[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13479402#comment-13479402
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-2975:
---
bq. Result incorrect (when order-by used). [0.11 and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13479404#comment-13479404
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-2975:
---
Silly me. Result of above script was
{noformat}
(0)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13480103#comment-13480103
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-2975:
---
bq. I don't think we need to sacrifice performance if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13480153#comment-13480153
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-2975:
---
bq. I am going to roll up my sleeves and do this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-2975:
--
Attachment: PIG-2975-0_jco-v2.patch
Thanks Jonathan!
bq. 1. we could just do the comparison via calls
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-2975:
--
Attachment: pig-2975-trunk_v03-unionapproach.txt
bq. 2. We could just make a custom WritableComparator
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13480296#comment-13480296
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-2975:
---
Forgot to mention one more alternative. Take out the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13480301#comment-13480301
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-2975:
---
bq. As far as the switch approach, I don't think it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13480340#comment-13480340
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-2975:
---
bq. by including the 4 bytes in the comparison I am
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-2975:
--
Attachment: pig-2975-trunk_v04-purerawcompare.txt
||patch ||correctness||byte
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13480413#comment-13480413
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-2975:
---
{quote}
pig-2975-trunk_v04-purerawcompare.txt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13480442#comment-13480442
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-2975:
---
bq. One thing I worry about this new sort order is,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-2975:
--
Attachment:
pig-2975-trunk_v05-BinInterSedesRawComparatorAndlightweight-withouttest.txt
bq. or we can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-2975:
--
Attachment:
pig-2975-trunk_v05-BinInterSedesRawComparatorAndlightweight-withtest.txt
Attaching patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-2975:
--
Attachment:
pig-2975-trunk_v05-BinInterSedesRawComparatorAndlightweight-withtest2.txt
bq. statically
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13481761#comment-13481761
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-2975:
---
bq. Would it have been the same before?
Yes. My test
Koji Noguchi created PIG-2999:
-
Summary: Regression after PIG-2975:
BinInterSedesTupleRawComparator secondary sort failing
Key: PIG-2999
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2999
Project: Pig
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13482077#comment-13482077
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-2975:
---
bq. Now I am running all the tests with your fix and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-2999:
--
Attachment: pig-2999-v1.txt
During the performance test in pig-2975, I made a change inside
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-2999:
--
Assignee: Jonathan Coveney
Regression after PIG-2975: BinInterSedesTupleRawComparator secondary
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13482088#comment-13482088
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-2999:
---
Thanks Jonathan, Gianmarco.
bq. Can you post the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13482095#comment-13482095
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-2999:
---
bq. and more.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13482381#comment-13482381
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-2999:
---
After patch 'pig-2999-v1.txt' is applied, previous
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-2999:
--
Attachment: pig-2999-v2.txt
In WritableComparator, it converts to 'int' and then compare.
{noformat}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13482934#comment-13482934
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-2999:
---
bq. less than tuple with greater value expected:-1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13483832#comment-13483832
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-2999:
---
Thanks for fixing the mess I've made!
bq. I am
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-2968:
--
Fix Version/s: 0.11
I'd like to see this fixed in 0.11.
ColumnMapKeyPrune fails to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-2968:
--
Attachment: pig-2968-trunk_v03.txt
bq. Actually, can you please fix the indentation of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13487980#comment-13487980
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-2474:
---
bq. Duplicate of PIG-2119.
Was this fixed in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13489578#comment-13489578
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-2970:
---
bq. Can you give more info on why you would like to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13489602#comment-13489602
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-2970:
---
bq. for optimization purposes (and not for
Koji Noguchi created PIG-3051:
-
Summary: java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException failure with
LimitOptimizer + ColumnPruning
Key: PIG-3051
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3051
Project: Pig
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498150#comment-13498150
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-3051:
---
Stack dump from task failure using trunk
{noformat}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498165#comment-13498165
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-3051:
---
Tracking the LogicalPlan change.
