Re: PDFReader vs PDFDebugger

Hi, Am 26.07.2015 um 22:00 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler andr...@lehmi.de: Hi, I like all those new features which were added to PDFDebugger lately, as far as I've already found them ;-) I'm thinking about removing PDFReader as PDFDebugger is now able to render single pages as well

Re: PDFReader vs PDFDebugger

Am 27.07.2015 um 07:59 schrieb John Hewson j...@jahewson.com: On 26 Jul 2015, at 13:11, Maruan Sahyoun sahy...@fileaffairs.de wrote: Hi, Am 26.07.2015 um 22:00 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler andr...@lehmi.de: Hi, I like all those new features which were added to PDFDebugger lately

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 1.8.10

+1 BR Maruan Am 18.07.2015 um 18:16 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler andr...@lehmi.de: Hi, a candidate for the PDFBox 1.8.10 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/1.8.10/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:

[DISCUSS] Inconsistencies between annotation and form package

Hi, there are some inconsistencies between the annotation package and the form package how static final fields are handled. The classes in the annotation package have these public. The classes in the form package have these private or package private. I'd propose to make them public in the

Re: [DISCUSS] Inconsistencies between annotation and form package

Am 13.07.2015 um 08:55 schrieb John Hewson j...@jahewson.com: On 12 Jul 2015, at 22:50, Maruan Sahyoun sahy...@fileaffairs.de wrote: Am 13.07.2015 um 03:18 schrieb John Hewson j...@jahewson.com: On 12 Jul 2015, at 15:17, Maruan Sahyoun sahy...@fileaffairs.de wrote: Hi

Re: [DISCUSS] Inconsistencies between annotation and form package

Am 13.07.2015 um 09:42 schrieb John Hewson j...@jahewson.com: On 13 Jul 2015, at 00:27, Maruan Sahyoun sahy...@fileaffairs.de wrote: Am 13.07.2015 um 08:55 schrieb John Hewson j...@jahewson.com: On 12 Jul 2015, at 22:50, Maruan Sahyoun sahy...@fileaffairs.de wrote: Am

Re: comparison of 1.8.10 and 2.0 trunk

Hi Tim, I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-3058 to track our part of fixing issues as part of the test (and later onset come) and added you and Tilman as a watcher. BR Maruan > Am 23.10.2015 um 21:36 schrieb Allison,

Re: PDFBox Website [PDFBOX-3040]

> Am 29.10.2015 um 20:20 schrieb John Hewson <j...@jahewson.com>: > > >> On 29 Oct 2015, at 12:00, Maruan Sahyoun <sahy...@fileaffairs.de> wrote: >> >>> >>> Am 29.10.2015 um 19:44 schrieb John Hewson <j...@jahewson.com >>> <m

Re: PDFBox Website [PDFBOX-3040]

> Am 29.10.2015 um 19:44 schrieb John Hewson <j...@jahewson.com>: > > >> On 29 Oct 2015, at 02:47, Maruan Sahyoun <sahy...@fileaffairs.de> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I've done all the changes to be able to build locally using jekyll. Shall we

PDFBox Website [PDFBOX-3040]

Hi, I've done all the changes to be able to build locally using jekyll. Shall we merge the branch jekyll-migration back to trunk or what are the proposed next steps? We could also use the jekyll-migration branch as a base for pdfbox-docs (git), build from there and after that remove the

Re: [DISCUSS] Enhance AcroForms functionality

> Am 10.11.2015 um 19:19 schrieb John Hewson <j...@jahewson.com>: > > Correction: That’s how *PDFBox* is designed. > >> On 10 Nov 2015, at 10:15, John Hewson <j...@jahewson.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 10 Nov 2015, at 03:30, Maru

Re: [DISCUSS] Enhance AcroForms functionality

> Am 10.11.2015 um 22:16 schrieb John Hewson <j...@jahewson.com>: > > >> On 10 Nov 2015, at 12:10, Maruan Sahyoun <sahy...@fileaffairs.de> wrote: >> >>> >>> Am 10.11.2015 um 19:19 schrieb John Hewson <j...@jahewson.com>: >>>

