user you might want to update JOSM or at least save often, especially before upload and data update. @team: Do you think we should release an emergency tested version? The fix [5326] might cause a couple of bugs at other places, so in any case no need to rush things. [1] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/dev/2012-July/025209.html [2] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/rebuild/2012-July/000317.html [3] http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/7847 Paul ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New Tested
I see the current tested is 3965. Please bump it to 3966, fix #6049 was done in haste, so I forgot about negative numbers. 2011/3/7 Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Sebastian Klein wrote: Wo hakt es denn? Bitte die Fristen nicht so unkommentiert verstreichen lassen... Fixed. 3961 is tested now. Was meinst du eigentlich mit 5.3 genau, die Version um 3 Uhr morgens oder die um 27 Uhr? Well, +/- 5 Days :-) Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available) ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev -- Best regards, Upliner ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New Tested
Dirk Stöcker wrote: Hello, The 5th of March should be the next release of a josm tested. Wo hakt es denn? Bitte die Fristen nicht so unkommentiert verstreichen lassen... Was meinst du eigentlich mit 5.3 genau, die Version um 3 Uhr morgens oder die um 27 Uhr? Gruß, Sebastian ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New Tested
Sebastian Klein wrote: Dirk Stöcker wrote: Hello, The 5th of March should be the next release of a josm tested. Wo hakt es denn? Bitte die Fristen nicht so unkommentiert verstreichen lassen... Was meinst du eigentlich mit 5.3 genau, die Version um 3 Uhr morgens oder die um 27 Uhr? Oops, was supposed to be private mail... :) ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New Tested
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Sebastian Klein wrote: Wo hakt es denn? Bitte die Fristen nicht so unkommentiert verstreichen lassen... Fixed. 3961 is tested now. Was meinst du eigentlich mit 5.3 genau, die Version um 3 Uhr morgens oder die um 27 Uhr? Well, +/- 5 Days :-) Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available) ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New Tested
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011, Dirk Stöcker wrote: 2. what parts of JOSM will not work as long as the server is down? Every automatism (update-list, plugins-list, style-list, help and start page), and Yahoo download. For all of these users would need to do the manual way - download and install :-) The same as when using JOSM offline. To make it clearer: JOSM accesses following server values: /plugins * collected list of plugins and their meta information /plugin-icons.zip * collected list of plugin icons to make plugin table nicer /styles * collected list of external styles to be used for installation /presets * collected list of external presets to be used for installation - StartupPage and Help as well as their translations for display - Yahoo-WMS-Access-script None of these are criticial infrastructure and all pass through certain layers of security checks, so malcontent must be carefully crafted. The easiest is to write a dangerous plugin (due to bugs in older versions you can produce exceptions (e.g. NPE) with crafted styles/presets as well). Attacking through the web-services itself is much more complicated, as you need to trick Trac as well as the JOSM server checks and JOSM itself. Yes, it is possible, but even if I spend my whole days checking and fixing holes I can't prevent it. Since the time we accessed the web-pages directly to extract information, there have been many improvements and the newest changes again reduce the influence of external hosted contents. It is much easier to have plugins in OSM-SVN than to develop them external, so nearly all of them are in OSM-SVN, where we can have a look at. Now we created a system, which makes adding styles/presets in the wiki much easier than handling them externally, so the number of externally managed content will decrease over time and it is easier to have a look at that stuff. Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available)___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New Tested
