Re: Completing Apache Pirk 0.1.0-incubating Release

Its done, there's only 2 steps to finalize the Release from where we left off at Voting. Here's the Release artifacts - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/pirk/ You can send out a release notice to dev@pirk and general@incubator (???) On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Ellison

Re: Completing Apache Pirk 0.1.0-incubating Release

I actually wanted to walk it through to completion as I haven't done it before and need to learn - but, if you're already nearly done, there's always next time ;) On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Joe Witt wrote: > Congrats all! > > On Aug 29, 2016 5:04 PM, "Suneel Marthi"

Re: Completing Apache Pirk 0.1.0-incubating Release

Congrats all! On Aug 29, 2016 5:04 PM, "Suneel Marthi" wrote: > I am finalizing the release now !! > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Suneel Marthi > wrote: > > > Should I go ahead and finish the release? > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > >

Re: Completing Apache Pirk 0.1.0-incubating Release

I am finalizing the release now !! On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > Should I go ahead and finish the release? > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Aug 29, 2016, at 7:05 PM, Ellison Anne Williams < > eawilliamsp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Guys, >

Completing Apache Pirk 0.1.0-incubating Release

Hi Guys, I just called the end of the vote on the IMPC - we passed - yay! (finally...) I will follow up tomorrow morning to make sure that the artifacts are in the correct location, the website is update, etc - due to prior commitments, I won't be able to tackle it tonight. Thanks! Ellison

Re: [VOTE] - Pirk 0.1.0 Release (PPMC re-vote)

Thanks, Billie! I stand corrected :) Billie Rinaldi wrote: The 72 hour voting period is a "should" not a "must" (see http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval), which I take to mean that it is acceptable to have a shorter voting period under some special conditions. On

Re: Mentors Question - IPMC Vote

+1 u can Close the Vote now. On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Billie Rinaldi wrote: > I think you can go ahead and call it. :-) > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Ellison Anne Williams < > eawilliamsp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Guys, > > > > It has been 72 hours since

Re: Mentors Question - IPMC Vote

I think you can go ahead and call it. :-) On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Ellison Anne Williams < eawilliamsp...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > It has been 72 hours since the IMPC vote was called and we have four +1 > votes (and no 0 or -1 votes). Are we good to call the vote done or should >

Mentors Question - IPMC Vote

Hi Guys, It has been 72 hours since the IMPC vote was called and we have four +1 votes (and no 0 or -1 votes). Are we good to call the vote done or should we wait another 24 hours? Happy to wait and call it tomorrow morning. Thanks! Ellison Anne

Re: [VOTE] - Pirk 0.1.0 Release (PPMC re-vote)

The 72 hour voting period is a "should" not a "must" (see http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval), which I take to mean that it is acceptable to have a shorter voting period under some special conditions. On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Josh Elser

Re: Wiki permissions?

Thanks, Tim! Tim Ellison wrote: On 23/08/16 17:42, Josh Elser wrote: Oh, either it doesn't list yourself as an admin when you look at it, or you goofed adding me, Joe :) I see Tim and Joe in the list, but don't see myself (or the ability to add Suneel). Your admin bit was not set Josh. So

Re: [VOTE] - Pirk 0.1.0 Release (PPMC re-vote)

Ellison Anne Williams wrote: Hi, This is the vote for release 0.1.0 of Apache Pirk (incubating); it is a source-only release (no binary artifacts). We have to re-vote after correcting the crypto export issues that IMPC members found. As this vote reflects our crypto export corrections to our

[GitHub] incubator-pirk pull request #74: [PIRK-4] Add Streaming Implementation for A...

Github user clharris closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-pirk/pull/74 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the