The URL
http://perl.apache.org/dist/mod_perl-2.0.2.tar.gz
has entered CPAN as
file: $CPAN/authors/id/P/PG/PGOLLUCCI/mod_perl-2.0.2.tar.gz
size: 3692744 bytes
md5: ad0a509fd34e3b8452887d80a1d45dea
No action is required on your part
Request entered by: PGOLLUCCI (Philip M. Gollucci
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> A release candidate for mod_perl 2.0.2 is now available for testing.
>
> Please grab the candidate from
>
> http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/mp2/mod_perl-2.0.2-RC2.tar.gz
looks good
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
A release candidate for mod_perl 2.0.2 is now available for testing.
Please grab the candidate from
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/mp2/mod_perl-2.0.2-RC2.tar.gz
+1
FreeBSD 7.0-current
perl 5.8.7 w/o ithreads
httpd 2.0.55 apr not threaded
Well, I've got
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
A release candidate for mod_perl 2.0.2 is now available for testing.
All tests OK now on WinXP/VC6 with perl-5.8.7 and apache-2.0.54.
(And I still have the Apache 1 installed in C:\apache which broke things
for me when testing RC1
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Jie Gao wrote:
> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:21:13 +1000 (EST)
> From: Jie Gao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: mod_perl Dev ,
> mod_perl list
> Subject: Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] mod_perl-2.0.2 RC1 All tests successful
> on solaris 9 sp
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
A release candidate for mod_perl 2.0.2 is now available for testing.
Please grab the candidate from
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/mp2/mod_perl-2.0.2-RC2.tar.gz
and report back successes or failures.
Builds and tests fine on
- linux: perl
Hi All,
perl-5.8.3_threaded + apache_2.0.49 on SunOS 5.9 Generic_118558-11 sun4u sparc
SUNW,Ultra-5_10:
All tests successful.
Regards,
Jie
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
All tests pass on Ubuntu 5.04 with a self built 2.0.54 prefork, Perl 5.8.4.
Thanks!
We should note the Ubuntu httpd mess on the website ?
--
END
What doesn't kill us can only make us stronger.
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> A release candidate for mod_perl 2.0.2 is now available for testing.
>
> Please grab the candidate from
>
> http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/mp2/mod_perl-2.0.2-RC2.tar.gz
>
> and report back successes or failures. When reporting failures,
A release candidate for mod_perl 2.0.2 is now available for testing.
Please grab the candidate from
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/mp2/mod_perl-2.0.2-RC2.tar.gz
and report back successes or failures. When reporting failures, please see
the bug reporting guidelines at
http
sed.
>
>>
>> I'm starting to think that ubuntu is taking some major liberties with
>> it's
>> distribution, but who knows.
>
It's official. The 2.0.53 apache2 install in Ubuntu has been molested
somehow.
I downloaded 2.0.53 and 2.0.54 from apache.org, comp
Stas Bekman wrote:
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
A release candidate for mod_perl 2.0.2 is now available for testing.
Please grab the candidate from
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/mp2/mod_perl-2.0.2-dev.tar.gz
+1, tested with 43
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Christopher H. Laco wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
[ ... ]
The other test is because the executable name doesn't match.
Randy committed Steve's patch for this and this will be in RC2 and 2.0.2
release.
t/directive/perldo.t
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Christopher H. Laco wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
[ ... ]
The other test is because the executable name doesn't match.
Randy committed Steve's patch for this and this will be in RC2 and 2.0.2
release.
t/directive/perldo.t 161 6.25% 12
#
Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
> Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
>
>>Christopher H. Laco wrote:
>>
>>
>>>http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/modperl/2849479
>>
>>t/apache/content_length_header.t 273 11.11% 2 5 17
>># testing : GET /TestApache__content_length_header C-L header
>>#
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
>>
>> I thought so to, but it looks like we had test cases for 2.1 and greater,
>> and 2.0.X. the 2.1 cases were removed because > 2.1 was finally brought
>> into sync with 2.0.X.
>>
>> in other words, I don't think your change did anything.
>>
Geoffrey Young wrote:
I thought so to, but it looks like we had test cases for 2.1 and greater,
and 2.0.X. the 2.1 cases were removed because > 2.1 was finally brought
into sync with 2.0.X.
in other words, I don't think your change did anything.
on the other hand, chris is getting 2.1-type nu
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
A release candidate for mod_perl 2.0.2 is now available for testing.