Frederik Ramm wrote: Hi, Dirk Stöcker wrote: Please note also, that this week a new server infrastructure has been established. JOSM mappaint styles, mapcss styles and JOSM presets can now be made in the JOSM Trac wiki pages. Assuming there was some catastrophic server failure, and further assuming that you are not personally available to fix things - 1. will anyone else in the world be able to re-create the trac setup that you have created? Are any of the core JOSM developers involved? I know that I'm not and to me it looks like quite a maze! How long would it take someone to create the required infrastructure? Is there documentation? (Don't say yes, in trac ;) Are there backups that include all the config files etc.? I don't think it is that bad. :) As Dirk said, the magic is contained in 2 single files: The cronjob and the trac plugin. 2. what parts of JOSM will not work as long as the server is down? JOSM runs just fine without the josm.openstreetmap.de server. Dirk listed most of the server dependent services, let me add that it can't update the list of available wms/tms urls and the bug report system won't be able to redirect to trac, obviously. All files loaded from a remote server are cached locally for 7 days. (But it keeps the old copy if update fails.) There are 3 exceptions to this rule: * plugin update is always on demand * list of users that agreed to the CT is cached only 2 hours * wiki help content (including message of the day) isn't cached at all So basically no functionality accesses the server, unless it is absolutely necessary. (Yes, we could distribute the wiki help, but this also means you get outdated information and the size of josm-*.jar increases.) In addition, everything can be done manually (plugin installation, adding presets, styles and imagery urls). Sebastian ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New Tested
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011, Sebastian Klein wrote: JOSM runs just fine without the josm.openstreetmap.de server. Dirk listed most of the server dependent services, let me add that it can't update the list of available wms/tms urls Ooops, forgot that one. Probably because I never had trouble with it yet. * wiki help content (including message of the day) isn't cached at all Hah, here you are wrong. The MOTD is cached, but it uses a different cache than the other files :-) BTW: For JOSM we have nearly no attacks which aren't automatic SPAM. Maybe one or twice a month real persons try to get some strange stuff into the wiki/tickets. I care for the spam filtering on the main Trac website as well and there the situation is much different (human based attacks every day). Both sites are approximately equal when looking a the real usage. Best I still like the ones uploading a picture to a wiki page stating You have been hacked. Really the work of a hacker, isn't it :-) Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available) ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
[josm-dev] New Tested
Hello, The 5th of March should be the next release of a josm tested. Due to different reasons (one beeing the major work of Sebastian to integrate the MapCSS support) we skipped a release end of January. But we try to have a release end of this month. So please all of you try to find and fix major bugs and review bug reports. Please note also, that this week a new server infrastructure has been established. JOSM mappaint styles, mapcss styles and JOSM presets can now be made in the JOSM Trac wiki pages. This should make designing styles and presets much easier, especially when additional icons are involved (simply attach them to wiki page). Stuff below Styles/ and Presets/ hierarchy is automatically added to the corresponding lists. Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available) ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New Tested
Hi, Dirk Stöcker wrote: Please note also, that this week a new server infrastructure has been established. JOSM mappaint styles, mapcss styles and JOSM presets can now be made in the JOSM Trac wiki pages. Assuming there was some catastrophic server failure, and further assuming that you are not personally available to fix things - 1. will anyone else in the world be able to re-create the trac setup that you have created? Are any of the core JOSM developers involved? I know that I'm not and to me it looks like quite a maze! How long would it take someone to create the required infrastructure? Is there documentation? (Don't say yes, in trac ;) Are there backups that include all the config files etc.? 2. what parts of JOSM will not work as long as the server is down? Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33 ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] new tested version?
Hi, Happy new year to everyone! Version 3751 is set to tested; the stabilization phase was long enough, we can start with new development right now! I'm still a little enthusiastic about the fact we can use Bing imagery and that it's properly build into JOSM, now. :-) Thanks to everyone who made this possible, especially Upliner and Ian Dees and all former contributors. Cheers, Sebastian ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
[josm-dev] new tested version?
