Thank you so much for the new release!
Jie
Please think of our environment and only print this e-mail if necessary.
* Andr? Warnier wrote:
> Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:18:33 +0100
> From: Andr? Warnier
> To: mod_perl Dev
> CC: mod_perl list
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_pe
local/apache_2.0.49/bin/./httpd -X -f
/usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.conf -k start -DSSL -X
[New LWP 1]
[New LWP 2]
[New LWP 3]
[New LWP 4]
[New LWP 5]
[New LWP 6]
[New LWP 7]
[New LWP 8]
[New LWP 9]
[New LWP 10]
[New LWP 11]
[New LWP 12]
[New LWP 13]
[LWP 2 exited]
[New LWP 2]
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to LWP 12]
0xfea9bbbc in modperl_env_request_tie (my_perl=0x1026fe0, r=0x17a8c78) at
modperl_env.c:355
355 EnvMgObj = (char *)r;
(gdb)
Regards,
Jie
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 19:23:06 -0800
> From: Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jie Gao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [mp2] bug report: modperl_env.c
>
> Jie Gao wrote:
> > ---
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 19:23:06 -0800
> From: Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jie Gao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [mp2] bug report: modperl_env.c
>
> Jie Gao wrote:
> > ---
(gdb) run -X -f /usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.conf -k start -DSSL -X
Stas wrote:
> Thanks for the trace with args, Jie, but it gives no new info.
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> [Switching to LWP 12]
> 0xfea9bbbc in modperl_env_request_tie (my_perl=0x1026f
-8<-- Start Bug Report 8<--
1. Problem Description:
Child exits with seg fault when registry script is accessed.
2. Used Components and their Configuration:
*** mod_perl version 1.9914
*** using lib/Apache/BuildConfig.pm
*** Makefile.PL options:
MP_APX
! (t/logs/error_log wasn't created, start the server
in the debug mode)
++
| Please file a bug report: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ |
+----
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 23:56:48 -0700
> From: Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jie Gao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: mod_perl Dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: time for 1.99_15?
>
> Jie Gao wrote:
> >
a core dump):
[CORE TRACE COMES HERE]
This report was generated by -e on Wed Aug 18 07:10:04 2004 GMT.
-8<-- End Bug Report --8<--
Note: Complete the rest of the details and post this bug report to
dev perl.apache.org. To subscribe to the list se
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:34:47 -0700
> From: Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jie Gao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: mod_perl Dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: time for 1.99_15?
>
> Jie Gao wrote:
>
do we know what was the error, if you didn't copy and paste the
> error? :)
After running make test a couple of times, the error message went over
the top of the screen, and I couldn't cut-and-paste. :-)
Anyway, the latest result of running make test is all clear. :-)
Cheers,
Jie
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 17:59:23 -0700
> From: Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jie Gao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: mod_perl Dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: time for 1.99_15?
>
> Jie Gao wrote:
>
Yeah, that was a very handy func. -Jie
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 22:13:27 -0400
> From: Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: mod_perl Dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [mp2 api] log_reason
>
> Over irc we have decided to
Just tried to test-build from cvs and got the following:
Reading Makefile.PL args from @ARGV
MP_DEBUG = 1
MP_USE_DSO = 1
MP_APXS = /usr/local/apache_2.0.49/bin/apxs
MP_TRACE = 1
Configuring Apache/2.0.49 mod_perl/1.99_18-dev Perl/v5.8.3
[ info] generating script t/TEST
Writing Makefi
make test fails (using Apache/2.0.51 (prefork MPM) on Solaris 9):
t/api/lookup_urirequest has failed (the response code
was: 500)
see t/logs/error_log for more details
t/api/lookup_uridubious
Test returned status 29 (wstat 7424, 0x1d00)
t/ap
111 is exiting
END in modperl_extra.pl, pid=6111
[Thu Dec 09 08:34:00 2004] [info] Child process pid=6053 is exiting
END in modperl_extra.pl, pid=6053
[Thu Dec 09 08:34:00 2004] [info] removed PID file
/opt/local/src/modperl-2.0/t/logs/httpd.pid (pid=6046)
[Thu Dec 09 08:34:00 2004] [notice] caugh
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 16:45:52 -0500
> From: Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jie Gao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [mp2] modperl-2.0_20041207171655 test fails
>
> Jie Gao wrote:
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 18:03:35 -0500
> From: Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jie Gao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [mp2] modperl-2.0_20041207171655 test fails
>
> Jie Gao wrote:
>
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 18:54:23 -0500
> From: Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jie Gao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [mp2] modperl-2.0_20041207171655 test fails
>
> Jie Gao wrote
Apache/2.0.51 (prefork MPM) + perl-5.8.5_non_threaded on Debian Woody (stable):
All tests passed.
