On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 09:59:30PM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:58:21PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
> >> > On 09/08/2016 05:50 PM, A
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:58:21PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> > On 09/08/2016 05:50 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> It sounds like new feature territory, but you
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:58:21PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
> > On 09/08/2016 05:50 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
> > >
> > >> It sounds like new feature territory, but you do make a case for it
> being considered a set of fixes ...
> > >
> >
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:58:21PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 09/08/2016 05:50 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
> >
> >> It sounds like new feature territory, but you do make a case for it being
> >> considered a set of fixes ...
> >
> > I agree - it straddles a line. I was hesitant to even ask,
Ben Pfaff writes:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 11:09:39AM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote:
>> Ben Pfaff writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:58:21PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> >> On 09/08/2016 05:50 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> It sounds like new feature territory, but you do ma
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 11:09:39AM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Ben Pfaff writes:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:58:21PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
> >> On 09/08/2016 05:50 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> It sounds like new feature territory, but you do make a case for
> >> > it bein
Ben Pfaff writes:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:58:21PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 09/08/2016 05:50 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
>> >
>> >> It sounds like new feature territory, but you do make a case for
>> > it being considered a set of fixes ...
>> >
>> > I agree - it straddles a line. I
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:58:21PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 09/08/2016 05:50 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
> >
> >> It sounds like new feature territory, but you do make a case for it being
> >> considered a set of fixes ...
> >
> > I agree - it straddles a line. I was hesitant to even ask,
On 09/08/2016 05:50 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
>
>> It sounds like new feature territory, but you do make a case for it being
>> considered a set of fixes ...
>
> I agree - it straddles a line. I was hesitant to even ask, but in RHEL
> we probably need to backport these anyway, so I made an assump
Russell Bryant writes:
>> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Aaron Conole wrote:
>>
>> Greetings all,
>>
>> I'd like to request a backport to branch 2.5 of the following commits:
>>
>>c416eaf8c247225f0ebeb22b6ca5c473e96a53d2 ("ovs-ctl: Remove code for
>> upgrading...")
>>7fc28c50c0128a0
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Greetings all,
>
> I'd like to request a backport to branch 2.5 of the following commits:
>
> c416eaf8c247225f0ebeb22b6ca5c473e96a53d2 ("ovs-ctl: Remove code for
> upgrading...")
> 7fc28c50c0128a0c72853f8f243fd5045bcb9917 ("ovs-ctl: Allow
Greetings all,
I'd like to request a backport to branch 2.5 of the following commits:
c416eaf8c247225f0ebeb22b6ca5c473e96a53d2 ("ovs-ctl: Remove code for
upgrading...")
7fc28c50c0128a0c72853f8f243fd5045bcb9917 ("ovs-ctl: Allow selective start
for...")
0cfd47f9dcc3914db8d266ed834d6e2c8fc1a
12 matches
Mail list logo