Please grab the candidate from
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/mp2/mod_perl-2.0.2-dev.tar.gz
+1, tested with 43 different apaches/perls
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Christopher H. Laco wrote:
>
>> http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/modperl/2849479
>
> t/apache/content_length_header.t 273 11.11% 2 5 17
> # testing : GET /TestApache__content_length_header C-L header
> # expected: 0
> # received: unde
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Christopher H. Laco wrote:
>
>> http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/modperl/2849479
>
> t/apache/content_length_header.t 273 11.11% 2 5 17
> # testing : GET /TestApache__content_length_header C-L header
> # expected: 0
> # received: undef
>
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/modperl/2849479
t/apache/content_length_header.t 273 11.11% 2 5 17
# testing : GET /TestApache__content_length_header C-L header
# expected: 0
# received: undef
not ok 2
# testing : GET /TestApache__cont
Stas Bekman wrote:
> Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
>
>> A release candidate for mod_perl 2.0.2 is now available for testing.
>>
>> Please grab the candidate from
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/mp2/mod_perl-2.0.2-dev.tar.gz
>
>
> +1, tested wit
Geoffrey Young wrote:
I've been asked to roll an RC2 for some fixes found from Steve and Randy
pertainint to Apache-Test.
if you're going to re-roll a candidate there's an A-T fix I'd like to get in...
Go for it... I'll hold off until tonight (10pm EST) ?
--
END
> I've been asked to roll an RC2 for some fixes found from Steve and Randy
> pertainint to Apache-Test.
if you're going to re-roll a candidate there's an A-T fix I'd like to get in...
--Geoff
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PR
Stas Bekman wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
A release candidate for mod_perl 2.0.2 is now available for testing.
Please grab the candidate from
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/mp2/mod_perl-2.0.2-dev.tar.gz
+1, tested with 43 different apaches/perls configs on linux.
Yikes! Nice
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
A release candidate for mod_perl 2.0.2 is now available for testing.
Please grab the candidate from
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/mp2/mod_perl-2.0.2-dev.tar.gz
+1, tested with 43 different apaches/perls configs on linux
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 12:30 -0500, Randy Kobes wrote:
Although it's a bit of a pain, I'd suggest making up a RC2
with the fix in.
I will roll RC2 possible sunday day EST ... more likely monday night.
--
END
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 12:30 -0500, Randy Kobes wrote:
> Although it's a bit of a pain, I'd suggest making up a RC2
> with the fix in.
I think you're right. A couple more days to test that won't kill
anyone.
- Perrin
-
To unsub
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 12:57:26 -0400
Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All tests passed on Fedora Core 3, apache 2.0.54, perl 5.8.7. I give
> it +1, as soon as the fix that Randy was tracking is in.
>
> - Perrin
I also just tried it on Fedora Core 4 with Apache 2.0.54 and perl
5.8.6
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Perrin Harkins wrote:
All tests passed on Fedora Core 3, apache 2.0.54, perl 5.8.7. I give it
+1, as soon as the fix that Randy was tracking is in.
Although it's a bit of a pain, I'd suggest making up a RC2
with the fix in. As well as fixing problems like Steve had
with th
All tests passed on Fedora Core 3, apache 2.0.54, perl 5.8.7. I give it
+1, as soon as the fix that Randy was tracking is in.
- Perrin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Steve Hay wrote:
Now that I can run the tests, I find that there is one failure:
t\directive\perldo.t test 12:
# testing : $0
# expected: (?-xism:httpd)
# received: C:\apache2\bin\Apache.EXE
not ok 12
The attached (rather obvious) patch cures this, and all tests now pass
Randy Kobes wrote:
I'm working on trying to find out what causes Steve's problem in
running the tests - he specifies MP_AP_PREFIX
properly, but somehow the wrong Apache directory is picked
up. This might be a problem with Apache-Test ...
I think the problem is that a fix in the current svn fo
anges file.
That's right - the change in question is
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=293485&view=rev
which was a minor change to Geoff's
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=279383&view=rev
However, the 1st change wasn't included in the
mod_perl-2.0.2-dev.t
Randy Kobes wrote:
I think the problem is that a fix in the current svn for
Apache::TestConfigParse didn't make it into this rc. The
diff is
[...]
How is that possible, I saw Geoff commit it almost a month ago?
I believe its even in the Changes file.
