/docs/license_compliance.md
--
Regards,
James Thomas
ch OpenWhisk repository.
> > [ ] All files have license headers as specified by OpenWhisk project
> > policy [1].
> > [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> >
> > This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> >
> > [1]
> > https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/blob/master/docs/license_compliance.md
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
n is: 'Does the result
> > contain an error field?'). But also other decision logic may be
> > applicable.
> >
> > This PR https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4604 is a small change
> > that extends ActivationFileStorage.
> >
> > Please help and comment on the PR.
> >
> > Thank you, Ruediger
> >
> >
--
Regards,
James Thomas
/openwhisk/apache-openwhisk-3.20.0/
--
Regards,
James Thomas
The voting is now closed. The vote has PASSED with 4 +1 binding votes from
Dominic Kim, Matt Rutkowski, Dave Grove and Rob Allen. There were no
+0 or -1 votes.
I will now publish the artifact to the release directory.
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 12:32, James Thomas wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Th
Rat 0.13 and
> found no other problems.
>
> --dave
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-js/pull/189
>
> On 2019/08/01 15:44:50, James Thomas wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is a call to vote on releasing version 3.20.0 release candidate
>
| 2017-07-12
> 47| incubator-openwhisk-podspecs | 2017-07-12
> 48| incubator-openwhisk-client-python | 2017-07-10
> 49| incubator-openwhisk-package-jira | 2017-07-10
> 50| incubator-openwhisk-selfserve-test | 2017-06-26
> 51| incubator-openwhisk-GitHubSlackBot | 2017-03-16
> 52| incubator-openwhisk-sample-slackbot| 2017-01-25
--
Regards,
James Thomas
is now being added
> > > > to launch the Api Gateway with Standalone Server [1]. With this it
> > > > should be possible to direct new OpenWhisk users to use the Standalone
> > > > server to try out various features provided by OpenWhisk
> > > >
> > > > So far tests look fine and would now like to seek some feedback from
> > > > community on this feature. For this it would be helpful if you can try
> > > > out a beta build and see if it works as expected
> > > >
> > > > # Fetch custom docker build of apigateway which has
> > > > apache/incubator-openwhisk-apigateway#347 fixed
> > > > $ docker pull chetanmeh/apigateway
> > > >
> > > > # Download the openwhisk-standalone jar
> > > > $ wget
> > > >
> > > https://github.com/chetanmeh/incubator-openwhisk/releases/download/0.11/openwhisk-standalone.jar
> > > > $ java -Dwhisk.standalone.api-gateway.image=chetanmeh/apigateway -jar
> > > > openwhisk-standalone.jar --api-gw
> > > >
> > > > Post this you can use the steps as mentioned in [2] to check out the
> > > > gateway support.
> > > >
> > > > Please share any feedback on #4571 or this mail thread
> > > >
> > > > Chetan Mehrotra
> > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4571
> > > > [2]
> > > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/blob/master/docs/apigateway.md
> > > >
> > >
--
Regards,
James Thomas
idual steps manually.
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/293
--
Regards,
James Thomas
lease.
[ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repository.
[ ] All files have license headers as specified by OpenWhisk project
policy [1].
[ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours.
--
Regards,
James Thomas
e quite different, the
> > method of migrating a package name is similarly not well-defined in
> > both systems.
> >
> > Does anyone have more info about how NPM runs their repository? Maybe
> > they can add in some redirects of some sort.
> >
> > On Mon, 15
p
> > Change the Apache HBase Project Chair (Duo Zhang, VP)
> > Establish the Apache OpenWhisk Project (Dave Grove, VP)
> > Change the Apache Attic Project Chair (Mads Toftum, VP)
>
>
> \o/
>
> Rob
--
Regards,
James Thomas
67643.html
On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 at 17:16, Rodric Rabbah wrote:
>
> This will be the first release post graduation. I’d like to make sure we’ve
> gone through and closed issues raised in previous incubator votes.
>
> -r
>
> > On Jul 22, 2019, at 12:10 PM, James Thomas wr
; that would be my preferred choice.
> >
> > However, I feel that, given our Scala background, Rust would be a much
> better choice for the KnativeWhisk controller. So I propose to use Rust
> for the KwhiskController.
> >
> > What does the community think of the proposal?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Michele Sciabarra
> > mich...@sciabarra.com
> >
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
[2] - following NPM JS module conventions - apache-openwhisk is much
preferable than a single word (apacheopenwhisk).
--
Regards,
James Thomas
/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-js/issues/162
[2 - https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-js/issues/158
& https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-js/issues/159
[3] - https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-js/issues/177
--
Regards,
James Thomas
ICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repository.
> [ ] All files have license headers as specified by OpenWhisk project
> policy [1].
> [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
>
> This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours.
>
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/blob/master/docs/license_compliance.md
--
Regards,
James Thomas
+1
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 19:27, Matt Rutkowski wrote:
> +1 All for keeping our clients updated and released regularly.
>
>
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
101 - 118 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
