Thanks for taking the time to lay out this solid argument Torsten. I
wasn't able to duplicate the issue either.
I've resolved https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=32992 by not
applying the suggested patch. I think the submitter may have had an
odd setup, but there wasn't enough evidence to
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Philip M. Gollucci
wrote:
> On 04/16/10 19:11, Fred Moyer wrote:
>>
>> Does anyone have 5.6.x to test with?
>>
>> I know of a couple shops using 5.6, but they monkey patched it, and
>> will probably never upgrade.
>
> with mp2 ? wow.
mp1.
>> I see 5.8 being wide
On 04/16/10 19:11, Fred Moyer wrote:
Does anyone have 5.6.x to test with?
I know of a couple shops using 5.6, but they monkey patched it, and
will probably never upgrade.
with mp2 ? wow.
I see 5.8 being widely used still for years to come.
yes sir.
its all moot anyway until 2.0.5 is out the
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Philip M. Gollucci
wrote:
> On 04/16/10 13:47, Vick Khera wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 15, 2010, at 10:02 PM, Fred Moyer wrote:
>>
>>> https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=32992
>>>
>>> Taking a poll again of who supports this issue resolution. Given that
>>> the pr
On 04/16/10 13:47, Vick Khera wrote:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 10:02 PM, Fred Moyer wrote:
https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=32992
Taking a poll again of who supports this issue resolution. Given that
the previous stable version of perl (5.10.1) has version.pm bundled
(current version is
On Friday 16 April 2010 04:02:17 Fred Moyer wrote:
> https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=32992
>
> Taking a poll again of who supports this issue resolution. Given that
> the previous stable version of perl (5.10.1) has version.pm bundled
> (current version is 5.12.0), I think this is safe
On Apr 15, 2010, at 10:02 PM, Fred Moyer wrote:
> https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=32992
>
> Taking a poll again of who supports this issue resolution. Given that
> the previous stable version of perl (5.10.1) has version.pm bundled
> (current version is 5.12.0), I think this is safe
https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=32992
Taking a poll again of who supports this issue resolution. Given that
the previous stable version of perl (5.10.1) has version.pm bundled
(current version is 5.12.0), I think this is safe move. 5.8.8 does
not have version.pm bundled, but it is eas
