Hello.
I'm porting AxKit to apache2 & mod_perl2 and got strange following
problem:
Apache2 doesn't recognise AxKit's configuration directives though
it loads the AxKit (I think so because apache2 calls AxKit per-server
creation function).
I tried to load AxKit.so by LoadModule (not LoadPerlModul
As I have mentioned earlier here:
http://mathforum.org/epigone/modperl-dev/thehplaldshend
we need to adjust to the new way apr names the libs. Here is the patch
that makes it work with the new way. Still need to handle correctly the
previous way. Should this be integrated into ModPerl::MM? I have
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Doug MacEachern wrote:
> > never intended the ModPerl:: namespace to be for third-party modules.
> > why the change from Apache:: ?
>
> The idea came from ModPerl::Registry, I thought that's why it was
> renamed from Apache::Registry in first place.
no,
of course, this apache "portable" runtime script does not work on windows.
(tho, not sure if the existing Makefile.PL did either)
strange thing is, MakeMaker should ignore libraries it cannot find, as it
has been for me. APR.pm is only meant for using apr outside of modperl,
which i don't think
note that ap[ur]-config will be required, as there may be other libs such
as -lgdbm. i've disabled the linking for the moment. i suppose if you
patch was modified to enable only if -x $apr_config && -x $apu_config,
that'd be ok. we just won't support older versions of apr or platforms
that d
Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
Doug MacEachern wrote:
never intended the ModPerl:: namespace to be for third-party modules.
why the change from Apache:: ?
The idea came from ModPerl::Registry, I thought that's why it was
renamed from Apache::Registry in firs
Doug MacEachern wrote:
note that ap[ur]-config will be required, as there may be other libs such
as -lgdbm. i've disabled the linking for the moment. i suppose if you
patch was modified to enable only if -x $apr_config && -x $apu_config,
that'd be ok. we just won't support older versions of
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Doesn't Apache2 subdir solve the problem? All other modules with the
> same name in 1.0 and 2.0 still have the same name.
sort of. but the idea was to use the 1.x Apache::Registry with 1.99_xx.
with Apache2.pm in effect, you'd get the new one, not the
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
> are we good now?
looks good to me.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ActivePerl, in their 8xx Win32 binaries based on perl-5.8, have
enabled large_file support (a USE_LARGE_FILES compile-time
flag). In compiling the cvs mod_perl-1 against this, however,
there's an error in line 1963 of Apache.xs:
statcache = r->finfo;
about '=' relating incompatible types. If I
10 matches
Mail list logo
