On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
> > Test fails for me. I'll try and debug a bit more.
>
> hmph, with the mod_perl.c patch?
>
> does it fail for anyone else? I just rebuilt the 1.27 release candidate with 5.6.1
>and it
> passed just fine.
>
> I rememebered that I forgot to include m
> Test fails for me. I'll try and debug a bit more.
hmph, with the mod_perl.c patch?
does it fail for anyone else? I just rebuilt the 1.27 release candidate with 5.6.1
and it
passed just fine.
I rememebered that I forgot to include my build arguments in my last report, so maybe
that
will he
At Tue, 26 Mar 2002 06:56:48 -0800 (PST),
Doug MacEachern wrote:
> > > It seems to me that Apache::Util::parsedate() ignores '-0700'.
>
> hmm, strange the tests passed for me. but your patch looks good, thanks.
The test only checks the date is same. What makes the difference is
our timezones.
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Tatsuhiko Miyagawa wrote:
> At Tue, 26 Mar 2002 15:03:44 +0900,
> Tatsuhiko Miyagawa wrote:
>
> > It seems to me that Apache::Util::parsedate() ignores '-0700'.
hmm, strange the tests passed for me. but your patch looks good, thanks.
---
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> hi all...
>
> well, I thought I'd try to help give the 1.3 tree some forward momentum...
>
> my thought is to run through the STATUS file and present all the available patches
>for
> review and incorporation into core, and I thought I'd start with
>>> This function will correctly escape US-ASCII output. If you're using
>>> a different character set such as UTF8, or need more control on
>>> the escaping process, use HTML::Entities.
>>
> I like it too for the simple reason that it seems simple and doesn't
> worry the casual user, or confuse h
Robin Berjon wrote:
>On Tuesday 26 March 2002 15:31, Eric Cholet wrote:
>
>>--On Monday, March 25, 2002 11:04:02 -0800 Doug MacEachern
>>
>>>what we've done with escape_html already (diverging from apache) is just
>>>plain wrong. i don't want to take it any further. this should be
>>>implemente
On Tuesday 26 March 2002 15:31, Eric Cholet wrote:
> --On Monday, March 25, 2002 11:04:02 -0800 Doug MacEachern
> > what we've done with escape_html already (diverging from apache) is just
> > plain wrong. i don't want to take it any further. this should be
> > implemented properly for 2.0 (in a
--On Monday, March 25, 2002 11:04:02 -0800 Doug MacEachern
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what we've done with escape_html already (diverging from apache) is just
> plain wrong. i don't want to take it any further. this should be
> implemented properly for 2.0 (in apache) and/or HTML::Entities