Apache/2.0.51 (prefork) + perl5.8.3 non_threaded on Solaris 8: All tests passed.
-Jie
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
es to hug my notebook?
>
> This can also help this problem reported not once by users:
> http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/troubleshooting/troubleshooting.html#Server_Hanging_at_the_Startup
Use /dev/urandom, which will not block.
Regards,
Jie
> --
> ___
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all mp developers. Thank you very much!
Jie
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mod_perl-2.0.0-RC6 + perl 5.8.3 + apache 2.0.45 prefork "make test"
successfully on Solaris 9 on Sun sparc (Ultra-5_10).
Jie
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
builds and tests fine on sunos 5.8 generic_108528-11 sun4u sparc sunw,ultra-5_10
based on perl5 (revision 5 version 8 subversion 5) + Apache/2.0.54 (prefork and
DSO).
Jie
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Hi All,
perl-5.8.3_threaded + apache_2.0.49 on SunOS 5.9 Generic_118558-11 sun4u sparc
SUNW,Ultra-5_10:
All tests successful.
Regards,
Jie
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Jie Gao wrote:
> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:21:13 +1000 (EST)
> From: Jie Gao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: mod_perl Dev ,
> mod_perl list
> Subject: Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] mod_perl-2.0.2 RC1 All tests successful
> on solaris 9 sp
Download the lastest snapshot. I got a screenful of test failures
with this combination, with the latest Apache 2.2, with mod_perl 2.0.4
yesterday. The snapshot tested clean. -Jie
* Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2010 18:15:25 -0700
> From: "Randal L. Schwartz"
* Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2010 21:07:35 -0700
> From: "Randal L. Schwartz"
> To: Jie Gao
> Cc: mod_perl Dev
> Subject: Re: perl5.10.1 and mod_perl 2.0.4 break on "my_perl"
> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berk
> the high performance and deep integration into APR and HTTPd.
I totally agree!
The quality design and code by Doug MacEachern laid the foundation. And
thanks to Stas Bekman for the 2.0!
-Jie
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@perl.apache.org
Hi All
It seems that $r->uri returns the URI string with %20 decoded to white space,
but leaves "+" unchanged.
Is this the right behaviour?
Jie
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@perl.apache.org
For additi
Thanks for your reply.
Now if I want to get a work-around within mod_perl, what would you do?
Jie Gao | Systems Administrator
Information and Communications Technology
THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY
316 Abercrombie Street Building G17 | The University of Sydney | NSW | 2006
T +61 2 8627 7824 | E j
ithreads problem? See: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.mod-perl/5386
-Jie
* David E. Wheeler wrote:
> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 23:22:39 -0700
> From: "David E. Wheeler"
> To: mod_perl Dev
> Subject: Core Dump on Perl 5.14
> X-Mailer: Apple Ma
hould follow the procedures as below:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/help/help.html#Reporting_Problems
Regards,
Jie
* Fairlight wrote:
> Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 13:03:37 -0400
> From: Fairlight
> To: dev@perl.apache.org
> Subject: mod_perl2 on CentOS 6 compile issue
&
Hi Fred
Sorry, my mistake, for I thought it was thinking 2.4.4!
