[GitHub] [parquet-mr] maccamlc commented on pull request #798: PARQUET-1879 MapKeyValue is not a valid Logical Type

2020-06-29 Thread GitBox
maccamlc commented on pull request #798: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/pull/798#issuecomment-651009716 > @maccamlc, > > The main problem I think is that the spec does not say anything about how the thrift objects shall be used. The specification is about the semantics of

[GitHub] [parquet-mr] maccamlc commented on pull request #798: PARQUET-1879 MapKeyValue is not a valid Logical Type

2020-06-27 Thread GitBox
maccamlc commented on pull request #798: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/pull/798#issuecomment-650527774 @gszadovszky before this gets merged, I just wanted to clarify something myself after looking more into the format spec, that might tidy this issue up further. * Is MAP

[GitHub] [parquet-mr] maccamlc commented on pull request #798: PARQUET-1879 MapKeyValue is not a valid Logical Type

2020-06-25 Thread GitBox
maccamlc commented on pull request #798: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/pull/798#issuecomment-649482253 > Thank you for creating the backward compatibility test for Map. It should have been existed already. > Unfortunately, this way you do not properly test backward compatibil

[GitHub] [parquet-mr] maccamlc commented on pull request #798: PARQUET-1879 MapKeyValue is not a valid Logical Type

2020-06-24 Thread GitBox
maccamlc commented on pull request #798: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/pull/798#issuecomment-649202469 > Thanks for working on this. > > You have changed every naming from `"map"` to `"key_value"` in the tests. This is good for the expected data but we should keep testing