[DISCUSS] Enhance AcroForms functionality

Hi, as discussed on http://stackoverflow.com/questions/33383389/pdfbox-how-can-a-pdacroform-be-flattened/33489651#33489651 now we have a flatten() method there is also the need to (re-) generate the appearances on demand. The same applies if we'd like to flatten annotations. With the current

Re: Pdfbox trunk performance

while") BR Maruan > > BR, Manfred > > Am 02.11.2015 um 17:12 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: >> Hello Manfred, >> >>> Am 02.11.2015 um 17:09 schrieb Manfred Pock <pock.manf...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> Hello! >>> >>&

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

> Am 02.11.2015 um 18:36 schrieb Tilman Hausherr : > > Am 02.11.2015 um 12:29 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: >> Hi, >> >> do we need another release candidate before releasing the final version? >> >> I would have some cycles to cut a RC2 this week only (on Wednesday?). >>

Re: PDFBox Website [PDFBOX-3040]

> Am 29.10.2015 um 20:27 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun <sahy...@fileaffairs.de>: > > >> Am 29.10.2015 um 20:20 schrieb John Hewson <j...@jahewson.com>: >> >> >>> On 29 Oct 2015, at 12:00, Maruan Sahyoun <sahy...@fileaffairs.de> wrote: >>

Re: Pdfbox trunk performance

> Am 07.11.2015 um 04:52 schrieb Tilman Hausherr : > > We take 12-18 seconds to display the first page. > > I**PDF takes 2 seconds to display the first page. mhmm - looks like we should do some profiling if the results are the same. BR Maruan > > Tilman > > Am

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

Hi, > Am 02.11.2015 um 12:29 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler : > > Hi, > > do we need another release candidate before releasing the final version? > I'd think another RC would be good but that should potentially include an enhanced font cache. BR Maruan > I would have some

Re: Pdfbox trunk performance

Hello Manfred, > Am 02.11.2015 um 17:09 schrieb Manfred Pock : > > Hello! > > Currently we you use a version from pdfbox to render pdf's from the trunk at > date 2015-03-09. Not really fast, but it will be ok. > > From time to time i try the current trunk version to

Re: Pdfbox trunk performance

Log-message, no there are no new log message. btw - how do you do the rendering? Would you have a code snippet? BR Maruan > > BR, Manfred > > Am 02.11.2015 um 17:12 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: >> Hello Manfred, >> >>> Am 02.11.2015 um 17:09 schrieb Manfred Pock &

Convert README.txt to README.md and markdown

Hi, I would like to take the current README.txt in the projects top level folder, rename that to README.md and use markdown for formatting. In addition I would like to add some more content as a kind of quick start how to get help, file issues… Benefit would be that a) the README provides some

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

> Am 06.11.2015 um 07:30 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > > Am 02.11.2015 um 12:29 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: >> Hi, >> >> do we need another release candidate before releasing the final version? >> >> I would have some cycles to cut a RC2 this week only (on

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

> Am 06.11.2015 um 10:20 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler <andr...@lehmi.de>: > >> Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> hat am 6. November 2015 um 09:36 >> geschrieben: >> >> >> Am 06.11.2015 um 08:21 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: >>>&

[DISCUSS] PDFBOX-3094 How to treat common fields when merging forms

Hi, when merging forms we are currently treating common fields like different ones i.e. we rename the fields of the merged documents so they have unique names. Adobe handles that differently where names common between documents are treated as the same field (with the value of the first

Re: [DISCUSS] PDFBOX-3094 How to treat common fields when merging forms

> Am 06.11.2015 um 18:40 schrieb Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de>: > > Am 06.11.2015 um 18:37 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: >> Hi, >> >> when merging forms we are currently treating common fields like different >> ones i.e. we rename the fields of t

Re: PDFBox Website [PDFBOX-3040]

> Am 30.10.2015 um 20:06 schrieb John Hewson <j...@jahewson.com>: > > >> On 30 Oct 2015, at 11:58, Maruan Sahyoun <sahy...@fileaffairs.de> wrote: >> >> Hi, >>> Am 30.10.2015 um 19:39 schrieb John Hewson <j...@jahewson.com>: >>

Re: PDFBox Website [PDFBOX-3040]