Hi, what about a new tested version this year? Most problems related to plugin integration should be solved and imagery seems to be stable. We could target the 30.-31. Dec. nightly build as release candidate. Sebastian ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-...@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New Tested
Le 07/10/2010 08:56, Dirk Stöcker a écrit : On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, Dirk Stöcker wrote: if no new bugs show up, I will make 3589 tested tomorrow. 3592 is new tested now. Ciao Josm 3592 is now available on fedora repository. To try it : yum --enablerepo=updates-testing install josm ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New Tested
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, Dirk Stöcker wrote: if no new bugs show up, I will make 3589 tested tomorrow. 3592 is new tested now. Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available)___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
[josm-dev] New Tested
Hello, if no new bugs show up, I will make 3589 tested tomorrow. Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available) ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-...@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New Tested
2010/9/6 Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de: On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Sebastian Klein wrote: Do we wait for bug reports by users of the new tested and how long shall we wait before adding new stuff? 1-2 days, but I don't expect serious bugs - we usually get these in latest already :-) A little but nasty bug. http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/5397 ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New Tested
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, André Riedel wrote: 1-2 days, but I don't expect serious bugs - we usually get these in latest already :-) A little but nasty bug. http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/5397 This one has been closed as irreproducible. It can't be that bad. Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available)___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New Tested
2010/9/8 Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de: On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, André Riedel wrote: 1-2 days, but I don't expect serious bugs - we usually get these in latest already :-) A little but nasty bug. http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/5397 This one has been closed as irreproducible. It can't be that bad. Actually I find JOSM a little bit buggy recently (I think it was introduced with autosave): on startup it always tells me that it wants to recover a autobackup because it thinks that JOSM crashed last time, which is not the case. I do discard but next time it asks me again, even if I did nothing except of restarting. When I do restore instead nothing happens either. The other issue is while closing: I always get the warning that I forgot to upload, even though I already uploaded. And indeed on upload attempt it says: nothing to upload. cheers, Martin ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New Tested
2010/9/8 Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de: On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, André Riedel wrote: 1-2 days, but I don't expect serious bugs - we usually get these in latest already :-) A little but nasty bug. http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/5397 This one has been closed as irreproducible. It can't be that bad. This email waited 2 days in the outbox of my email software. So I didn't notice the status change. But I reopened it a few minutes ago. Ciao André ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New Tested
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2010/9/8 Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de: On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, André Riedel wrote: 1-2 days, but I don't expect serious bugs - we usually get these in latest already :-) A little but nasty bug. http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/5397 This one has been closed as irreproducible. It can't be that bad. Actually I find JOSM a little bit buggy recently (I think it was introduced with autosave): on startup it always tells me that it wants to recover a autobackup because it thinks that JOSM crashed last time, which is not the case. I do discard but next time it asks me again, even if I did nothing except of restarting. When I do restore instead nothing happens either. This is news to me, would be best to have a trac ticket for it, but anyway: As a quick diagnosis you could observe the content of the autosave folder in the josm preferences directory (%APPDATA%\JOSM or ~/.josm). Does it delete any file when you click discard? Is it the same if you not load anything and just repeatedly start and close JOSM (each time discarding autosave)? What is your OS? The other issue is while closing: I always get the warning that I forgot to upload, even though I already uploaded. And indeed on upload attempt it says: nothing to upload. It also warns if the file is not saved. Are you sure the warning is about upload? Sebastian ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New Tested
2010/9/8 Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com: This is news to me, would be best to have a trac ticket for it, but anyway: I thought to remember there was one for this. As a quick diagnosis you could observe the content of the autosave folder in the josm preferences directory (%APPDATA%\JOSM or ~/.josm). I deleted the content of autosave. Now the problem seems solved. There is a subfolder deleted layers of which the content doesn't get deleted even if I never uploaded (I made a new layer, drew something, closed JOSM without upload or save, now there is this deleted layers content (Data Layer 1_20100908_1214.osm) Does it delete any file when you click discard? no, it didn't. Now the problem seems solved, as it doesn't ask me anymore (because I deleted the autosave content). Is it the same if you not load anything and just repeatedly start and close JOSM (each time discarding autosave)? It was like this before, yes. What is your OS? ubuntu 10.04 The other issue is while closing: I always get the warning that I forgot to upload, even though I already uploaded. And indeed on upload attempt it says: nothing to upload. It also warns if the file is not saved. Are you sure the warning is about upload? yes, I'm aware of that. It was about upload (just upload, not save, which is right, as I didn't save a layer). cheers, Martin ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New Tested
