Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot 1.1.0 RC1

+1 (binding) > On Mar 16, 2024, at 9:38 AM, Subbu Subramaniam wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > -Subbu Subramaniam > Apache PMC > >> On 2024/03/07 04:03:58 Vivek Iyer Vaidyanathan Iyer wrote: >> Hi Pinot Community, >> >> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Pinot 1.1.0 >> >> The release

Re: Apache pinot release 1.0.0 RC3 voting

+1 [binding] > On Sep 12, 2023, at 6:04 PM, Subbu Subramaniam wrote: > > Verified > > +1 [Binding] > > -Subbu Subramaniam > Apache Pinot PMC > >> On 2023/09/12 10:02:26 saurabh dubey wrote: >> Hi Pinot Community, >> >> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Pinot 1.0.0 >> >> The

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot 0.12.1 RC0

+1 On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 6:49 PM Abhishek Sharma wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 8:01 PM Fu Xiang wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 4:57 PM Xiaotian Jiang >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 10:24 PM Rong Rong wrote: >>> Hi Pinot Community,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot 0.12.0 RC0

+1 (binding) On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 3:52 PM Subbu Subramaniam wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Verified on Centos Linux 7.9.2009 > > -Subbu > -- > *From:* Xiang Fu > *Sent:* Friday, January 20, 2023 3:18 PM > *To:* Xiang Fu > *Cc:* dev@pinot.apache.org > *Subject:* Re:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot 0.11.0 RC1

+1 > On Sep 4, 2022, at 6:29 PM, Xiaotian Jiang wrote: > >  > +1 > >> On Sun, Sep 4, 2022 at 18:57 Xiang Fu wrote: >> Hi Pinot Community, >> >> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Pinot 0.11.0. >> >> The release candidate: >>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot 0.11.0 RC0

+1 > On Sep 1, 2022, at 10:21 PM, Neha Pawar wrote: > >  > +1. > Validated as per steps in > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/PINOT/Validating+a+release+candidate > . > > Thanks, > Neha Pawar > > > >> On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 4:26 PM Xiang Fu wrote: >> Hi Pinot Community, >>

Re: pinot-controller NPM security issues

come along and exploit > these issues. > >> On 2022/04/07 13:28:06 Mayank Shrivastava wrote: >> Hi PJ, >> Thanks for reaching out and flagging these security issues. Seems like ASF >> does have a security guidelines >> <https://www.apache.org/security/committers.

Re: pinot-controller NPM security issues

Hi PJ, Thanks for reaching out and flagging these security issues. Seems like ASF does have a security guidelines , one of which suggests to not expose the insecurity via GH issue/jira or direct PR. I do see that you have mentioned the security

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot 0.9.3 RC0

+1 > On Dec 24, 2021, at 3:22 AM, Richard Startin > wrote: > >  > +1 > >> On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 10:17 AM Atri Sharma wrote: >> +1 >> >>> On Fri, 24 Dec 2021, 15:41 Xiang Fu, wrote: >>> Hi Pinot Community, >>> >>> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Pinot 0.9.3. >>> >>> This is

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot 0.9.2 RC0

+1 On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 9:53 PM Jialiang Li wrote: > +1 > > On 2021/12/15 05:43:45 Atri Sharma wrote: > > +1 > > > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 11:10 AM Xiang Fu > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Pinot Community, > > > > > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Pinot 0.9.2. > > > > > > This is a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot 0.9.1 RC0

+1 [binding] Verified build and quick-start. On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 10:29 PM Xiang Fu wrote: > Hi Pinot Community, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Pinot 0.9.1. > > This release fixes the major issue of CVE-2021-44228 > and a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot 0.9.0 RC0

+1 [binding] Verified using instructions at: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/PINOT/Validating+a+release+candidate Cheers, Mayank On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 10:32 PM Xiang Fu wrote: > Hi Pinot Community, This is a call for a vote to release Apache Pinot > 0.9.0. The release candidate:

Re: [Announcement] Stop PQL support after 0.9.0 release, SQL only afterward

+1 Thanks for driving this Xiang. Regards Mayank > On Sep 14, 2021, at 1:51 AM, Xiang Fu wrote: > >  > Dear Community, > > TL;DR, Pinot will remove PQL query endpoint and response format after 0.9.0 > release, only SQL endpoint is supported afterward. > > Apache Pinot has been supporting

