Re: [DISCUSS] - prepare to release OpenWhisk catalog

2019-06-28 Thread Rodric Rabbah
> We can either (a) wait out a release cycle of clientgo/cli/wskdeploy to get a > fixed cli or (b) leave the bash installers in for this release and cleanup > after the next cli release. I would do it later then. -r

Re: [DISCUSS] - prepare to release OpenWhisk catalog

2019-06-28 Thread Dave Grove
On 2019/06/17 13:07:33, Rodric Rabbah wrote: > If the weather package is functional and can run with newer node kinds then > I’d favor keeping it. I verified weather is functional with nodejs:10. Have a PR pending to update the documentation. Will merge as soon as the current travis

Re: [DISCUSS] - prepare to release OpenWhisk catalog

2019-06-20 Thread James Thomas
+1 to everything Rodric said! On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 at 14:07, Rodric Rabbah wrote: > > If the weather package is functional and can run with newer node kinds then > I’d favor keeping it. > > I’d favor removing the combinators as we have composer now and we didn’t > document them properly (my

Re: [DISCUSS] - prepare to release OpenWhisk catalog

2019-06-17 Thread Rodric Rabbah
If the weather package is functional and can run with newer node kinds then I’d favor keeping it. I’d favor removing the combinators as we have composer now and we didn’t document them properly (my fault). I would consider removing the bash installers since they’re redundant with the wsk

[DISCUSS] - prepare to release OpenWhisk catalog

2019-06-17 Thread David P Grove
As Rodric mentioned in [1], the catalog is the last package we need to release before we can start on the main repo. This is a discussion thread to figure out what (if anything) needs to be done before we can start the release process. Here are three questions I have: 1. Should we remove the