Regards,
Jie Gao | Systems Administrator
Information and Communications Technology
THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY
316 Abercrombie Street Building G17 | The University of Sydney | NSW | 2006
T +61 2 8627 7824 | E j@sydney.edu.au
W. Rowe Jr would be much appreciated.
Regards,
Jie
* William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 11:23:33 -0500
> From: William A Rowe Jr
> To: httpd , modp...@perl.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New segfault with 2.4.20 with mod_perl
>
> Re-sending to include the correct pe
/usr/local/httpd-2.4.20/bin/httpd -core
/usr/local/src/mod_perl-2.0/t/core.15035
-Jie
* Jie Gao wrote:
> Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 16:02:17 +1000
> From: Jie Gao
> To: dev@perl.apache.org, modp...@perl.apache.org
> CC: William A Rowe Jr
> Subject: Re: New segfault with 2.4.20
* Ruben Safir wrote:
> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 11:48:03 -0400
> From: Ruben Safir
> To: Jie Gao
> CC: Steve Hay , dev@perl.apache.org,
> "modp...@perl.apache.org"
> Subject: Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Reload 0.13 RC2
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
+1 on RHEL6.8:
Perl v5.20.2 + Apache 2.4.23 (with default configuration build).
.
* Steve Hay wrote:
> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 18:09:24 +0100
> From: Steve Hay
> To: Steve Hay
> CC: test-...@perl.apache.org, dev@perl.apache.org,
> "modp...@perl.apache.org" , d...@httpd.apache.org
> Subjec
+1 on RHEL6.8:
Bundled Perl v5.10.1 + Apache 2.4.23 (with default configuration build).
+1 on Ubuntu v16.04.1:
Bundled Perl v5.22.1 + Apache 2.4.23 (with default configuration build).
* Steve Hay wrote:
> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 18:09:24 +0100
> From: Steve Hay
> To: Steve Hay
> CC: test-..
+1 on RHEL6.8:
Bundled Perl v5.10.1 + Apache 2.2.31 (with default configuration build).
Perl v5.20.2 + Apache 2.2.31 (with default configuration build).
+1 on Ubuntu v16.04.1:
Bundled Perl v5.22.1 + Apache 2.2.31 (with default configuration build).
-Jie
> +1 on RHEL6.8:
>
> Bundled Perl v5.10.1 + Apache 2.4.23 (with default configuration build).
Without mod_perl-SVN and with LWP-5.833.
> +1 on Ubuntu v16.04.1:
>
> Bundled Perl v5.22.1 + Apache 2.4.23 (with default configuration build).
Without mod_perl-SVN and with
> +1 on RHEL6.8:
>
> Perl v5.20.2 + Apache 2.4.23 (with default configuration build).
Without mod_perl-SVN and with LWP-5.835.
-Jie
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@perl.apache.org
For additional command
ild).
>
> Without mod_perl-SVN and with LWP-5.835.
Sorry got mixed up: Should be Without mod_perl-SVN and with LWP-6.15.
-Jie
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@perl.apache.org
local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.18.2
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.18.0
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl
.
*** Packages of interest status:
Apache2: -
Apache2::Request : -
CGI: 3.65
ExtUtils::MakeMaker: 6.98
LWP: 5.837
mod_perl
PERL_DONT_CREATE_GVSV
PERL_HASH_FUNC_ONE_AT_A_TIME_HARD
PERL_IMPLICIT_CONTEXT PERL_MALLOC_WRAP
PERL_NEW_COPY_ON_WRITE PERL_PRESERVE_IVUV
USE_64_BIT_ALL USE_64_BIT_INT USE_ITHREADS
ages of interest status:
Apache2: -
Apache2::Request : -
CGI: 4.26
ExtUtils::MakeMaker: 7.04_01
LWP: 6.15
mod_perl : -
mod_perl2 : 2.09
3. This is the core dump trace: (if you get a core dump):
[CORE TRACE COMES HERE]
This report wa
My test result as follows:
t/filter/in_bbs_inject_header.t . 1/? # Failed test 22 in
t/filter/in_bbs_inject_header.t at line 58 fail #6
# Failed test 26 in t/filter/in_bbs_inject_header.t at line 58 fail #7
# Failed test 30 in t/filter/in_bbs_inject_header.t at line 58 fail #8
Test Summ
47 matches
Mail list logo
