Re: PDFBox 1.8.6 release

Oops, ignore this, I'll work on 2.0 only. Tilman Am 18.06.2014 16:31, schrieb Tilman Hausherr: If possible, please tell again maybe 30min in advance, I'm starting to remove unused imports. Tilman

Re: PDFBox 1.8.6 release

If possible, please tell again maybe 30min in advance, I'm starting to remove unused imports. Tilman Am 18.06.2014 11:54, schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Hi, Andreas Lehmkuehler hat am 11. Juni 2014 um 08:04 geschrieben: Am 28.05.2014 15:10, schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Hi, there are already

Re: PDFBox 1.8.6 release

Hi, > Andreas Lehmkuehler hat am 11. Juni 2014 um 08:04 > geschrieben: > > > Am 28.05.2014 15:10, schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: > > Hi, > > > > there are already a number of solved issues mostly due > > to the hard work of Tilman and I'm thinking about a new > > bugfix release. How about a new one

Re: PDFBox 1.8.6 release

Hi, Am 12.06.2014 07:58, schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: Hi, would you think that https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1512 (TextPositionComparator is not compatible with Java 7) should potentially be handled. Although I haven’t received feedback on it I could move forward implementing it to

Re: PDFBox 1.8.6 release

Hi, would you think that https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1512 (TextPositionComparator is not compatible with Java 7) should potentially be handled. Although I haven’t received feedback on it I could move forward implementing it to reflect other PDF readers handle positions. But I w

Re: PDFBox 1.8.6 release

Hi, Am 11.06.2014 18:02, schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Sure... Could you make a decision on PDFBOX-239 ? I hope "you" isn't "me". Decisions are not limited to me, it's a community thing. If you are ok with it and no one objects, go ahead (see my rece

Re: PDFBox 1.8.6 release

Sure... Could you make a decision on PDFBOX-239 ? And are there any other issues that are to be fixed for 1.8.6? Tilman Am 11.06.2014 08:04, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Am 28.05.2014 15:10, schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Hi, there are alre

Re: PDFBox 1.8.6 release

Am 28.05.2014 15:10, schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Hi, there are already a number of solved issues mostly due to the hard work of Tilman and I'm thinking about a new bugfix release. How about a new one in 2 or 3 weeks from now? WDYT? How about next week, let say wednesday the 18th? BR Andreas

Re: PDFBox 1.8.6 release

On 29 May 2014 12:37, Andreas Lehmkuehler wrote: > Hi, > > > Am 29.05.2014 11:47, schrieb Tilman Hausherr: > >> I didn't do it because I've never used overlays. And I haven't fully >> understood >> >> what you want, maybe this is a language problem on my side. And I suspect >> that >> you're aski

Re: PDFBox 1.8.6 release

Hi, Am 29.05.2014 11:47, schrieb Tilman Hausherr: I didn't do it because I've never used overlays. And I haven't fully understood what you want, maybe this is a language problem on my side. And I suspect that you're asking not for one, but two or three features. (moving into class; PDDocument; c

Re: PDFBox 1.8.6 release

I made some slight changes in your text. Do the changes reflect what you meant? (Sorry, I usually don't do that often) Tilman Am 29.05.2014 11:47, schrieb Tilman Hausherr: And I haven't fully understood what you want, maybe this is a language problem on my side.

Re: PDFBox 1.8.6 release

I didn't do it because I've never used overlays. And I haven't fully understood what you want, maybe this is a language problem on my side. And I suspect that you're asking not for one, but two or three features. (moving into class; PDDocument; cloning) I might help with some basic stuff, i.e.

Re: PDFBox 1.8.6 release

Any chances of getting PDFBOX-1596 in? It has had a patch since February and we're having to locally patch the sources for our own purposes. I'm unsure what else I need to do to it get attention. On 28 May 2014 20:25, Tilman Hausherr wrote: > +1 and thanks. But you were also very active, the l

Re: PDFBox 1.8.6 release

+1 and thanks. But you were also very active, the last weekend was our most productive ever, I think. Although I'm not a statistics guy, I like that the 300 day report https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ConfigureReport.jspa?projectOrFilterId=project-12310760&periodName=daily&daysprevious=300&