[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3334) ConnectionQueryServicesImpl should close HConnection if init fails

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor updated PHOENIX-3334: -- Assignee: Samarth Jain > ConnectionQueryServicesImpl should close HConnection if init fails >

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3334) ConnectionQueryServicesImpl should close HConnection if init fails

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor updated PHOENIX-3334: -- Fix Version/s: 4.9.0 > ConnectionQueryServicesImpl should close HConnection if init fails >

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3315) property object is being modified

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor updated PHOENIX-3315: -- Fix Version/s: 4.9.0 > property object is being modified > -

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-476) Support declaration of DEFAULT in CREATE statement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15524970#comment-15524970 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-476: -- Please make the changes I recommended and let me know if

[jira] [Assigned] (PHOENIX-3315) property object is being modified

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Prabhjyot Singh reassigned PHOENIX-3315: Assignee: Prabhjyot Singh > property object is being modified >

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3315) property object is being modified

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Prabhjyot Singh updated PHOENIX-3315: - Assignee: Josh Elser (was: Prabhjyot Singh) > property object is being modified >

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PHOENIX-476) Support declaration of DEFAULT in CREATE statement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15524834#comment-15524834 ] Kevin Liew edited comment on PHOENIX-476 at 9/27/16 2:41 AM: - I did take a

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PHOENIX-476) Support declaration of DEFAULT in CREATE statement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15524834#comment-15524834 ] Kevin Liew edited comment on PHOENIX-476 at 9/27/16 2:40 AM: - I did take a

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PHOENIX-476) Support declaration of DEFAULT in CREATE statement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15524834#comment-15524834 ] Kevin Liew edited comment on PHOENIX-476 at 9/27/16 2:38 AM: - I did take a

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PHOENIX-476) Support declaration of DEFAULT in CREATE statement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15524834#comment-15524834 ] Kevin Liew edited comment on PHOENIX-476 at 9/27/16 2:38 AM: - I did take a

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-476) Support declaration of DEFAULT in CREATE statement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15524834#comment-15524834 ] Kevin Liew commented on PHOENIX-476: I did take a look at `PRowImpl.setValue` but that only

Re: [VOTE] The first rc (RC0) for Phoenix 4.8.1 is available

Thanks for the confirmation, Lars! I just wanted to make sure that we didn't accidentally miss this step (assuming rc0 passes). la...@apache.org wrote: My key is the KEYS file in the dev directory only. Will load into KEYS file you mention. My key's fingerprint is A1A7 5143 64FB 05BC C9A1

Re: [VOTE] The first rc (RC0) for Phoenix 4.8.1 is available

+1. Downloaded, compiled, and verified all unit tests pass. James On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 8:55 PM, wrote: > My key is the KEYS file in the dev directory only. > Will load into KEYS file you mention. > My key's fingerprint is A1A7 5143 64FB 05BC C9A1 5A9D D0BE B8C5 C7CF

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-3334) ConnectionQueryServicesImpl should close HConnection if init fails

Vincent Poon created PHOENIX-3334: - Summary: ConnectionQueryServicesImpl should close HConnection if init fails Key: PHOENIX-3334 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3334 Project:

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3181) Run test methods in parallel to reduce test suite run time

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15524318#comment-15524318 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3181: --- Thanks, [~prakul]. Things work locally now well - I can

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3181) Run test methods in parallel to reduce test suite run time

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15524231#comment-15524231 ] prakul agarwal commented on PHOENIX-3181: - Oh wow! seems we got some consistency. Its so weird

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-3333) can not load phoenix table by spark 2.0 which is working well under spark 1.6

dalin qin created PHOENIX-: -- Summary: can not load phoenix table by spark 2.0 which is working well under spark 1.6 Key: PHOENIX- URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX- Project:

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PHOENIX-3326) Restoring SYSTEM.CATALOG from snapshot causes clients to run into UpgradeInProgressException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15523736#comment-15523736 ] James Taylor edited comment on PHOENIX-3326 at 9/26/16 5:53 PM:

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (PHOENIX-3326) Restoring SYSTEM.CATALOG from snapshot causes clients to run into UpgradeInProgressException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor updated PHOENIX-3326: -- Comment: was deleted (was: [~samarthjain] - for 4.9.0, can we create a couple of new

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PHOENIX-3326) Restoring SYSTEM.CATALOG from snapshot causes clients to run into UpgradeInProgressException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15523736#comment-15523736 ] James Taylor edited comment on PHOENIX-3326 at 9/26/16 5:53 PM:

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3326) Restoring SYSTEM.CATALOG from snapshot causes clients to run into UpgradeInProgressException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15523736#comment-15523736 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3326: --- [~samarthjain] - for 4.9.0, can we create a couple of new

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3326) Restoring SYSTEM.CATALOG from snapshot causes clients to run into UpgradeInProgressException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15523734#comment-15523734 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3326: --- [~samarthjain] - for 4.9.0, can we create a couple of new

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3326) Restoring SYSTEM.CATALOG from snapshot causes clients to run into UpgradeInProgressException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated PHOENIX-3326: --- Affects Version/s: 4.8.1 > Restoring SYSTEM.CATALOG from snapshot causes clients to run

