On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> > OK, can somebody test this patch? the latest httpd source fails to get
> > parsed for me (via 'make source_scan'), so I cannot verify my patch.
>
> whats the error?
/home/stas/perl-bleed/bin/perl util/sourc
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> OK, can somebody test this patch? the latest httpd source fails to get
> parsed for me (via 'make source_scan'), so I cannot verify my patch.
whats the error?
> +(my $old = $old_content) =~ s/\w{3} \w{3} \d+ \d+:\d+:\d+ \d{4}//;
> +(my $
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> > something like that. We need to disregard: 'Sun Aug 19 10:32:24 2001'
>
> that would be fine. as i suggested eariler, feel free to change the
> format of that header which includes the date to make it easie
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> something like that. We need to disregard: 'Sun Aug 19 10:32:24 2001'
that would be fine. as i suggested eariler, feel free to change the
format of that header which includes the date to make it easier to rip
this stuff out. i'd rather see this than a
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 10:09:28AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > >
> > > > File::Compare is quite useless. We need to compare a variable against the
> > >
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 10:09:28AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >
> > > File::Compare is quite useless. We need to compare a variable against the
> > > file.
> >
> > then use 'eq', really, i just don't see a
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> > File::Compare is quite useless. We need to compare a variable against the
> > file.
>
> then use 'eq', really, i just don't see a need for checksums here.
> but File::Compare should be usable, if changes to
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> File::Compare is quite useless. We need to compare a variable against the
> file.
then use 'eq', really, i just don't see a need for checksums here.
but File::Compare should be usable, if changes to the header are made so
date is not included, so you can
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> > What's the problem with having new dependencies on CPAN? Digest::MD5 seems
> > to be a core module. Remember that everybody talks about SDKs, so we will
> > end up with dependencies anyways. If we do PRERE
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> What's the problem with having new dependencies on CPAN? Digest::MD5 seems
> to be a core module. Remember that everybody talks about SDKs, so we will
> end up with dependencies anyways. If we do PREREQ_PM, CPAN will
> automatically install all the requi
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> > it's still not working perfectly, since it has to fish $dump out of the
> > file, and I see that it doesn't work for all current files.
>
> you could change the warning header to include:
> # __END_OF_HEAD
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> it's still not working perfectly, since it has to fish $dump out of the
> file, and I see that it doesn't work for all current files.
you could change the warning header to include:
# __END_OF_HEADER__
or something to make it easier to parse/compare.
an
> > also are you sure that we need to have this kind of diffs?
> >
> > # !!
> > # ! WARNING: generated by Apache::ParseSource/0.02
> > -# ! Sun Aug 19 10:32:09 2001
> > +# ! Sun Aug 26 01:23:32 2001
> > # ! do NOT edit,
On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> With a small problem, 'make source_scan' works for me!!!
>
> I've attached the whole thing (and not inlined, since you can generate it
> yourself :)!
>
> I wanted to ask why on my side I seemingly get a better scanning. If you
> look at the snippet belo
14 matches
Mail list logo