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot 0.8.0 RC0

+1 [binding] On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 1:30 PM Yupeng Fu wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 6:53 PM Xiang Fu wrote: > >> +1 >> >> I’m using maven 3.6.2 and validated both jdk8/11. >> >> >> On Aug 12, 2021, at 4:53 PM, Yupeng Fu wrote: >> >> Thanks for updating the notes. >> >> I upgraded

[RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache Pinot as TLP

Hi, The voting for graduating Apache Pinot as a TLP is now closed. The results of voting are listed below. Binding votes: 13 +1 votes, no 0 or -1 votes. Non binding: 12 +1 notes, no 0 or -1 votes The thread can be found here

[VOTE] Graduate Apache Pinot as TLP

Apache Pinot Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Pinot Project: - Felix Cheung - Jackie Jiang - Jim Jagielski - Kishore G - Mayank Shrivastava

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Pinot (Incubating) as a TLP

Hello Justin, Sheng & IPMC Thanks so much for reviewing our proposal and your questions and suggestions. Please find our response below, and let us know if you have any questions, and suggest next steps. Decision process for PMC: We follow discussion + voting protocol for adding new PMCs. We

[DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Pinot (Incubating) as a TLP

y below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Pinot Project: - Felix Cheung - Jackie Jiang - Jim Jagielski - Kishore G - Mayank Shrivastava - Neha Pawar - Olivier Lamy - Seunghyun Lee -

[Result] [VOTE] Apache Pinot graduation to a TLP

+1 > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 10:21 AM Yupeng Fu wrote: > > > > > >> +1 > > >> > > >> On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 10:20 AM Seunghyun Lee > wrote: > > >> > > >>> +1 > > >>> > > >>>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot graduation to a TLP

: +1 Mayank Shrivastava +1 Seunghyun Lee +1 Xiang Fu +1 Subbu Subramaniam Committers: +1 Yupeng Fu On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 10:00 AM Subbu Subramaniam wrote: > +1 > > -Subbu > > On 2021/06/04 16:55:14, Mayank Shrivastava wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > As per our d

[VOTE] Apache Pinot graduation to a TLP

ung - Jackie Jiang - Jim Jagielski - Kishore G - Mayank Shrivastava - Neha Pawar - Olivier Lamy - Seunghyun Lee - Siddharth Teotia - Subbu Subramaniam - Xiang Fu NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Kishore

Re: DISCUSS Pinot Graduation

(be ready as this will generate some comments and >> more paperwork :) ) >> >> >> On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 03:14, Mayank Shrivastava wrote: >>> Mentors, >>> Gentle ping, are we good to open a vote for Pinot's graduation? We have >>> addressed all the

Re: DISCUSS Pinot Graduation

Mentors, Gentle ping, are we good to open a vote for Pinot's graduation? We have addressed all the issues brought up by Felix. Regards, Mayank On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 9:44 PM Mayank Shrivastava wrote: > Gentle ping to mentors to guide us with graduation discussion. We have > add

Re: DISCUSS Pinot Graduation

Gentle ping to mentors to guide us with graduation discussion. We have addressed the comments raised by Felix in the thread earlier. Also requesting comments from Oliver and Jim. Thanks for your help. Regards, Mayank On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 5:38 PM Mayank Shrivastava wrote: > Thanks Fe

Re: DISCUSS Pinot Graduation

rding from dev@ to slack. > > > -- > *From:* kishore g > *Sent:* Saturday, May 15, 2021 6:53 PM > *To:* dev@pinot.apache.org > *Cc:* Mayank Shrivastava; j...@apache.org; ol...@apache.org > *Subject:* Re: DISCUSS Pinot Graduation > > I agree with y

Re: DISCUSS Pinot Graduation

Mentors - Felix, Olivier, Jim, Wondering what your thoughts on are for proposing Pinot's graduation. We have addressed all the issues that have been brought up in the past. If there are other steps to be taken, please let us know and we can also take care of those as well. Looking forward to your

Re: DISCUSS Pinot Graduation

+1 on initiating the discussion on readiness for graduation. Apache Pinot now has a very strong and healthy community around it, formalizing the graduation will only help further. If there are formalities remaining we will be happy to address them. Regards Mayank > On May 9, 2021, at 7:08

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.7.1 RC0

+1 On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 3:09 PM Xiaotian Jiang wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 2:56 PM Fu Xiang wrote: > >> Hi Pinot Community, >> >> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Pinot (incubating) version >> 0.7.1. >> >> The release candidate: >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.7.0 RC1

