[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Arne Limburg reopened OWB-802:
--
Assignee: Arne Limburg (was: Thomas Andraschko)
The current implementation does not work with the CDI
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Arne Limburg resolved OWB-802.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.0
#annotationType() of javax.enterprise:cdi-api not
Hi folks!
I'll reroll the release this evening.
We will _not_ exclude the webbeans-cdi11 module from the source release but we
don't ship any binaries for it.
The reason is that we must not ship any CDI-1.1 binaries without passing the
TCK. But there is no reason not to ship a mechanism to
Hi
Due to a regression in tomee i looked thus case we dont handle anymore but
not sure it is normal with cdi-140:
- take a producer which produces sthg dependent not passivation capable
- inject it in a passivationcapable bean through a constructor
ATM we fail but it should be more or less
Hi Romain,
I think in CDI 1.0 there is a TCK test that requires us to fail. In CDI
1.1 we have the @TransientReference for this scenarios.
Cheers,
Arne
Am 10.05.13 10:05 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau unter
rmannibu...@gmail.com:
Hi
Due to a regression in tomee i looked thus case we dont handle
Ok
Works for me
Thks
Le 10 mai 2013 10:12, Arne Limburg arne.limb...@openknowledge.de a
écrit :
Hi Romain,
I think in CDI 1.0 there is a TCK test that requires us to fail. In CDI
1.1 we have the @TransientReference for this scenarios.
Cheers,
Arne
Am 10.05.13 10:05 schrieb Romain
Is there already a new snapshot available somewhere?
I would try it with my current app.
2013/5/10 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Hi folks!
I'll reroll the release this evening.
We will _not_ exclude the webbeans-cdi11 module from the source release
but we don't ship any binaries for it.
Hi Thomas,
You can build it from trunk
Regards,
Arne
Am 10.05.13 13:36 schrieb Thomas Andraschko unter
andraschko.tho...@gmail.com:
Is there already a new snapshot available somewhere?
I would try it with my current app.
2013/5/10 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Hi folks!
I'll reroll
Yea, but I need to reset the versions to 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT still
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Arne Limburg arne.limb...@openknowledge.de
To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org dev@openwebbeans.apache.org; Mark
Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Cc:
Sent: Friday, 10 May 2013, 15:33
Since the upgrade to 1.2.0 in we have a test failure. There's a servlet with
constructor injection like so:
@Inject
public SimpleServlet(Car car) {
this.car = car;
}
And Car looks like so:
public class Car {
private final String make = Lexus, model = IS 350;
Hi David,
Do I read the log correctly and SimpleServlet is @Dependent? Is
SimpleServlet injected into a passivation-capable bean?
If not, I agree with you that this is a bug.
Cheers,
Arne
Am 10.05.13 22:55 schrieb David Blevins unter david.blev...@gmail.com:
Since the upgrade to 1.2.0 in we
looks like a bug to me.
We should only issue this problem if the injection is into a method, ct or
field which has a passivating scope.
For ct and method injection there will be another factor to consider, which is
a marker whether the injected method should be stored in the CreationalContext
It is a normal failure, see cdi-140
Le 10 mai 2013 23:03, Arne Limburg arne.limb...@openknowledge.de a
écrit :
Hi David,
Do I read the log correctly and SimpleServlet is @Dependent? Is
SimpleServlet injected into a passivation-capable bean?
If not, I agree with you that this is a bug.
Hmm servlet arent passivationcapable for you?
If so tomee integration holds the bug, not owb
Le 10 mai 2013 23:12, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com a écrit :
It is a normal failure, see cdi-140
Le 10 mai 2013 23:03, Arne Limburg arne.limb...@openknowledge.de a
écrit :
Hi David,
Do
David Blevins created OWB-858:
-
Summary: AnnotatedTypeImpl not thread safe
Key: OWB-858
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-858
Project: OpenWebBeans
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-858?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13655131#comment-13655131
]
David Blevins commented on OWB-858:
---
Some sample output from the testcase that reflects the
Excellent. Fixed an issue in OWB that was affecting the TomEE build for a few
days (OWB-858 - AnnotatedTypeImpl not thread safe). Was causing
java.util.ConcurrentModificationExceptions.
Hopefully we can get that in there. Out of time tonight, but would like to
find the issue with
On May 10, 2013, at 2:03 PM, Arne Limburg arne.limb...@openknowledge.de wrote:
Hi David,
Do I read the log correctly and SimpleServlet is @Dependent? Is
SimpleServlet injected into a passivation-capable bean?
If not, I agree with you that this is a bug.
Right. Neither the bean (Car) or
18 matches
Mail list logo
