shangxinli edited a comment on pull request #808:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/pull/808#issuecomment-672999165
Thanks @ggershinsky @gszadovszky for spending time on the discussion! If
both of you think adding 'metadata' field is not a good idea, I will just use
Configuration
shangxinli commented on pull request #808:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/pull/808#issuecomment-672999165
Thanks @ggershinsky @gszadovszky for spending time on the discussion! If
both of you think adding 'metadata' field is not a good idea, I will just use
Configuration and see
ggershinsky commented on pull request #808:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/pull/808#issuecomment-672788803
> I don't agree we cannot have a meeting about this topic in terms of
transparency. What we have to do is to document here about what we have
discussed and what are the
gszadovszky commented on pull request #808:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/pull/808#issuecomment-672774756
@shangxinli,
If we will agree on the extending of the schema with metadata is a good idea
and as you said the serialization/deserialization is also required we need to
Thanks a lot, Dan. I've created PARQUET-1897 to track this.
With three +1 binding votes and an additional +1 vote this release vote
passes.
Thank you all who have voted.
I'll finalize the release today.
Cheers,
Gabor
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 9:11 PM Daniel C. Weeks wrote:
> +1 (binding)
Gabor Szadovszky created PARQUET-1897:
-
Summary: Failing individual module build/test
Key: PARQUET-1897
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1897
Project: Parquet
Issue
ggershinsky commented on pull request #808:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/pull/808#issuecomment-672750035
@shangxinli Indeed, my understanding of this pull request is accurately
described by "'how to transport the settings from the extended
ParquetWriteSupport to
