Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

I've to rerun the release as some bits are missing BR Andreas Am 15.10.2015 um 20:12 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, Am 15.10.2015 um 19:29 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Am 15.10.2015 um 19:27 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Am 14.10.2015 um 19:09 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Just a friendly r

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

I've added an initial migration guide which can be reviewed at http://pdfbox.staging.apache.org/2.0/migration.html Changes etc at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-3030 BR Marua

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Hi, Am 15.10.2015 um 19:29 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Am 15.10.2015 um 19:27 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Am 14.10.2015 um 19:09 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Just a friendly reminder. I'm going to cut the release in round about 24 hours from now. I've aggressively set most 2.0 issues to resolved

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Am 15.10.2015 um 19:27 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Am 14.10.2015 um 19:09 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Just a friendly reminder. I'm going to cut the release in round about 24 hours from now. I've aggressively set most 2.0 issues to resolved or removed them from 2.0, where possible. We're down

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Am 14.10.2015 um 19:09 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Just a friendly reminder. I'm going to cut the release in round about 24 hours from now. I've aggressively set most 2.0 issues to resolved or removed them from 2.0, where possible. We're down to 3 left: - PDFBOX-2893

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Hi, > Am 14.10.2015 um 19:09 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > > Am 09.10.2015 um 12:51 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: >> Hi, >> >> in a quick discussion on private@pdfbox we agreed to cut a new release next >> week >> on october 15th. There are some questions which should be answered be

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

I'll be sure to put the rendering capabilities through their paces. I'm adjusting my .net app to use 2.0 this week. On Oct 14, 2015 6:15 PM, "Tilman Hausherr" wrote: > Am 14.10.2015 um 23:05 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: > >> Hi, >> >> Am 14.10.2015 um 21:10 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: >> >>> Am 14.1

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Am 14.10.2015 um 23:05 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, Am 14.10.2015 um 21:10 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Am 14.10.2015 um 19:09 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, Am 09.10.2015 um 12:51 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Hi, in a quick discussion on private@pdfbox we agreed to cut a new release nex

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Hi, Am 14.10.2015 um 21:10 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Am 14.10.2015 um 19:09 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, Am 09.10.2015 um 12:51 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Hi, in a quick discussion on private@pdfbox we agreed to cut a new release next week on october 15th. There are some questions which

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Am 14.10.2015 um 19:09 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, Am 09.10.2015 um 12:51 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Hi, in a quick discussion on private@pdfbox we agreed to cut a new release next week on october 15th. There are some questions which should be answered before: Just a friendly reminder

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Hi, Am 09.10.2015 um 12:51 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Hi, in a quick discussion on private@pdfbox we agreed to cut a new release next week on october 15th. There are some questions which should be answered before: Just a friendly reminder. I'm going to cut the release in round about 24 hours

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

> On 9 Oct 2015, at 03:51, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: > > Hi, > > in a quick discussion on private@pdfbox we agreed to cut a new release next > week > on october 15th. There are some questions which should be answered before: > > - Are we still in the same boat? Are there any concerns not to d

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Am 12.10.2015 um 12:58 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: Hi, Am 12.10.2015 um 12:32 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler : Hi, Maruan Sahyoun hat am 9. Oktober 2015 um 13:01 geschrieben: Hi, SNIP Did I forget anything else? Maybe we should announce a date when we would like to go from RC to final - 15t

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Hi, > Am 12.10.2015 um 12:32 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler : > > Hi, > >> Maruan Sahyoun hat am 9. Oktober 2015 um 13:01 >> geschrieben: >> >> >> Hi, >> > > SNIP > >>> Did I forget anything else? >>> >> >> Maybe we should announce a date when we would like to go from RC to final - >> 15th o

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Hi, > Maruan Sahyoun hat am 9. Oktober 2015 um 13:01 > geschrieben: > > > Hi, > SNIP > > Did I forget anything else? > > > > Maybe we should announce a date when we would like to go from RC to final - > 15th of November ? I'm ok with that, but I can't confirm the supposed date as I won't b

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Am 09.10.2015 um 12:51 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Hi, in a quick discussion on private@pdfbox we agreed to cut a new release next week on october 15th. There are some questions which should be answered before: - Are we still in the same boat? Are there any concerns not to do a release and post

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Hi, yes, we should do a RC as proposed by you. I would say we will strive for keeping the API stable (or do only backward compatible changes/additions), however this mostly depends on the user feedback we get. I would also support an expected date for the final release as Maruan proposed. B

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Hi, > Am 09.10.2015 um 12:51 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler : > > Hi, > > in a quick discussion on private@pdfbox we agreed to cut a new release next > week > on october 15th. There are some questions which should be answered before: > > - Are we still in the same boat? Are there any concerns not

PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Hi, in a quick discussion on private@pdfbox we agreed to cut a new release next week on october 15th. There are some questions which should be answered before: - Are we still in the same boat? Are there any concerns not to do a release and postpone it? - RC or "real" release? If we do a RC the f

Re: FW: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Am 31.08.2015 um 22:50 schrieb Ruhong Cai: -Original Message- From: Ruhong Cai Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 1:31 PM To: dev@pdfbox.apache.org Subject: RE: PDFBox 2.0.0 release Hi, The following code could prove that there is a bug in getting the number of the pages PDDocument pdf1

