Re: A proposal for a more efficient implementation of Go actions

implement. It'd be great to run some performance tests once you have created this new runtime to validate the expected performance improvement. -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: A proposal for a more efficient implementation of Go actions

ly. > > Can I use your code? You know, you should have signed the contributor > agreement (as I did) and place the code under the Apache license... > > -- > Michele Sciabarra > mich...@sciabarra.com > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018, at 12:56 PM, James Thomas wrote: >

Re: A proposal for a more efficient implementation of Go actions

sabled this explicitly at one point, >> but I don't foresee a show stopper yet. >> >> -r >> -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: Welcome new Committer James Thomas

com> wrote: > OpenWhiskers, > > Based on his ongoing and valuable contributions to the project, the > OpenWhisk PPMC has elected James Thomas as a Committer as well as PPMC > member and he has > accepted the invitation. > > Please join me in welcoming him! > > James,

Re: list etiquette: job postings?

+1 On 7 Dec 2017 11:51 a.m., "Carlos Santana" wrote: > +1 > > Also add to the policy that posting should make it clear that is not the > ASF hiring :-) > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 6:49 AM Michael Marth > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > as you might (or

Re: OpenWhisk NodeJS 8 support

new promisify >> here is some good read on this: >> http://2ality.com/2017/05/util-promisify.html >> >> I have a WIP PR with the support here >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-runtime-nodejs/pull/5 >> >> There are few things I want to see if we can improve and take the chance >> to it since this will be a new kind. I added a list in the PR >> >> I have no issue opened because the repo is not enable with Issues, that's >> why I put the details in the PR >> >> -- Carlos >> >> -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: Next Tech Interchange meeting

meeting of delaying it a >>> week as it's Thanksgiving in the US this week. >>>> >>>> I think it'd be better to just skip this week's meeting and have the >>> next meeting on 6th December. I'm pretty sure I can make that day, so am >>> willing to host (at some level of competence). >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>>> >>>> >>>> Rob... >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: Upcoming OpenWhisk "Tech Interchange" Meeting - November 8th 2017.

) -> Updating Runtimes (Carlos Santana & James Thomas 15 minutes) -> Swift 4 Runtime & Codable support -> Node.js 8 & async/await support 4. Find and confirm moderator for next meeting (2 min) * - "If Docker has captains, OpenWhisk can have pirates" On

Re: Feed Provider API v2?

pi key is revoke, to tell the feed provider > to update replace all the trigger with the old key, and use the new key > > [1]: https://github.com/abaruni > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:39 AM James Thomas <ja...@jamesthom.as> wrote: > > > Users are running into l

Feed Provider API v2?

ges can be reviewed for updating where relevant. Hopefully this message can spark some discussion, feeds are a really important part of the openwhisk platform. I'm happy to also introduce this on the video call next week? -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: Updating Package and Language versions for a kind

> >> >[2]: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/2120 > >> >[3]: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/319 > >> > > >> > > >> >> On 14 Jul 2017, at 16:27, Michael Marth <mma...@adobe.com.INVALID> &g

Re: Minutes & Video posted for "OW Tech Interchange" kickoff call

2017-07-19+OW+Tech+ > Interchange+-+Meeting+Notes > > Video on our YouTube (Apache Meetings playlist): > https://youtu.be/bqh3ynIF8mM > > Feel free to comment/fill in anything I may have missed. > > Kind regards, > Matt > > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: Propose BI-WEEKLY "Technical Exchange" Zoom meeting for OpenWhisk staring next Wed. 19th

ecting: Greet new people and hear their interest and help them > connect with others. > - Volunteers: identify key code work areas where we need help and seek > volunteers. > > > Before we event start we would need to… > > - Have an initial pool of volunteer moderators (of course I would > volunteer to be one and help jump start the processes) > - Develop a list of agenda topics here on mailing lists and CWIKI that is > large enough to start the first meeting and have enough topics to keep it > going > > > Please provide feedback on this proposal as I would welcome any support > and ideas that could make this better if we agree this is a good idea. > > > Cheers! > Matt > > > > > > > > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: Improving support for UI driven use cases

valid at all. I think it was also already noted, that this > imposes some of the "old-fashioned" problems on the user, like: How many > concurrent requests will my action be able to handle? That kinda defeats > the seemless-scalability point of serverless. > > Cheers, > Markus > > -- Regards, James Thomas

Action Container Packages Versions

refresh process every X weeks or months to ensure they are current? I've opened a PR to update the Swift runtime but thought it might be useful to discuss this broader issue. https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/2374 -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: Requested new "low hanging fruit" (i.e., "lhf") label for Issues

ssues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14318 > > > > The actual label would be "lhf" once it gets created and hope we can make > > good use of it once it is active. Will add that to our CWIKI > > documentation once enabled as well. > > > > Kind regards, > > Matt > > > > > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: PassportJS with OpenWhisk

at listen to events from a variety of 3rd > party providers on behalf of the users, and then be able to do something > useful on user’s behalf; user authentication plays an important role in > this. To some extent I’ve also been thinking what it would be like for > developers if this feature would come with the OW catalog. > > > Looking forward to hearing your feedback, > > Dragos > -- Regards, James Thomas

Re: New ContainerPool

flag for functions. Happy to discuss some of the challenges and issues I found getting this to work if people are interested. On 4 April 2017 at 22:54, Michael M Behrendt <michaelbehre...@de.ibm.com> wrote: > Hi Dragos, > > James Thomas has done some work around zipkin & open

<    1   2