Hello again,
This message acknowledges receipt of your ICLA, which has been filed in
the Apache Software Foundation records.
If you have been invited as a committer, please advise the project PMC that
your ICLA has been filed.
Vakhtang
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Tilman Hausherr
Great, I will take a look at your patches today.
Thanks!
-- John
On 12 Mar 2014, at 07:10, Vakhtang koroghlishvili
vakhtang.koroghlishv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello again,
This message acknowledges receipt of your ICLA, which has been filed in
the Apache Software Foundation records.
Hi Vakhtang,
I think, it's time to create another project named sign-box or something like
that.
Should the classes in
org.apache.pdfbox.pdmodel.interactive.digitalsignature.visible be moved into
this new project also?
My understanding is that the PDF spec defines a basic signature
Hello Vakhtang,
I remember you from some time ago without details, and that one of the
committers was very satisfied with your code. Maybe that person will
come back later, the weekend seems to be very quiet here.
I'm answering you that you don't get frustrated. A few thoughts:
- did
Should the classes in org.apache.pdfbox.pdmodel.
interactive.digitalsignature.visible be moved into this new project also
Because of this classes is for creating visible signature fields (not for
signing) we can not to move that classes. sign-box will be for only signing.
is this already in
Hello,
I remember you from some time ago without details, and that one of the
committers was very satisfied with your code.
Yes, might be it was Thomas Chojecki. The architecture of the new features
was written using very beautiful design patterns and it was working very
well :)
did Andreas
Ok. If these classes are not for signing then why are they in the
digitalsignature package? Should they be moved elsewhere?
This classes is essential for signature but this classes does not signs
document (cryptography signing is creating in the example-project).
The same is for about
Am 2014-03-10 10:13, schrieb Vakhtang koroghlishvili:
Hello,
Hi Vakhtang,
i'm quite busy right now at work and planing my vacation. But at least I
got my internet back this month *wohoo*.
My codes have a CLA license, Tomas Chojecki have added it. At the
moment
some of them are committed
Vakhtang
Ok. If these classes are not for signing then why are they in the
digitalsignature package? Should they be moved elsewhere?
This classes is essential for signature but this classes does not signs
document (cryptography signing is creating in the example-project”)
Ok, so the
Hi,
Ok, I will do license things too. :) thanks for explanations :)
And who will create new sub project? Should I create this or will you
create this when you have spear time? :)
I'm not committer, I can only create patches and show you the result. :)
Vakhtang,
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:19
And who will create new sub project? Should I create this or will you
create this when you have spear time? :)
I'm not committer, I can only create patches and show you the result. :)
I’m happy do do this for you.
-- John
Hello,
how are you? :)
You know , that I have already fix and implement some issues and new
features which was about digital signature. I have already created another
new features too but I don't know if I should create this patches in the
pdfbox example project. I think, it's time to create
12 matches
Mail list logo
