[jira] [Created] (MEECROWAVE-105) provide a bundled spec api jar

Mark Struberg created MEECROWAVE-105: Summary: provide a bundled spec api jar Key: MEECROWAVE-105 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-105 Project: Meecrowave Issue

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1221) Upgrade to asm 6

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16396867#comment-16396867 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on OWB-1221: - GitHub user jgallimore opened a pull request:

[GitHub] openwebbeans pull request #6: Backport ASM 6 update from trunk

GitHub user jgallimore opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/6 Backport ASM 6 update from trunk You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/jgallimore/openwebbeans owb_1.2.x_asm6 Alternatively

[GitHub] openwebbeans pull request #7: OWB-1221 asm 6 upgrade

GitHub user jgallimore opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/7 OWB-1221 asm 6 upgrade Backport ASM 6 update from trunk. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/jgallimore/openwebbeans

Re: providing a spec-api bundle?

+1, i use meecrowave-core in scope compile so didnt hit that need but I fully understand it - had the same when was running after real portability. I wouldnt call it meecrowave-spec-apis but that's a minor point (meecrowave-api is not perfect too but less weird than specs and api*s* for me, maybe

providing a spec-api bundle?

Hi folks! I just did hack on a small Meecrowave sample with Sven Ruppert and got good feedback. One of his input is that the hardest part seems to be pulling together the various spec versions. So people seem to appreciate if we would provide a 'meecrowave-spec-apis' uberjar where we bundle