Re: Upcoming OpenWhisk releases

g Date: 03/15/2018 07:24 AM Subject: Re: Upcoming OpenWhisk releases There are a few changes that affect the REST API and schema that we might want to consider since they are subject to ongoing work: 1. Log separation from the activation record (schema) 2. Result separatio

Re: Upcoming OpenWhisk releases

Yep I forgot the “"-incubating" :-) Yes the folder will contain other files like sha signature files - Carlos Santana @csantanapr > On Mar 15, 2018, at 9:34 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > "-incubating"

Re: Upcoming OpenWhisk releases

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 1:28 PM, Carlos Santana wrote: > ...Not sure what are the Apache policy if any about 0.x and 1.x ... There's no ASF policy for that, but a common perception than a 1.x release is "reasonably finished", whatever that means. Note also that's it's

Re: Upcoming OpenWhisk releases

Not sure what are the Apache policy if any about 0.x and 1.x Do you have PRs or Issues for the 3 items below. It’s doesn’t matter if we go from 0.x to 1.x or 1.x to 2.x we have to discuss which items are be included and waited on to make the cut to a new version. So I’m OK with 0.x or 1.x if

Re: Upcoming OpenWhisk releases

There are a few changes that affect the REST API and schema that we might want to consider since they are subject to ongoing work: 1. Log separation from the activation record (schema) 2. Result separation from the activation record (schema) 3. Treating code blobs as first class resources (API,

Re: Upcoming OpenWhisk releases

We should have “-incubating” at the end of the version number. As long we are incubating. After TLP we can drop the it Version should follow semver format and pratices. MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH MAJOR=1 since it’s the first release. Controller/Whisk API denotes the version 1.y.z And we should try

Re: Upcoming OpenWhisk releases

Hi Carlos, Re the 1.0.0 in "1.0.0-incubating" below: I cannot recall a discussion on the actual version number for the first release (sorry, in case I missed it). I wonder whether we intend to follow SemVer. If yes, then releasing as 1.0 would mean we would not change the external APIs in an

Re: Upcoming OpenWhisk releases

Sorry replied from mobile Here is the link https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release - Carlos Santana @csantanapr > On Mar 15, 2018, at 7:20 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Carlos Santana >>

Re: Upcoming OpenWhisk releases

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Carlos Santana wrote: > ...No other discussions are going about release other than what’s in the > release repo... What's the URL of that? (asking candidly, but also as having those links here is what we need, as in "talking in URLs" ;-)

Re: Upcoming OpenWhisk releases

Yes I agree Bertram 100% I have being following the Github issues and PRs in the issues and commits mailing lists No other discussions are going about release other than what’s in the release repo that Vincent and Daisy are attacking and the discussions that both are bringing to the dev

Upcoming OpenWhisk releases

Hi, AFAICS releases have been discussed in your calls, with my incubation mentor hat on I'd like to stress the importance of discussing those here or at least exposing pointers to discussions here if they are happening somewhere else, like in issue tracker tickets. I am consciously not following