===>] > 128 --.-KB/sin 0s > > 2021-03-10 17:26:03 (15.3 MB/s) - > ‘apache-pinot-incubating-0.7.0-bin.tar.gz.sha512’ saved [128/128] > >> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 3:49 PM Mayank Shrivastava >> wrote: >> I get the following erro

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.7.0 RC1

I get the following error with wget: wget https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/pinot/apache-pinot-incubating-$VERSION-rc$RC/apache-pinot-incubating-$VERSION-bin.tar.gz.sha512 --2021-03-10 15:47:25--

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.7.0 RC0

+1 Verified as per the steps listed. > On Mar 5, 2021, at 9:28 AM, Yupeng Fu wrote: > >  > Hi Pinot Community, > > This is a call for vote to the release Apache Pinot (incubating) version > 0.7.0. > > The release candidate: >

Re: Move thirdeye out from Pinot repo

Thanks Xiang, for helping with this move. Regards Mayank > On Feb 22, 2021, at 8:56 PM, Fu Xiang wrote: > >  > Hi team, > > As part of the Pinot 0.7.0 release effort, we will move the thirdeye project > out from the Pinot repo. > > The new repo for thirdeye will be located at >

Re: Removing PQL endpoint

Yupeng, From what I understand we are targeting graduation this quarter, with 1.0. Does that work for Uber? Cheers Mayank > On Feb 19, 2021, at 9:10 PM, Yupeng Fu wrote: > >  > Sidd, from this year we release off the master every a few weeks and don't > wait for the next Pinot release. > >

Re: Removing PQL endpoint

Thanks Xiang. Hi Ting, Will this PR help expedite the move to SQL at Uber? Cheers, Mayank > On Feb 19, 2021, at 5:41 PM, Xiang Fu wrote: > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org For additional commands,

Re: Removing PQL endpoint

I remember checking with Uber team a while back (forget if Haibo or Yupeng), I was told that Uber uses Presto to query Pinot, so it should not matter? Regards, Mayank From: Yupeng Fu Sent: Friday, February 19, 2021 3:33 PM To: dev@pinot.apache.org Cc: Ujwala

Re: Podling Pinot Report Reminder - February 2021

Done. On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 5:18 PM Mayank Shrivastava wrote: > Yes, will do. > > On Jan 31, 2021, at 2:14 PM, kishore g wrote: > >  > Mayank can you please help with this.. > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 1:59 PM Felix Cheung

Re: Podling Pinot Report Reminder - February 2021

Yes, will do. > On Jan 31, 2021, at 2:14 PM, kishore g wrote: > >  > Mayank can you please help with this.. > >> On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 1:59 PM Felix Cheung >> wrote: >> Reminder >> >> >> From: jmcl...@apache.org >> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2021 10:20:06 PM >> To:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.6.0 RC1

+1 Verified using steps described at: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/PINOT/Validating+a+release+candidate On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 3:48 PM Jialiang Li wrote: > Hi Pinot Community, > > This is a call for vote to the release Apache Pinot (incubating) version > 0.6.0. > > The release

Re: Podling Pinot Report Reminder - November 2020

Hello, I had updated Pinot section of the wiki page. Is there any other action required to complete the report? Thanks, Mayank From: jmcl...@apache.org Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2020 9:35 PM To: d...@pinot.incubator.apache.org Subject: Podling Pinot Report

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.6.0 RC0

Yupeng, were you able to run mvn clean install -Pbin-dist​? I ran into build issues while signing of release for the spark connector. Jack has a PR on fixing that. Thanks, Mayank From: Yupeng Fu Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2020 8:28 PM To: dev@pinot.apache.org

Re: Podling Pinot Report Reminder - November 2020

I have updated the podling report for Apache Pinot. PPMC's/committers please take a look in case anything is missed. Thanks, Mayank From: Felix Cheung Sent: Sunday, November 1, 2020 11:39 AM To: dev@pinot.apache.org ; d...@pinot.incubator.apache.org Subject:

Re: Podling Pinot Report Reminder - November 2020

Apologies for the delay, I'll complete this as soon as possible. Regards, Mayank From: Felix Cheung Sent: Sunday, November 1, 2020 11:39 AM To: dev@pinot.apache.org ; d...@pinot.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Podling Pinot Report Reminder - November 2020

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.5.0 RC1

+1 On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 1:19 AM H wrote: > +1 > > On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 10:05 AM kishore g wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 2:21 PM Ting Chen wrote: >> >>> Hi Pinot Community, >>> >>> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Pinot (incubating) version >>> 0.5.0. >>> >>>