Hi, > Am 30.10.2015 um 19:39 schrieb John Hewson <j...@jahewson.com>: > > >> On 30 Oct 2015, at 03:33, Maruan Sahyoun <sahy...@fileaffairs.de> wrote: >> >>> >>> Am 29.10.2015 um 20:27 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun <sahy...@fileaffairs.de>: >

News/Blog on PDFBox website

Hi, I would like to start a news/blog section on the PDFBox website so we can give regular updates more quickly. As that is not so easily done using the Apache CMS I'd like to discuss moving to a local build of the website publishing to the Apache CMS the same way we are doing it now for the

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

I've added an initial migration guide which can be reviewed at http://pdfbox.staging.apache.org/2.0/migration.html Changes etc at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-3030 BR

Re: News/Blog on PDFBox website

Hi, > Am 20.10.2015 um 11:45 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler <andr...@lehmi.de>: > > Hi, > >> Maruan Sahyoun <sahy...@fileaffairs.de> hat am 19. Oktober 2015 um 10:52 >> geschrieben: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> I would like to start a new

Re: News/Blog on PDFBox website

Hi, > Am 20.10.2015 um 16:20 schrieb John Hewson <j...@jahewson.com>: > > > >> On 19 Oct 2015, at 01:52, Maruan Sahyoun <sahy...@fileaffairs.de> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I would like to start a news/blog section on the PDFBox w

Re: News/Blog on PDFBox website

Hi, > Am 20.10.2015 um 16:55 schrieb John Hewson <j...@jahewson.com>: > > >> On 20 Oct 2015, at 07:31, Maruan Sahyoun <sahy...@fileaffairs.de> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >>> Am 20.10.2015 um 16:20 schrieb John Hewson <j...@jahewson.com>:

Re: ttc collections as map

Hi, > Am 18.10.2015 um 15:33 schrieb Tilman Hausherr : > > Should we offer some sort of map of name -> ttf-font? Currently a user needs > to go through a list of fonts > > trueTypeCollection.getFonts() > > until hitting the correct one. Shouldn't we have something like

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Hi, > Am 14.10.2015 um 19:09 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > > Am 09.10.2015 um 12:51 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: >> Hi, >> >> in a quick discussion on private@pdfbox we agreed to cut a new release next >> week >> on october 15th. There are some questions which

[DISCUSS] Create XFA in other package

Hi, I'd like to create XFA handling in a different package to be able to extend it further (which may or may not happen) without cluttering the interactive.forms package. Reasons from my perspective - there were a number of questions around xfa lately - we do not currently support filling out

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Hi, > Am 12.10.2015 um 12:32 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler <andr...@lehmi.de>: > > Hi, > >> Maruan Sahyoun <sahy...@fileaffairs.de> hat am 9. Oktober 2015 um 13:01 >> geschrieben: >> >> >> Hi, >> > > SNIP > >>> D

PDFBox 1.2.1 Javadon

Hi, we still have the old 1.2.1 javadoc available - can we delete it? BR Maruan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org

Re: Apache PDFBox October 2015 board report due

Hi, > Am 06.10.2015 um 08:07 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler <andr...@lehmi.de>: > > Am 05.10.2015 um 23:02 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: >> Hi, >> >> + 1 >> >> One thing we might want to address is the large numbers of eMail to dev >> because of the co

Re: Apache PDFBox October 2015 board report due

Hi, + 1 One thing we might want to address is the large numbers of eMail to dev because of the commit etc. stuff. Maruan > Am 05.10.2015 um 19:47 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > find attached a quick draft of the board report we're expected to submit this >

Re: PDFBox 2.0.0 release

Hi, > Am 09.10.2015 um 12:51 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler : > > Hi, > > in a quick discussion on private@pdfbox we agreed to cut a new release next > week > on october 15th. There are some questions which should be answered before: > > - Are we still in the same boat? Are

Re: calling protect() after setAllSecurityToBeRemoved(true)

Hi Am 11.07.2015 um 19:44 schrieb Tilman Hausherr thaush...@t-online.de: Yesterday user Roberto had a problem where a file wasn't saved with encryption. The cause turned out to be that he had called setAllSecurityToBeRemoved(true) and then protect(...) I didn't find it by

