Adding CosmosDB Cache Invalidation Service (#4314)

2019-07-24 Thread Chetan Mehrotra
Hi Team, PR #4314 which adds a new service for invalidating cache when running with CosmosDB is now reviewed. I plan to merge this tomorrow unless any other aspect need to be addressed. Chetan Mehrotra [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4314

Re: Video+notes posted from today's tech. int. call

2019-07-24 Thread Rodric Rabbah
Thanks Matt for the notes. Sorry I couldn’t make it today. I’ll go through the repo list from Dave and Chetan for my suggested list of repos to retire. I’ll do that tomorrow. -r > On Jul 24, 2019, at 1:13 PM, Matt Rutkowski wrote: > > First post-grad. meeting! > > video:

Re: stricter scancode: now rejecting minified license headers

2019-07-24 Thread Matt Rutkowski
Headers to full... https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4568 On 2019/07/24 15:04:33, "David P Grove" wrote: > > > I just merged [1] which enforces the stricter license header conventions in > scancode (only use full header, not minified) that we discussed on the dev > list about

Re: Openwhisk prewar containers

2019-07-24 Thread Tyson Norris
Hi Adam - Currently there is no support for prewarming blackbox containers. If you need prewarm support, you can add them to the runtimes manifest configured in your deployment, define prewarm configs for each there, and reference them from actions using "--kind ". Best Tyson On 7/24/19,

Openwhisk prewar containers

2019-07-24 Thread Adam Versano
Hi, I’m running Openwhisk on rancher for my production env. I'm using kubernetes factory My actions are written in go and compiled, so they are of kind blackbox. Is there any way I can prewarm this actions? Thanks [SigmaDots logo] [Youtube

reason parameter for wskadmin tool

2019-07-24 Thread Steffen Rost
I would like to propose the possibility to store in addition the reason for setting a certain limit using the wskadmin tool. This will help others to understand why limits are stored for a certain namespace when revisiting them. I already opened a pull request to add a single limit parameter

RE: stricter scancode: now rejecting minified license headers

2019-07-24 Thread Matt Rutkowski
I have a stricter config ready to go in a local branch... can remove "tests" and other exclusions (but it will have more impacts am sure). Kind regards, Matt From: Rodric Rabbah To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org Date: 07/24/2019 10:31 AM Subject:[EXTERNAL] Re: stricter scancode:

Video+notes posted from today's tech. int. call

2019-07-24 Thread Matt Rutkowski
First post-grad. meeting! video: https://youtu.be/x_MtqtYyLQw notes: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENWHISK/2019-07-24+OW+Tech+Interchange+-+Meeting+Notes Chetan kindly agreed to host the next call sched. for Aug. 7th

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache OpenWhisk Client JS Release v3.20.0

2019-07-24 Thread James Thomas
Definitely - looking back at the thread[1], these were the issues raised: - A large number of .js files in the test directory and many other places don’t have the correct ASF header. - the LICENSE incorrectly includes "Copyright 2015-2016 IBM Corporation” in the appendix - Info in package.json

Re: add reason parameter for wskadmin tool

2019-07-24 Thread Rodric Rabbah
Thanks Steffen for adding this feature. I agree it's useful. Could you add a test for the change? In terms of divergence between wskadmin and wskadmin-next, I propose that we separately deprecate wskadmin and all new features are added to wskadmin-next. -r On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 6:28 AM

Re: stricter scancode: now rejecting minified license headers

2019-07-24 Thread Rodric Rabbah
The scancode configuration is excluding the tests/data/actions directory. Since we're not bundling tests in the releases, I suppose that was OK in the past. But we should be including tests, and in any case we should remove this exclusion and review the scan code exclusions to make sure they're

Re: stricter scancode: now rejecting minified license headers

2019-07-24 Thread Rodric Rabbah
We've got a gap somewhere. https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/blob/master/tests/dat/actions/argsPrint.js and several other js files in the tests use the short license. -r On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:04 AM David P Grove wrote: > > > I just merged [1] which enforces the stricter

stricter scancode: now rejecting minified license headers

2019-07-24 Thread David P Grove
I just merged [1] which enforces the stricter license header conventions in scancode (only use full header, not minified) that we discussed on the dev list about a month ago. Matt has gone through a large number of repos and updated all the license headers, so hopefully we are ready for the

Re: Agenda for Tech. Int. call today

2019-07-24 Thread Sven Lange-Last
Hello Matt, sorry, I won't be able to participate today. I'm planning to participate more frequently in future. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards, Sven Lange-Last Senior Software Engineer IBM Cloud Functions Apache OpenWhisk E-mail: sven.lange-l...@de.ibm.com Find me on: Schoenaicher

Agenda for Tech. Int. call today

2019-07-24 Thread Matt Rutkowski
Any more topics? Scanning PR and dev lists here are the topics I gleaned: * PR review (e.g., Rodric/Carlos//Tyson, etc.) * [Scheduler] Initial commit for Scheduler #4547 (Dom) * https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4547 * TBD * Add option for appending

Re: [REMINDER] Technical Interchange Call TOMORROW! submit topics!

2019-07-24 Thread Matt Rutkowski
Topics anyone? scanning PR and dev lists here are the topics I gleaned: * PR review (e.g., Rodric/Carlos//Tyson, etc.) * [Scheduler] Initial commit for Scheduler #4547 (Dom) * https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4547 * TBD * Add option for appending

add reason parameter for wskadmin tool

2019-07-24 Thread Steffen Rost
I would like to propose the possibility to store in addition the reason for setting a certain limit using the wskadmin tool. This will help others to understand why limits are stored for a certain namespace when revisiting them. I already opened a pull request to add a single limit parameter

[slack-digest] [2019-07-23] #website

2019-07-24 Thread OpenWhisk Team Slack
2019-07-23 14:27:59 UTC - Dave Grove: Thanks for the report; submitted a PR to remove the link (was leftover from before Kubernetes was available in stable Docker for Mac/Windows) https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C9J8P2CQ1/p1563892079001800?thread_ts=1563839714.001200=C9J8P2CQ1

[slack-digest] [2019-07-23] #general

2019-07-24 Thread OpenWhisk Team Slack
2019-07-23 03:05:42 UTC - chris: @Satwik Kolhe sorry i can't totally understand what you say :disappointed_relieved: https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1563851142087900?thread_ts=1563774675.008600=C3TPCAQG1 2019-07-23 03:13:24 UTC - chris: @Satwik Kolhe is it possible that

Re: housecleaning of openwhisk git repos

2019-07-24 Thread Chetan Mehrotra
Below is the list if repo with last pushed date from which we can decide what we can keep and what can be archived. Probably repo which have not been updated after 2017 can be archived for now 1 | incubator-openwhisk| 2019-07-24 2 | incubator-openwhisk-website