Original.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498166#comment-13498166
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-3051:
---
Sorry, After ColumnMapKeyPrune, I pasted the wrong
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-3051:
--
Attachment: pig-3051-v1-withouttest.txt
There must be a better way/method than this but I hope the patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13498190#comment-13498190
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-3051:
---
Sorry, I missed Bill's comment.
bq. We've seen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13499345#comment-13499345
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-3051:
---
bq. I couldn't reproduce this with short pig code
Koji Noguchi created PIG-3056:
-
Summary: CLONE - PigStorageSchema need to deal with missing field
Key: PIG-3056
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3056
Project: Pig
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-3056:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.10.0)
CLONE - PigStorageSchema need to deal with missing field
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13500468#comment-13500468
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-2127:
---
bq. Vivek,
bq. Please open a new jira linked to this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-3051:
--
Attachment: pig-3051-v1.1-withe2etest.txt
Added an e2e test since I needed columnprune + limitoptimizer.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-3051:
--
Fix Version/s: 0.11
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Requesting for 0.11 if possible.
Koji Noguchi created PIG-3072:
-
Summary: Pig job reporting negative progress
Key: PIG-3072
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3072
Project: Pig
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-3072:
--
Attachment: pig-3072-v01.txt
'pos' inside TFileRecordReader was never updated. Using fileIn.getPos()
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-3072:
--
Attachment: pig-3072-v02.txt
bq. Can we create the basic.tfile using Util.createTempFileDelOnExit().
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-3072:
--
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Pig job reporting negative progress
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-3072:
--
Attachment: pig-3072-v03.txt
(Minor changes to previous v02 patch.)
* Added comment in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-3072:
--
Attachment: pig-3072-v04.txt
bq. Can you use HadoopShims to create the TaskAttemptContext in your test.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi resolved PIG-2802.
---
Resolution: Duplicate
Wrong Schema generated when there is a dangling alias
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-3051:
--
Attachment: pig-3051-v2.1-withe2etest.txt
Thanks Rohini for the review.
bq .But found an issue with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13537287#comment-13537287
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-3100:
---
I should have commented on PIG-3056, but when our
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13537302#comment-13537302
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-3100:
---
bq. Perhaps there can be a flag or setting for
Koji Noguchi created PIG-3102:
-
Summary: Option for PigStorage load to error out when input record
is incomplete (instead of filling in null)
Key: PIG-3102
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3102
Koji Noguchi created PIG-3147:
-
Summary: Spill failing with java.lang.RuntimeException:
InternalCachedBag.spill() should not be called
Key: PIG-3147
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3147
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13565698#comment-13565698
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-3147:
---
Dumping a stacktrace when InternalCacheBag is added
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2923?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13565705#comment-13565705
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-2923:
---
Hi Dmitriy, I'm seeing a weird error when pig 0.11
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-3147:
--
Attachment: pig-3147-v01.txt
Reading PIG-975, InternalCachedBag should not register with
Koji Noguchi created PIG-3148:
-
Summary: OutOfMemory exception while spilling stale
DefaultDataBag. Extra option to gc() before spilling large bag.
Key: PIG-3148
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3148
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13565975#comment-13565975
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-3148:
---
I cannot attach the original query, but to give you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-3148:
--
Attachment: pig-3148-v01.patch
Uploading a patch that adds a feature that would call System.gc() when
Koji Noguchi created PIG-3178:
-
Summary: Print a stacktrace when ExecutableManager hits an OOM
Key: PIG-3178
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3178
Project: Pig
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-3178:
--
Attachment: pig-3178-trunk-v01.patch
Adding printStackTrace call. Since it's only a logging change, no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-3178:
--
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Print a stacktrace when ExecutableManager hits an OOM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575869#comment-13575869
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-3178:
---
bq. Doesn't LOG.error(t); log the stacktrace?