Re: [DISCUSS] Inconsistencies between annotation and form package

Am 13.07.2015 um 03:18 schrieb John Hewson j...@jahewson.com: On 12 Jul 2015, at 15:17, Maruan Sahyoun sahy...@fileaffairs.de wrote: Hi, there are some inconsistencies between the annotation package and the form package how static final fields are handled. The classes

Re: ClassCastException during rendering pdf

Hi Manfred, how was that document created. Has it been processed afterwards? The reason for the issue - if I'm not mistaken is that the document contains a FileAttachment annotation but that is contained in the /Contents of the page where there should either be a single stream or an array of

Re: New releases?

Hi, > Am 03.01.2016 um 15:37 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > how about cutting a new RC for 2.0? > is there a reason to not cut the final 2.0? > IMHO we should release a new 1.8 version as well. WDYT? > +1 > > BR > Andreas > > P.S.: Happy new year and best

Re: Signature dictionaries encrypted or not

From ISO32000-2: Encryption applies to all strings and streams in the document's PDF file, with the following exceptions: The values for the ID entry in the trailer Any strings in an Encrypt dictionary Any strings that are inside streams such as content streams and compressed object

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2

+1 - thanks for preparing the RC2. BR Maruan > Am 18.11.2015 um 19:46 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.0-RC2 release is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.0-RC2/ > > The release candidate is a zip

Re: [2/2] pdfbox-docs git commit: Site checkin for project Apache PDFBox Website

> Am 22.11.2015 um 11:32 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler <andr...@lehmi.de>: > > Am 22.11.2015 um 11:27 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: >> Hi Andreas, >> >>> Am 21.11.2015 um 21:18 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler <andr...@lehmi.de>: >>> >>> Hi, >

Re: [2/2] pdfbox-docs git commit: Site checkin for project Apache PDFBox Website

Hi Andreas, > Am 21.11.2015 um 21:18 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > I've updated the download.html file only. Where did all those changes come > from? Did I do something wrong? > which version of jekyll did you use? From the changes that is very likely because

Re: 2.0.0-RC2

Hi, > Am 17.11.2015 um 12:54 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler : > > Hi, > >> Andreas Lehmkuehler hat am 9. November 2015 um 18:36 >> geschrieben: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> Am 07.11.2015 um 14:38 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: >>> On 11/06/2015 10:24 PM, Andreas

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.0-RC3

+1 - thanks for the preparation. Maruan > Am 11.01.2016 um 20:18 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.0-RC3 release is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.0-RC3/ > > The release candidate is a zip

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 1.8.11

+1 - thanks for the preparation. Maruan > Am 11.01.2016 um 20:39 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > a candidate for the PDFBox 1.8.11 release is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/1.8.11/ > > The release candidate is a zip archive of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.2

+1 > Am 06.06.2016 um 19:25 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.2 release is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.2/ > > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: > >

Re: [CVE-2016-2175] Apache PDFBox XML External Entity vulnerability

Hi, > Am 07.06.2016 um 11:42 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler <andr...@lehmi.de>: > > Hi, > >> Maruan Sahyoun <sahy...@fileaffairs.de> hat am 6. Juni 2016 um 12:40 >> geschrieben: >> >> >> Hi, >> >>> Am 06.06.2016 um

Re: [CVE-2016-2175] Apache PDFBox XML External Entity vulnerability

Hi, > Am 06.06.2016 um 11:41 schrieb Simon Steiner : > > Hi, > > Should this be on the pdfbox homepage. I'll let Andreas decide on that > The homepage has http://pdfbox.apache.org/download.cgi but its not clickable. done - thanks for letting us know. Maruan > >

Re: PDFBox JavaDoc and Subprojects

> Am 07.06.2016 um 11:44 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler <andr...@lehmi.de>: > >> Maruan Sahyoun <sahy...@fileaffairs.de> hat am 29. Mai 2016 um 18:35 >> geschrieben: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> in order to publish the API docs for pdfbox and