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Dirk Stöcker wrote: as we forgot the tested release in August, we now can schedule a new release in time for September. So please prepare everything for a new release in first week of September. Any objections against 3514 as tested? Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available)___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New Tested
Dirk Stöcker wrote: On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Dirk Stöcker wrote: as we forgot the tested release in August, we now can schedule a new release in time for September. So please prepare everything for a new release in first week of September. Any objections against 3514 as tested? Ciao No. Do we wait for bug reports by users of the new tested and how long shall we wait before adding new stuff? Sebastian ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New Tested
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Sebastian Klein wrote: Do we wait for bug reports by users of the new tested and how long shall we wait before adding new stuff? 1-2 days, but I don't expect serious bugs - we usually get these in latest already :-) Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available) ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New Tested
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Alan Mintz wrote: At 2010-08-25 15:18, Sebastian Klein wrote: The problem is, plugins are loaded first, so they win. :) It is not hard to fix the plugins that try to grab a well known shortcut, but we have to know about it! Please create a ticket on trac, if you find such a case. It's hard to know when it's intentional and you'd just be wasting time, though. It's not always a plugin, either. For example, Mode:Draw got moved When it is announced on the cosole output, then it is always an error. Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available) ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New Tested
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:39 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: Some of the shortcut-issues might come from plugins. Please do not allow to plugins to redefine already in use major shortcuts like a, s, d, x, j, p, c, m, etc. Its horrible to hit ctrl+shift+m instead of m to simply merge 2 nodes. Sure, it's better that 'others' will have to hit ctrl+shift+m instead of your etc even if there shortcuts are in use since a long time. If you don't like plugins shortcut, then don't install them or redefine their shortcuts in the preferences. Pieren ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-...@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New Tested
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: I'm talking about plugins that redefine common standard keys. That is IMHO bad for the usability. Is this possible? I always thought that once a shortcut is defined it can only be changed by the user. First one wins... Stephan ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-...@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
[josm-dev] New Tested
Hello, as we forgot the tested release in August, we now can schedule a new release in time for September. So please prepare everything for a new release in first week of September. Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available) ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New Tested
2010/8/25 Pieren pier...@gmail.com: On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:39 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: Some of the shortcut-issues might come from plugins. Please do not allow to plugins to redefine already in use major shortcuts like a, s, d, x, j, p, c, m, etc. Its horrible to hit ctrl+shift+m instead of m to simply merge 2 nodes. Sure, it's better that 'others' will have to hit ctrl+shift+m instead of your etc even if there shortcuts are in use since a long time. If you don't like plugins shortcut, then don't install them or redefine their shortcuts in the preferences. I'm talking about plugins that redefine common standard keys. That is IMHO bad for the usability. m to merge nodes was there for ages. Now it converts the geometry to a multipolygon. Which one do you use more often? If you hit ctrl+z to undo, the tags that were deleted from the geometry and put into the relation don't get copied back (the geometry has no tags any more). Cheers, Martin ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New Tested
Stephan Knauss wrote: M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: I'm talking about plugins that redefine common standard keys. That is IMHO bad for the usability. Is this possible? I always thought that once a shortcut is defined it can only be changed by the user. First one wins... The problem is, plugins are loaded first, so they win. :) It is not hard to fix the plugins that try to grab a well known shortcut, but we have to know about it! Please create a ticket on trac, if you find such a case. Sebastian ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New Tested
2010/8/26 Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com: It is not hard to fix the plugins that try to grab a well known shortcut, but we have to know about it! Please create a ticket on trac, if you find such a case. done cheers, Martin ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New Tested
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Rolf Bode-Meyer schrieb: time for next release is reached. Any objections against releasing current latest as tested and move on with JAVA6 from now on? Yes, besides the particular bugs colliar already mentioned there are other blockers in Trac. Either they're real blockers or not. If the former, release is impossible by definition of a blocker. If (after thorough evaluation) the latter, degrade them to critical (which btw already contains eleven bugs which should also considered to be not really harmless - otherwise they're prioritised wrong too). All in all I don't feel quite comfortable with the current state. +1 Because of the bugs I mentioned, I can not test latest quite often. Maybe there are even more bugs hidden !!! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREIAAYFAku7CIgACgkQalWTFLzqsCtocQCeJVWoYF8jsxjf+ZsGN7jtiPwQ uIgAnjEzjP7crkFmo08R8BJv+6tPz01c =X6EQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New Tested