Re: [Vote] Enabling html for Pinot related mailing lists

+1 > On Jun 13, 2020, at 8:01 PM, Seunghyun Lee wrote: > > Hi all, > > While I was working on setting up the daily digest from slack channels, I > found that the html rendering feature is turned off by default for Pinot > mailing list. > > I tried to request to enable the feature from >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.4.0 RC2

+1 Went over the checklist in the doc below:

Re: Preparing for the upcoming Pinot 0.4.0 release

I am done with the initial implementation of ThetaSketch, the last commit happened yesterday. Cheers, Mayank From: Mayank Shrivastava Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 10:33 AM To: dev@pinot.apache.org Subject: Re: Preparing for the upcoming Pinot 0.4.0 release

Re: Preparing for the upcoming Pinot 0.4.0 release

While ThetaSketch major checkins have gone in, I am still working on making it work end to end. Will update on progress by EoD tomorrow. Thanks, Mayank From: H Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 9:23 PM To: dev@pinot.apache.org Subject: Re: Preparing for the upcoming

Re: Preconditions, Annotations, Exceptions, Nulls, and Optionals

Hi Charlie, Thanks for taking the initiative on this one. My recommendation would be to document all such areas, and then open it up for consensus on the convention to follow. I think @Jackie Jiang has done similar cleanup in the past (specific to Nonnull vs

Re: Issue: Data-inconsistency during segment push

and use the entry in routingInfo - to come up with time boundary for APPEND use case - use the version number for refresh use case to change to a newer version. Append and Refresh use cases use different routing table provider implementations. On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 6:20 AM Mayank Shrivastava

Re: Apache Pinot Docs repo name

I get a 404 for these links. From: Xiang Fu Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 10:18 AM To: dev@pinot.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache Pinot Docs repo name How about

Re: Apache Pinot Docs repo name

pinot-docs lgtm. -mayank From: kishore g Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 10:16 AM To: dev@pinot.apache.org Subject: Apache Pinot Docs repo name Hi, I am creating a new repo for pinot docs. Any preference on the name? pinot-docs? thanks, Kishore G

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.3.0 RC2

+1 On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 2:09 AM Fu Xiang wrote: > Hi Pinot Community, > > This is a call for vote to the release Apache Pinot (incubating) version > 0.3.0. > > The release candidate: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/pinot/apache-pinot-incubating-0.3.0-rc2 > > Git tag for

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.3.0 RC1

+1 On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 1:25 PM Subbu Subramaniam wrote: > +1 > > -Subbu > > On 2020/03/09 18:29:43, Fu Xiang wrote: > > Hi Pinot Community, > > > > This is a call for vote to the release Apache Pinot (incubating) version > > 0.3.0. > > > > The release candidate: > > >

Re: Pinot-incubator question about unofficial publications

SGTM On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 10:48 AM kishore g wrote: > I am also ok with this. > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 10:46 AM Subbu Subramaniam > wrote: > > > No concerns. > > > > -Subbu > > > > On 2020/03/03 22:52:08, kishore g wrote: > > > This looks good to me. Adding dev to see if others have any

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.3.0 RC0

+1 On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 12:15 PM Neha Pawar wrote: > +1 > > > > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 12:16 AM Siddharth Teotia > wrote: > > > Running on Mac (Catalina 10.15.2) with JDK 8 > > > > From: Xiang Fu > > Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2020 12:08 AM > > To:

Re: Jepsen testing for Pinot

Agree on the derived systems part. One thing to explore though would be if this can be applied to the real-time segment commit protocol. Cheers, Mayank Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 24, 2020, at 1:17 PM, kishore g wrote: > > We should define a new set of tests for derived systems > >> On

Re: Remove index from segment

+1 on the idea. Curious though, how often do you see the index being removed from table config? It has been a rare event in my experience thus far. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 11, 2020, at 2:37 PM, kishore g wrote: > > Currently, we only support adding indices to the pinot segment. If the >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.2.0 RC0

+1 From: Subbu Subramaniam Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 1:41 PM To: dev@pinot.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.2.0 RC0 Hi Pinot Community, This is a call for vote to the release Apache Pinot (incubating) version 0.2.0. The release

Re: Pinot web console

+1, seems quite useful. From: kishore g Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2019 10:13 AM To: dev@pinot.apache.org Subject: Pinot web console