Re: PDDocument.importPage

Hi, > Am 12.06.2016 um 12:27 schrieb Tilman Hausherr : > > rev 1741295 in PDFBOX-3280 (deep clone) was a bad decision related to > splitting, or related to creating new documents from existing documents. What > should be done now? > > my thought: > > 1) revert the

Re: Weird content stream in ImageToPDF

Hi, > Am 30.05.2016 um 21:41 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun <sahy...@fileaffairs.de>: > > thanks - will fix it tomorrow morning when I'm back. > > BR > Maruan > >> Am 30.05.2016 um 20:59 schrieb Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de>: >> >> I t

Re: remove obsolte IOException declarations

Hi, > Am 26.05.2016 um 17:45 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler <andr...@lehmi.de>: > > Hi, > > Am 26.05.2016 um 17:21 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: >> Hi, >> >> from time to time I come across a method signature with … throws IOException >&g

remove obsolte IOException declarations

Hi, from time to time I come across a method signature with … throws IOException where the code will not throw an exception and as such the declaration is nt neccessary. Can we remove such declarations in minor releases (e.g. 2.1) or does that need a major release (e.g. 3.0). BR Maruan

Re: remove obsolte IOException declarations

> Am 26.05.2016 um 19:50 schrieb Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de>: > > Am 26.05.2016 um 19:45 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: >>> Am 26.05.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler <andr...@lehmi.de>: >>> >>> Am 26.05.2016 um 17:51 schrieb Maruan S

Re: svn commit: r1745651 - /pdfbox/trunk/pdfbox/src/main/java/org/apache/pdfbox/pdmodel/interactive/annotation/handlers/PDPolygonAppearanceHandler.java

Hi, Maruan Sahyoun > Am 27.05.2016 um 16:55 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler <andr...@lehmi.de>: > > Hi, > > looks like something is mixed up, PDFBOX-3364 is already resolved and the > commit doesn't seem to fit in, or do I miss something? The same for r1745641 these sh

Re: Weird content stream in ImageToPDF

thanks - will fix it tomorrow morning when I'm back. BR Maruan > Am 30.05.2016 um 20:59 schrieb Tilman Hausherr : > > I think I got it. The problem is the grouping of large numbers, i.e. 1234 > must not appear in "US style" as 1,234 so setGrouping is set to false. > >

PDFBox JavaDoc and Subprojects

Hi, in order to publish the API docs for pdfbox and it's subproject I see two options a) one combined JavaDoc for PDFBox and all subproject b) single JavaDoc for PDFBox and for each of it's subprojects a) is easier to generate b) would allow us to handle them individually as part of per

Re: Arabic Text Not Print Properly

Hi, > Am 24.06.2016 um 13:00 schrieb Nadeem Mohammed : > > Hi > > I have create a report in Arabic but it will not show in a proper format. > Text shown in a left to right. with no join between them. > I want to print نديم > but it will show as م ي د ن > how did

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 1.8.11

Hi, I'd cancel the vote and redo the release. BR Maruan > Am 13.01.2016 um 18:23 schrieb Tilman Hausherr : > > Please see this > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-3193 > > > > > - > To

Re: Final 2.0.0 release

+1 > Am 28.02.2016 um 17:36 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > IMHO we are ready for the final 2.0.0 release. Tilman already asked for a > possible release date in another thread. > > I'm planing to cut the release in 2 weeks from now, on 14th of March. > > WDYT? >

Re: widgets connection to parents

The spec has this (in PDF 2.0) (Required if this widget annotation is one of multiple children in a field; optional otherwise) An indirect reference to the widget annotation’s parent field. A widget annotation may have at most one parent; that is, it can be included in the Kids array of at

Re: widgets connection to parents

-) OTOH adding annotations and fields should be made much simpler which I'm looking to do after 2.0 BR Maruan > for (PDAnnotationWidget widget : children) > { >widget.getCOSObject().setItem(COSName.PARENT, this); > } > > > Tilman > > Am 21.01.2016 um 16:45 sc

Re: GSoC 2016

well - we could need some help in improving the annotation support (construction, appearance generation ..) - I'm not a skilled enough programmer to mentor someone though > Am 15.03.2016 um 21:18 schrieb Tilman Hausherr : > > I don't have a good project idea for GSoC