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-3178:
--
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
Print a stacktrace when ExecutableManager hits an OOM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-3178:
--
Attachment: pig-3178-trunk-v02.patch
bq. Can you just add a message - LOG.error(Error running blah blah,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-3178:
--
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Print a stacktrace when ExecutableManager hits an OOM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-3178:
--
Attachment: pig-3178-trunk-v03.patch
Sorry for the spam. Rohini pointed out that last patch was based
Koji Noguchi created PIG-3179:
-
Summary: Task Information Header only prints out the first split
for each task
Key: PIG-3179
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3179
Project: Pig
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-3179:
--
Attachment: pig-3179-v01.patch
Added for-loop to print all the splits.
Task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-3179:
--
Attachment: pig-3179-v02.patch
Changed based on Rohini's suggestion.
Added extra line printing out the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-3179:
--
Attachment: pig-3179-v03.patch
bq. Hi Koji Noguchi, minor thing - calling toString on Path might be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-3179:
--
Attachment: pig-3179-v04.patch
bq. Can you reuse the StringBuilder. i.e move StringBuilder sb = new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13577743#comment-13577743
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-3148:
---
Rohini asked me to clarify why I'm adding extra param
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13578507#comment-13578507
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-3148:
---
Thanks Dmitriy, Rohini! I like the fixed ratio
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-3148:
--
Attachment: pig-3148-v02.patch
Sorry for the delay. Attaching a patch with suggested change.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13603583#comment-13603583
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-2597:
---
bq. Jonathan, any update on this?
I'm interested in
Koji Noguchi created PIG-3251:
-
Summary: Bzip2TextInputFormat requires double the memory of
maximum record size
Key: PIG-3251
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3251
Project: Pig
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-3251:
--
Attachment: pig-3251-trunk-v01.patch
In Bzip2TextInputFormat, it says
{code}
/**
*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13606445#comment-13606445
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-3251:
---
bq. Let me know if you find any problem in your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-3251:
--
Attachment: pig-3251-trunk-v02.patch
(1)
Current status (before any patch)
||hadoop version ||
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13607860#comment-13607860
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-3251:
---
bq. With HADOOP-7823, can we remove
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13607886#comment-13607886
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-3251:
---
bq. With HADOOP-7823, can we remove
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-3251:
--
Attachment: pig-3251-trunk-v03.patch
bq. Makes sense, we shall move to the new approach for Hadoop
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13608227#comment-13608227
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-3255:
---
+1 Looks good to me.
Probably another Jira, but I
Koji Noguchi created PIG-3266:
-
Summary: Pig takes forever to parse scripts with foreach + multi
level binconds
Key: PIG-3266
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3266
Project: Pig
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13620098#comment-13620098
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-3266:
---
If I revert the change from PIG:1387, parsing speed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13620158#comment-13620158
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-3266:
---
bq. Does it finish in the end, or never?
I would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13621115#comment-13621115
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-3266:
---
Does it finish in the end, or never?
I would guess
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13621155#comment-13621155
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-3261:
---
I prefer with PIG_USER_CLASSPATH_FIRST. I've seen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13621178#comment-13621178
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-3266:
---
bq. I assume there is an infinite loop. Next time
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13621230#comment-13621230
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-3266:
---
bq. Koji Noguchi, I think this was fixed. I don't see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi resolved PIG-3266.
---
Resolution: Duplicate
Release Note: Found it. This is a duplicate of PIG-2769. Sorry Xuefu for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-3266:
--
Release Note: (was: Found it. This is a duplicate of PIG-2769. Sorry
Xuefu for wasting your time on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13622731#comment-13622731
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-2769:
---
bq. We should put this into 0.11 branch, maybe there
Koji Noguchi created PIG-3270:
-
Summary: Union onschema failing at runtime when merging
incompatible types
Key: PIG-3270
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3270
Project: Pig
Issue
Koji Noguchi created PIG-3271:
-
Summary: POSplit ignoring error from input processing giving empty
results
Key: PIG-3271
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3271
Project: Pig
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-3271:
--
Attachment: pig-3271-v01.patch
I'm having hard time tracking the code but this seems to catch the error.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-3271:
--
Attachment: pig-3271-v02.patch
bq. Ready to go with a testcase.
I'm lost in this.
Original example
1 - 100 of 1099 matches
Mail list logo
