On Monday 14 May 2007 08:35, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> >> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/dev/93415
> >
> > This one looks pretty good, and I think it's a cleaner approach
> > to the currently uncorrect one.
>
> I've just spent the evening looking at this more in details, and the
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> Torsten Foertsch wrote:
>> to have these 2 patches applied to trunk or to get a statement why they
>> cannot
>> be applied?
>
> Something very similar to what you've been doing already ;-) In general,
> that's the correct approach. Post patches, explanations, test c
Torsten Foertsch wrote:
> to have these 2 patches applied to trunk or to get a statement why they
> cannot
> be applied?
Something very similar to what you've been doing already ;-) In general,
that's the correct approach. Post patches, explanations, test cases that
expose the problem, and gener
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 10:42, Fred Moyer wrote:
> > to have these 2 patches applied to trunk or to get a statement why they
> > cannot be applied?
> >
> > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/dev/93415
> > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/dev/93466
>
> I have been following
Torsten Foertsch wrote:
to have these 2 patches applied to trunk or to get a statement why they cannot
be applied?
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/dev/93415
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/dev/93466
I have been following this somewhat, but not grokking all of it.