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.0

+1 - thanks for doing the preparation work. BR Maruan > Am 14.03.2016 um 18:35 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.0 release is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.0/ > > The release candidate is a zip

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.0

Hi, > Am 14.03.2016 um 21:52 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > Am 14.03.2016 um 19:02 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: >> Am 14.03.2016 um 18:35 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: >>> Hi, >>> >>> a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.0 release is available at: >>> >>>

Re: Apache PDFBox April 2016 board report due

Hi, > Am 10.04.2016 um 16:32 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > find attached a quick draft of the board report we're expected to submit this > month. It's based upon the report template which can be found at [1] > > > Any further comments, objections or additions?

PDFBOX 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT Javadoc updated

FYI I've updated the javadoc for PDFBOX 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT yesterday - for some reason it didn't show up in the issues although the commit message included PDFBOX-3030. BR - Maruan - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Custom glyphlist for text extraction

Hi, I was wondering if we lost the capability to supply a custom glyph list file as discussed here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/35972788/how-to-read-control-characters-in-a-pdf-using-java/36034529#36034529 PDFTextStreamEngine seems to have it hardcoded

PDFBox 2.1

Hi, now as PDFBox 2.0 is out what about collecting ideas for 2.1? Could put that on our website the same way we had the old ideas published. From my perspective: - simplify creation of AcroForm fields - appearance generation for new AcroForm fields - rework/enhancement to the plain text

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 1.8.12

+1 thanks for again handling the process. BR Maruan > Am 22.04.2016 um 18:50 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > a candidate for the PDFBox 1.8.12 release is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/1.8.12/ > > The release candidate is a zip

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.1

+1 Maruan > Am 22.04.2016 um 19:15 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.1 release is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.1/ > > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: > >

PDFBox and word forming for certain languages

Hi, longer term I'd like to support word forming for languages such as Arabic for form filling and annotations. For that I'd like to understand if we already have access to the GSUB table in OpenType fonts and discuss where the forming would best fit - font.encode() - showText() - specific

Re: fdf import with PDRadioCollection

Hi, > Am 04.05.2016 um 15:55 schrieb Morgan GRIGNARD : > > > Hi, > I encountered an error when i try to export an fdf in a pdf containing > PDRadioCollection. (1.8.12 version) > > The first export is correct > > > *4* > > > But after an fdf import, a direct pdf

Re: PDFBox 1.8.10

Hi, > Am 29.07.2016 um 16:32 schrieb Philip P. Nielsen : > > Hello, > > I totally love the simple cmd tools your team provides. I have one issue > when splitting PDFs... Is it possible to rename the output file instead of > it adding -0 to the end when using cmd? you can use

Re: Apache PDFBox July 2016 board report due

Hi, > Am 12.07.2016 um 13:07 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > find attached a quick draft of the board report we're expected to submit this > month. It's based upon the report template which can be found at [1] > > > Any further comments, objections or additions? >

Re: Performance improvement contributions

Dear Michael, > Am 12.07.2016 um 17:48 schrieb Doswald Michael : > >> Von: Tilman Hausherr >> Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Juli 2016 17:23 >> >> >> Additional to Andreas' answer: >> - to avoid frustration, start with something simple, i.e. that

Re: Enforce https for PDFBox site

Hi, permanent redirect using .htaccess. If there are gotchas please let me know or add to PDFBOX-3330. Thanks > Am 20.02.2017 um 10:33 schrieb Simon Steiner <simonsteiner1...@gmail.com>: > > Hi, > > How did you enabled it? > > Thanks > > -----Original Me

Re: Enforce https for PDFBox site

done > Am 19.02.2017 um 00:18 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler <andr...@lehmi.de>: > > Am 18.02.2017 um 21:15 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: >> with the general move towards https I've changed where possible the links >> for our site accordingly. >> >> We could enf

Enforce https for PDFBox site

with the general move towards https I've changed where possible the links for our site accordingly. We could enforce https when the site is visited via http - thoughts? BR Maruan - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: PDFBox 2.0.3?