time for next release is reached. Any objections against releasing current latest as tested and move on with JAVA6 from now on? Yes, besides the particular bugs colliar already mentioned there are other blockers in Trac. Either they're real blockers or not. If the former, release is impossible by definition of a blocker. If (after thorough evaluation) the latter, degrade them to critical (which btw already contains eleven bugs which should also considered to be not really harmless - otherwise they're prioritised wrong too). All in all I don't feel quite comfortable with the current state. Robert ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New Tested
Pieren wrote: On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.dewrote: Hello, time for next release is reached. Any objections against releasing current latest as tested and move on with JAVA6 from now on? Ciao I have submitted a patch 5 weeks ago for a change in the french cadastre projections: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/4641 If someone could apply it before another 5 weeks, thank you. It's applied, now. If there is no reaction for that long, I would bring it up again, after a week or two. Sebastian ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
[josm-dev] New Tested
Hello, time for next release is reached. Any objections against releasing current latest as tested and move on with JAVA6 from now on? Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available) ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New Tested
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Thanks for your work and thanks for asking. Yes I do: #4791, #4795, #4818 only happen to me with unstable. #4366 and #4675 are still not fixed ?! cu colliar -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREIAAYFAku3SaMACgkQalWTFLzqsCtgDACfTTrPTGDoESAH/yNhS6oU5hdk Ra8AmwedD0k58wvh5DV6ihyGpXF366uQ =Rqwm -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New tested version
Hello, Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de writes: I know it is always more fun to develop fancy new stuff (and Karl's stuff are big improvements for josm), but keeping the bugs low is also important. So I would be happy if some more people keep an eye on the bug tracker and fix this or that bug sometimes. Also helping to get reports reproducable or add valuable information sometimes would be a good idea. We have some long standing bugs which have lots of duplicates and seem to be hard to track down at all. sometimes I find a ticket and know there was something similary but I can not find it. To get related ticks I sometimes add an see also link. I have also added keywords and a link for finding tickets which belongs together (I found another duplicate this way): https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Ticket%20lists Greetings Sebastian Waschik ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New tested version
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Christoph Eckert wrote: I made 1981 new tested. Looking to the latest changelog, tells me that there are some minor changes/patches which should not be unfixed for the net month. So it is probably better to set the tomorrow version as the next tested version of the month. phew, I did some last minute changes to the presets then. I hope I didn't screw it up. Actually all changes after 1981 have been your presets. I would consider these news instead of critical bugfixes and also due to missing translations I don't see a need to replace tested 1981. Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available) ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
[josm-dev] New tested version
Hello, I made 1981 new tested. This means when no BIG issues pop up next few days then the next round for bigger changes is open the next two weeks and afterwards two weeks finetuning, so that we may have next release mid of September. I think this release has the largest revision difference (1981-1788) and nearly nothing is in the news section. Most of the changes are not visible to users, but are probably very important for josm's future. As long as we have such valuable contributors as Karl and Jiri (thanks to both of you and all the others) I think we should try to keep the 2+2 week release schedule outlined above. One note: Althought especially Karl, Jiri and Dieter Mücke have been very active fixing bug reports we still have a growing number of these. At the moment we have 203 defects and a total of 374 entries. About 2-3 months ago we had 130 defects which means a big growth. I know it is always more fun to develop fancy new stuff (and Karl's stuff are big improvements for josm), but keeping the bugs low is also important. So I would be happy if some more people keep an eye on the bug tracker and fix this or that bug sometimes. Also helping to get reports reproducable or add valuable information sometimes would be a good idea. We have some long standing bugs which have lots of duplicates and seem to be hard to track down at all. Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available)___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New tested version
2009/8/19 Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de: I made 1981 new tested. Looking to the latest changelog, tells me that there are some minor changes/patches which should not be unfixed for the net month. So it is probably better to set the tomorrow version as the next tested version of the month. Ciao André [1] http://josm.openstreetmap.de/log/?verbose=on ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
Re: [josm-dev] New tested version
Hi, I made 1981 new tested. Looking to the latest changelog, tells me that there are some minor changes/patches which should not be unfixed for the net month. So it is probably better to set the tomorrow version as the next tested version of the month. phew, I did some last minute changes to the presets then. I hope I didn't screw it up. -- Beste Grüße, Best regards, ce ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