FW: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

-Original Message- From: Ruhong Cai Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 1:31 PM To: dev@pdfbox.apache.org Subject: RE: PDFBox 2.0.0 release Hi, The following code could prove that there is a bug in getting the number of the pages PDDocument pdf1 = PDDocument.load("C:\\ms12_TIM.pdf&qu

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

> On 9 Jul 2015, at 06:10, Allison, Timothy B. wrote: > >>> Perhaps getting a “big” user, such as Tika onboard will give us proof that >>> 2.0 is ready for production? Some APIs are still in flux, e.g. font mapping >>> has undergone recent changes to handle CJK better. > > Consider us onboard

RE: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

>> Perhaps getting a “big” user, such as Tika onboard will give us proof that >> 2.0 is ready for production? Some APIs are still in flux, e.g. font mapping >> has undergone recent changes to handle CJK better. Consider us onboard. Our dev version of Tika with 2.0.0-trunk is here: https://gith

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

> On 9 Jul 2015, at 03:05, John Hewson wrote: > > >> On 6 Jul 2015, at 10:08, Tilman Hausherr wrote: >> >> Yes it would be great that the 2.0 version be released. Before the opening >> of the new Berlin airport. >> >> IMO only the following issues are important for 2.0: >> - PDFBOX-2301 - R

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

> On 6 Jul 2015, at 10:08, Tilman Hausherr wrote: > > Yes it would be great that the 2.0 version be released. Before the opening of > the new Berlin airport. > > IMO only the following issues are important for 2.0: > - PDFBOX-2301 - RandomAccessBuffer consumes too much memory - isn't that one

Re: 2.0.0. RC was Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Hi, > Am 07.07.2015 um 09:34 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler : > > Hi, > >> Andreas Lehmkühler hat am 6. Juli 2015 um 11:55 >> geschrieben: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> I'd like to do a 2.0.0 release rather sooner than later and I guess I'm not >> the >> only one ;-) >> >> We are down to 24 issues mar

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

> Tilman Hausherr hat am 6. Juli 2015 um 19:08 > geschrieben: > > > Yes it would be great that the 2.0 version be released. Before the > opening of the new Berlin airport. > > IMO only the following issues are important for 2.0: > - PDFBOX-2301 - RandomAccessBuffer consumes too much memory -

2.0.0. RC was Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Hi, > Andreas Lehmkühler hat am 6. Juli 2015 um 11:55 > geschrieben: > > > Hi, > > > I'd like to do a 2.0.0 release rather sooner than later and I guess I'm not > the > only one ;-) > > We are down to 24 issues marked with "Fix Version 2.0.0". > > @Assignees: please have a look at "your" is

RE: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

@pdfbox.apache.org Subject: Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release Yes it would be great that the 2.0 version be released. Before the opening of the new Berlin airport. IMO only the following issues are important for 2.0: - PDFBOX-2301 - RandomAccessBuffer consumes too much memory - isn't that one

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Hi, > Am 06.07.2015 um 20:31 schrieb Ruhong Cai : > > Hi, > > The following code could prove that there is a bug in getting the number of > the pages > > PDDocument pdf1 = PDDocument.load("C:\\ms12_TIM.pdf"); could you upload the file to a public location to take a look? BR Maruan > > in

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Am 06.07.2015 um 20:31 schrieb Ruhong Cai: Hi, The following code could prove that there is a bug in getting the number of the pages PDDocument pdf1 = PDDocument.load("C:\\ms12_TIM.pdf"); int count = pdf1.getNumberOfPages(); count return “0” , the file has a page. Hi, Could you please up

RE: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Hi, The following code could prove that there is a bug in getting the number of the pages PDDocument pdf1 = PDDocument.load("C:\\ms12_TIM.pdf"); int count = pdf1.getNumberOfPages(); count return “0” , the file has a page. Thanks! Ruhong ---

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Hi, > Am 06.07.2015 um 19:08 schrieb Tilman Hausherr : > > Yes it would be great that the 2.0 version be released. Before the opening of > the new Berlin airport. > > IMO only the following issues are important for 2.0: > - PDFBOX-2301 - RandomAccessBuffer consumes too much memory - isn't that o

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Yes it would be great that the 2.0 version be released. Before the opening of the new Berlin airport. IMO only the following issues are important for 2.0: - PDFBOX-2301 - RandomAccessBuffer consumes too much memory - isn't that one done? - PDFBOX-2370 - Move caching outside of PDResources - I a

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Hi Andreas, I'd also go for a RC to be able to settle down on some additional changes/feedback before releasing. BR Maruan > Am 06.07.2015 um 11:55 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler : > > Hi, > > > I'd like to do a 2.0.0 release rather sooner than later and I guess I'm not > the > only one ;-) >

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Hi, having a 2.0.0 release is what a number of users are waiting for (including me). However this also means that the current flexibility of changing APIs will be stopped and one has to agree to a set of APIs which will change during the 2.0.x cycle only minimal (at least in a compatible way)

PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Hi, I'd like to do a 2.0.0 release rather sooner than later and I guess I'm not the only one ;-) We are down to 24 issues marked with "Fix Version 2.0.0". @Assignees: please have a look at "your" issues and verify if we really should wait for them to be resolved first or if those could be moved