Hi, > Am 11.09.2016 um 14:57 schrieb Tilman Hausherr : > >> Am 07.09.2016 um 14:10 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: >> Hi, >> >> I'm back and able to spare some time on PDFBox again starting next week. >> >> Saying that, it's time for a new 2.0.x release as promised ;-) >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.3

+1 Maruan Sahyoun > Am 14.09.2016 um 11:04 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler <andr...@lehmi.de>: > > Hi, > > a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.3 release is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.3/ > > The release candidat

Re: pdfbox-docs git commit: PDFBOX-3330: add release info for PDFBox 2.0.3

che.org/repos/asf/pdfbox-docs/tree/f0f06d68 >> Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/pdfbox-docs/diff/f0f06d68 >> >> Branch: refs/heads/master >> Commit: f0f06d6848a96b1ee5f4dd1154eeb77a8072a4aa >> Parents: b637ba4 >> Author: Maruan Sahyoun <sahy...@fi

Re: [JENKINS] - More build NODES ; Less build LABELS

Hi, > Am 12.11.2016 um 15:01 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > infra consolidated jenkins nodes and labels. The most interesting part is the > comment of the reserved nodes H19 Sounds like we should be able to > create a job to build our website using jenkins. > we

Re: [JENKINS] - More build NODES ; Less build LABELS

Hi, > Am 14.11.2016 um 12:23 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler <andr...@lehmi.de>: > > >> Maruan Sahyoun <sahy...@fileaffairs.de> hat am 12. November 2016 um 16:09 >> geschrieben: >> >> >> Hi, >> >>> Am 12.11.2016 um 15:01 schrieb A

Contribution Information

Hi, inspired by a recent post on the Apache Camel mailing list and https://github.com/apache/spark WDYT about us adding a CONTRIBUTING.md file to our repositiory to inform GitHub users when doing pull requests as can bee seen here.

Re: New releases

+1 > Am 28.11.2016 um 21:38 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Am 24.11.2016 um 14:43 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: >> Hi, >> >> I'm planing to cut new releases for 1.8.x and 2.0.x in about 2-3 weeks from >> now. > > I'm going to cut the releases as follows: > > - 1.8.13 on

[discuss] "No glyph for U+... in font ...."

Hi, a very common issue on the mailing list as well as SO is the IllegalArgumentException people get if one tries to use a character with a font which has no support for that. Could we lower the requirement here to instead of throwing a exception use a replacement char and log a warning? Other

Re: [discuss] "No glyph for U+... in font ...."

> Am 03.11.2016 um 17:33 schrieb John Hewson <j...@jahewson.com>: > > >> On 3 Nov 2016, at 02:11, Maruan Sahyoun <sahy...@fileaffairs.de> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> a very common issue on the mailing list as well as SO is the >> IllegalArg

Re: [discuss] "No glyph for U+... in font ...."

> Am 03.11.2016 um 21:09 schrieb John Hewson <j...@jahewson.com>: > >> >> On 3 Nov 2016, at 12:16, Maruan Sahyoun <sahy...@fileaffairs.de> wrote: >> >>> >>> Am 03.11.2016 um 17:33 schrieb John Hewson <j...@jahewson.com>:

Re: Apache PDFBox October2016 board report due

+1 Maruan > Am 10.10.2016 um 17:31 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > find attached a quick draft of the board report we're expected to submit this > month. It's based upon the report template which can be found at [1] > > > Any further comments, objections or

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.4

+1 Maruan > Am 12.12.2016 um 18:52 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.4 release is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.4/ > > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 1.8.13

+1 BR Maruan > Am 05.12.2016 um 21:03 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > a candidate for the PDFBox 1.8.13 release is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/1.8.13/ > > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: > >

Re: Apache PDFBox January 2017 board report due

Hi, +1 Maruan > Am 09.01.2017 um 19:45 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler : > > Hi, > > find attached a quick draft of the board report we're expected to submit this > month. It's based upon the report template which can be found at [1] > > > Any further comments, objections or

Re: Branch for new major version?

> Am 21.03.2017 um 19:17 schrieb Tilman Hausherr : > > Am 21.03.2017 um 17:53 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: >> Hi, >> >> I'm thinking about implementing some stuff which would most likely require a >> new major version. Obviously there are some similar things which

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >