Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.10.1 (candidate 3)
With 3 binding +1 (Alan, Thejas and I) and 3 non-binding +1 (Rohini, Jarek and Cheolsoo), the vote pass. I will start the release process. Thanks, Daniel On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Cheolsoo Park cheol...@cloudera.com wrote: +1. Tested against hadoop 1.0.x and 2.0.x clusters. On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho jar...@apache.orgwrote: +1 (non-binding) * Verified checksum * Verified signatures * Tests seems to be passing * Checked top level files (NOTICE, LICENSE) Note: I personally prefer when all third party jars are explicitly mentioned in LICENSE file as is recommend in [1] (and used for example in [2], [3], [4]), but that is not required. Jarcec Links: 1: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-license 2: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/examples/LICENSE 3: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=blob;f=LICENSE.txt;h=00b52964892971fea9280a6201b7efe11a2527e5;hb=sqoop2 4: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=blob;f=LICENSE;h=04c1baf1e0aedfca63f81cff2d64593d8ab55f09;hb=58173b8983027124a61783b4326dee3347ab7552 On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 06:16:33PM -0800, Thejas Nair wrote: +1 Verified md5 checksums of src and binary tar.gz . Build the src tar.gz and ran queries against a hadoop 1.1 cluster, ran fs and sh commands. -Thejas On 1/3/13 12:11 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy wrote: +1. Downloaded the tar binary, checked signature, ran unit tests, piggybank unit tests, checked docs/release notes, ran a simple script locally and against a cluster. On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Alan Gates ga...@hortonworks.com wrote: +1, yet again :). Checked the key signature and checksum on the source package. Built and ran commit unit tests on src, ran a test job in local mode. Downloaded the tar binary and ran a job in local and cluster mode. Alan. On Dec 28, 2012, at 11:50 PM, Daniel Dai wrote: Hi, I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.10.1. This is a maintenance release of Pig 0.10. Keys used to sign the release are available at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup Please download, test, and try it out: http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.10.1-candidate-3/ Should we release this? Vote closes on EOD next Friday, Jan 4th. Thanks, Daniel
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.10.1 (candidate 3)
+1. Tested against hadoop 1.0.x and 2.0.x clusters. On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho jar...@apache.orgwrote: +1 (non-binding) * Verified checksum * Verified signatures * Tests seems to be passing * Checked top level files (NOTICE, LICENSE) Note: I personally prefer when all third party jars are explicitly mentioned in LICENSE file as is recommend in [1] (and used for example in [2], [3], [4]), but that is not required. Jarcec Links: 1: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-license 2: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/examples/LICENSE 3: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=blob;f=LICENSE.txt;h=00b52964892971fea9280a6201b7efe11a2527e5;hb=sqoop2 4: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=blob;f=LICENSE;h=04c1baf1e0aedfca63f81cff2d64593d8ab55f09;hb=58173b8983027124a61783b4326dee3347ab7552 On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 06:16:33PM -0800, Thejas Nair wrote: +1 Verified md5 checksums of src and binary tar.gz . Build the src tar.gz and ran queries against a hadoop 1.1 cluster, ran fs and sh commands. -Thejas On 1/3/13 12:11 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy wrote: +1. Downloaded the tar binary, checked signature, ran unit tests, piggybank unit tests, checked docs/release notes, ran a simple script locally and against a cluster. On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Alan Gates ga...@hortonworks.com wrote: +1, yet again :). Checked the key signature and checksum on the source package. Built and ran commit unit tests on src, ran a test job in local mode. Downloaded the tar binary and ran a job in local and cluster mode. Alan. On Dec 28, 2012, at 11:50 PM, Daniel Dai wrote: Hi, I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.10.1. This is a maintenance release of Pig 0.10. Keys used to sign the release are available at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup Please download, test, and try it out: http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.10.1-candidate-3/ Should we release this? Vote closes on EOD next Friday, Jan 4th. Thanks, Daniel
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.10.1 (candidate 3)
+1. Downloaded the tar binary, checked signature, ran unit tests, piggybank unit tests, checked docs/release notes, ran a simple script locally and against a cluster. On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Alan Gates ga...@hortonworks.com wrote: +1, yet again :). Checked the key signature and checksum on the source package. Built and ran commit unit tests on src, ran a test job in local mode. Downloaded the tar binary and ran a job in local and cluster mode. Alan. On Dec 28, 2012, at 11:50 PM, Daniel Dai wrote: Hi, I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.10.1. This is a maintenance release of Pig 0.10. Keys used to sign the release are available at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup Please download, test, and try it out: http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.10.1-candidate-3/ Should we release this? Vote closes on EOD next Friday, Jan 4th. Thanks, Daniel
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.10.1 (candidate 3)
+1 Verified md5 checksums of src and binary tar.gz . Build the src tar.gz and ran queries against a hadoop 1.1 cluster, ran fs and sh commands. -Thejas On 1/3/13 12:11 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy wrote: +1. Downloaded the tar binary, checked signature, ran unit tests, piggybank unit tests, checked docs/release notes, ran a simple script locally and against a cluster. On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Alan Gates ga...@hortonworks.com wrote: +1, yet again :). Checked the key signature and checksum on the source package. Built and ran commit unit tests on src, ran a test job in local mode. Downloaded the tar binary and ran a job in local and cluster mode. Alan. On Dec 28, 2012, at 11:50 PM, Daniel Dai wrote: Hi, I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.10.1. This is a maintenance release of Pig 0.10. Keys used to sign the release are available at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup Please download, test, and try it out: http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.10.1-candidate-3/ Should we release this? Vote closes on EOD next Friday, Jan 4th. Thanks, Daniel
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.10.1 (candidate 3)
+1, yet again :). Checked the key signature and checksum on the source package. Built and ran commit unit tests on src, ran a test job in local mode. Downloaded the tar binary and ran a job in local and cluster mode. Alan. On Dec 28, 2012, at 11:50 PM, Daniel Dai wrote: Hi, I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.10.1. This is a maintenance release of Pig 0.10. Keys used to sign the release are available at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup Please download, test, and try it out: http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.10.1-candidate-3/ Should we release this? Vote closes on EOD next Friday, Jan 4th. Thanks, Daniel
[VOTE] Release Pig 0.10.1 (candidate 3)
Hi, I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.10.1. This is a maintenance release of Pig 0.10. Keys used to sign the release are available at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup Please download, test, and try it out: http://people.apache.org/~daijy/pig-0.10.1-candidate-3/ Should we release this? Vote closes on EOD next Friday, Jan 4th. Thanks, Daniel
