In the light of sufficient interest from enough people, I've now
created and uploaded binary builds of mod_perl-2.0.7 and
libapreq2-2.13 components compatible with Apache Lounge 2.2.23 Build
24 August 2012 (win32) and each of:
* ActivePerl 5.16.0 Build 1600 (x86)
* Strawberry Perl 5.16.0 Build 1 (
I concur! We have a number of clients who use Apache + Strawberry Perl
and we would benefit from something more recent than the SP 5.12 version
of 2.04 that we currently recommend.
On 8/31/2012 5:33 AM, Michiel Beijen wrote:
Hi Steve,
Steve Hay wrote:
However, I'm unlikely to go ahead with
Hi Steve,
> Steve Hay wrote:
>
> However, I'm unlikely to go ahead with this now anyway since there
> seems to be little need for it. That's good news, really, since it
> indicates that building mod_perl is not a difficult thing anyway :-)
It might be you asked on the wrong mailing list; or tha
I would be *very* interested in a working mod_perl 2.0.6 or 2.0.7 for Windows
- compatible with either ActivePerl or Strawberry Perl. As far as I'm aware,
only binaries for mod_perl 2.0.4 are currently available and we're getting
consistent crashes with it that, I believe, may be fixed in later ve
On 16 May 2012 21:39, rubberboots wrote:
>
> Hello Steve,
>
>
> Steve Hay-2 wrote:
>>
>> If there is then I would be happy to do what I can to provide some. As
>> an example, I've put together two builds of Apache 2.2.22 + Perl
>> 5.14.2 + mod_perl 2.0.6 + libapreq 2.13: one with VC++ 6.0 (as per
Hello Steve,
Steve Hay-2 wrote:
>
> If there is then I would be happy to do what I can to provide some. As
> an example, I've put together two builds of Apache 2.2.22 + Perl
> 5.14.2 + mod_perl 2.0.6 + libapreq 2.13: one with VC++ 6.0 (as per
> ActivePerl) and another with VC++ 2010 (the latest