--
END
---
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Randy Kobes wrote:
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Geoffrey Young wrote:
By my count, thats 2 +1s. I'll have some A-T feedback later this weekend.
just as a reminder, the ASF is really trying to enforce "three +1 from pmc
members" prior to any official release coming from ASF proj
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Geoffrey Young wrote:
By my count, thats 2 +1s. I'll have some A-T feedback later this weekend.
just as a reminder, the ASF is really trying to enforce "three +1 from pmc
members" prior to any official release coming from ASF projects, regardless
of how many +1s somethin
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 08:51 -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> here's my +1, which makes 2 pmc votes for 2.0.2. randy, perrin, joe? :)
Sorry, I've been neglecting my duties. I'll grab it and run a test
compile.
- Perrin
-
To uns
Geoffrey Young wrote:
By my count, thats 2 +1s. I'll have some A-T feedback later this weekend.
just as a reminder, the ASF is really trying to enforce "three +1 from pmc
members" prior to any official release coming from ASF projects, regardless
of how many +1s something gets from committers
> By my count, thats 2 +1s. I'll have some A-T feedback later this weekend.
just as a reminder, the ASF is really trying to enforce "three +1 from pmc
members" prior to any official release coming from ASF projects, regardless
of how many +1s something gets from committers.
here's my +1, which
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
A release candidate for mod_perl 2.0.2 is now available for testing.
Please grab the candidate from
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/mp2/mod_perl-2.0.2-dev.tar.gz
Testing on WinXP with perl-5.8.7 and apache-2.0.54 I find that it all
builds OK, but the test suite
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
A release candidate for mod_perl 2.0.2 is now available for testing.
Please grab the candidate from
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/mp2/mod_perl-2.0.2-dev.tar.gz
FreeBSD 7.0-current i386
perl 5.8.7 w/out ithread
httpd 2.0.54 apr not threaded
SMOKE test
+1
By
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> A release candidate for mod_perl 2.0.2 is now available for testing.
>
> Please grab the candidate from
>
> http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/mp2/mod_perl-2.0.2-dev.tar.gz
>
> and report back successes [...]
Apache/2.0.52/Prefork (outa fin
A release candidate for mod_perl 2.0.2 is now available for testing.
Please grab the candidate from
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/mp2/mod_perl-2.0.2-dev.tar.gz
and report back successes or failures. When reporting failures, please see
the bug reporting guidelines at
http
Stas Bekman wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Hi All,
Pending the ldd/otool patch to mp2 and A-T, I'd like to see a mp 2.0.2
released as
its been almost 4 months and we'll have 17 changes of varying degree.
I'll volunteer to RM it if I'm allowed.
Did you have a chance to run the build/tes
>>> I'll volunteer to RM it if I'm allowed.
>>
>>
>>
>> Hell, it's a nerve-wreaking task for me each time, so be my guest ;-)
>
> Don't tell me that! :)
it's not so bad, really. the RELEASE file spells out very clearly what is
required.
when the time is right, just find one (or more) of us on
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
>
>> Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Pending the ldd/otool patch to mp2 and A-T, I'd like to see a mp 2.0.2
>>> released as
>>> its been almost 4 months and we'll have 17 changes of varying degree.
>>
>> As long as it gets a
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Hi All,
Pending the ldd/otool patch to mp2 and A-T, I'd like to see a mp 2.0.2
released as
its been almost 4 months and we'll have 17 changes of varying degree.
As long as it gets a good spin of positive rc testing under various configs,
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Pending the ldd/otool patch to mp2 and A-T, I'd like to see a mp 2.0.2
> released as
> its been almost 4 months and we'll have 17 changes of varying degree.
As long as it gets a good spin of positive rc testing under various configs,
I am +1
I've got 2-3
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Do we want to include 2.1.7b as "supported" ?
At the moment we support only 2.0 officialy. This of course can be always
changed...
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH --> Just Another mod_perl Hac
Stas Bekman wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Did you have a chance to run the build/test against all supported perl
and Apache versions and several of their different builds? If so and
all tests pass, then certainly +1. If not I'll try to run the tests
tonight.
I'll run them tonight as well.
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Hi All,
Pending the ldd/otool patch to mp2 and A-T, I'd like to see a mp 2.0.2
released as
its been almost 4 months and we'll have 17 changes of varying degree.
I'll volunteer to RM it if I'm allowed.
Did you have a chance to run the build/test against all supporte
Hi All,
Pending the ldd/otool patch to mp2 and A-T, I'd like to see a mp 2.0.2 released
as
its been almost 4 months and we'll have 17 changes of varying degree.
I'll volunteer to RM it if I'm allowed.
--
END
What doesn't kill us
53 matches
Mail list logo
