Hi Dominic,
Lean OpenWhisk is not supposed to run on the IoT devices such as sensors and
actuators directly. It's supposed to run on a Gateway node that controls the
sensors and actuators connected to it. Think AWS GreenGrass, Azure Functions on
IoT Edge. This is the same use case. The data
> -- david
>
>
>
>
> From: TzuChiao Yeh
> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
> Date: 17/07/2018 05:49 PM
> Subject:Re: Proposing Lean OpenWhisk
>
>
>
> Hi David,
>
> Looks cool! Glad to see OpenWhisk step forward to the edge use case.
>
>
term) and will be happy to discuss this.
Cheers.
-- david
From: TzuChiao Yeh
To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
Date: 17/07/2018 05:49 PM
Subject:Re: Proposing Lean OpenWhisk
Hi David,
Looks cool! Glad to see OpenWhisk step forward to the edge use case.
Simple question
;
> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
> Date: 17/07/2018 04:31 PM
> Subject:Re: Proposing Lean OpenWhisk
>
>
>
> Hi David,
>
> I absolutely agree, this should not be held back. It'd be great if you
> could chime in on the discussion I opened on the new proposal reg
Sure. Will do directly on Wiki.
Cheers.
-- david
From: "Markus Thoemmes"
To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
Date: 17/07/2018 04:31 PM
Subject: Re: Proposing Lean OpenWhisk
Hi David,
I absolutely agree, this should not be held back. It'd be great if you
c
Hi David,
I absolutely agree, this should not be held back. It'd be great if you could
chime in on the discussion I opened on the new proposal regarding your use-case
though. It might be nice to verify a similar topology as you are proposing is
still implementable or maybe even easier to
Hi Markus,
Thanks for the prompt response and the pointer to your proposal. Indeed,
there is a synergy between this Lean OW proposal and the more far fetching
changes that you suggest. The similarity is that Invoker's role is
basically being done by controller with no Kafka in between to
Glad to see this work reaching maturity. As Markus noted I think there could be
more convergence down the line too.
Looking forward to the PR.
-r
> On Jul 16, 2018, at 4:17 AM, David Breitgand wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Pavel and I are working on lean OpenWhisk. The idea is to allow an efficient
Dear David.
This is an awesome idea!!
Is this to control IoT devices programmatically?
If yes, there would be many different types of IoT devices especially in
terms of their capabilities such as lighting sensors, thermometer, robot
cleaner, and so on.
Then do you have anything in mind to take
Hi David,
please send your PR for sure! IIRC we made the Loadbalancer pluggable
specifically for this use-case. Sounds like a great addition to our possible
deployment topologies.
Shameless plug: Would you review the architecture I proposed here:
Hi,
Pavel and I are working on lean OpenWhisk. The idea is to allow an
efficient use of OpenWhisk with small form factor compute nodes (e.g., IoT
gateways). The proposition is to get rid of Kafka, have controller and
invoker compiled together into a "lean" controller-invoker (have a Gradle
11 matches
Mail list logo