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3326) Restoring SYSTEM.CATALOG from snapshot causes clients to run into UpgradeInProgressException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated PHOENIX-3326: --- Fix Version/s: 4.8.2 4.9.0 > Restoring SYSTEM.CATALOG from snapshot

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3326) Restoring SYSTEM.CATALOG from snapshot causes clients to run into UpgradeInProgressException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15523683#comment-15523683 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-3326: Thanks James. Agreed. I'll mark this one for 4.8.2 and

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3326) Restoring SYSTEM.CATALOG from snapshot causes clients to run into UpgradeInProgressException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15523651#comment-15523651 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3326: --- Sorry for any confusion. Leaving the snapshot code in

Problem with Pig 0.16 and Phoenix 4.8

Hi, I use Phoenix since 1 year under Phoenix 4.6 / Pig 0.12 / Cloudera CDH 5.4.1 Since we have migrated to pig 0.16 / Phoenix 4.8 / Hadoop 2.7 / JDK 1.8 load and store are broken. We always have reducers fail, sometimes job fails sometimes it succeded : 2016-09-26 14:48:37,509 WARN [main]

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3298) Create Table: Single column primary key may not be null

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15523354#comment-15523354 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3298: --- Yes, we'd still want to throw an exception in that case.

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PHOENIX-476) Support declaration of DEFAULT in CREATE statement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15523344#comment-15523344 ] James Taylor edited comment on PHOENIX-476 at 9/26/16 3:15 PM: --- bq. I think

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-476) Support declaration of DEFAULT in CREATE statement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15523344#comment-15523344 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-476: -- bq. I think that given the constraints that we have now, we

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3298) Create Table: Single column primary key may not be null

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15523313#comment-15523313 ] Eric Lomore commented on PHOENIX-3298: -- Before I finish up on this, I wanted to find out the

Re: Comprehensive Guide for EXPLAIN

Hi Bernard, No, unfortunately there's no documentation for our explain plan (PHOENIX-1481). In your example, it's not fetching everything from the server. If it fetches everything from the server it would say "FULL TABLE SCAN". In this case, it's doing a "RANGE SCAN" between these two key ranges:

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-3332) Secondary Indexes being ignored even with hints when addressing dynamic columns

Eric Yang created PHOENIX-3332: -- Summary: Secondary Indexes being ignored even with hints when addressing dynamic columns Key: PHOENIX-3332 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3332

Comprehensive Guide for EXPLAIN

Hi, I know explain statement results are relatively easy to understand but is there a comprehensive guide for it? 0: jdbc:phoenix:localhost> explain select count(1) from test.table where insert_ts > now() - 30; *+--+* *| ** PLAN

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3331) Bug in calculating minDisabledTimestamp for a batch

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15522988#comment-15522988 ] Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla commented on PHOENIX-3331: -- +1. Good catch [~an...@apache.org].

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3331) Bug in calculating minDisabledTimestamp for a batch

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15522938#comment-15522938 ] Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-3331: {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2890) Extend IndexTool to allow incremental index rebuilds

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15522893#comment-15522893 ] Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-2890: {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3159) CachingHTableFactory may close HTable during eviction even if it is getting used for writing by another thread.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ankit Singhal updated PHOENIX-3159: --- Attachment: PHOENIX-3159_v4.patch Thank you [~devaraj] for the feedback. bq. 1. Shouldn't

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3254) IndexId Sequence is incremented even if index exists already.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ankit Singhal updated PHOENIX-3254: --- Attachment: PHOENIX-3254.patch [~rajeshbabu], please review. > IndexId Sequence is

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3331) Bug in calculating minDisabledTimestamp for a batch

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ankit Singhal updated PHOENIX-3331: --- Attachment: PHOENIX-3331.patch > Bug in calculating minDisabledTimestamp for a batch >

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-3331) Bug in calculating minDisabledTimestamp for a batch

Ankit Singhal created PHOENIX-3331: -- Summary: Bug in calculating minDisabledTimestamp for a batch Key: PHOENIX-3331 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3331 Project: Phoenix

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2890) Extend IndexTool to allow incremental index rebuilds

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ankit Singhal updated PHOENIX-2890: --- Attachment: PHOENIX-2890.patch [~giacomotaylor]/[~rajeshbabu], please review. > Extend

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-476) Support declaration of DEFAULT in CREATE statement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15522376#comment-15522376 ] Kevin Liew commented on PHOENIX-476: Though I can see how this JIRA could be a large optimization for

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PHOENIX-476) Support declaration of DEFAULT in CREATE statement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=1551#comment-1551 ] Kevin Liew edited comment on PHOENIX-476 at 9/26/16 6:43 AM: - Thanks for the

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-3326) Restoring SYSTEM.CATALOG from snapshot causes clients to run into UpgradeInProgressException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15522219#comment-15522219 ] Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-3326: --- Another option would be to delete the row corresponding

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-476) Support declaration of DEFAULT in CREATE statement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=1551#comment-1551 ] Kevin Liew commented on PHOENIX-476: Thanks for the feedback guys. I investigated some more and I