Re: [VOTE] - Pirk 0.1.0 Release (PPMC re-vote)

Thanks, Billie! I stand corrected :) Billie Rinaldi wrote: The 72 hour voting period is a "should" not a "must" (see http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval), which I take to mean that it is acceptable to have a shorter voting period under some special conditions. On

Re: [VOTE] - Pirk 0.1.0 Release (PPMC re-vote)

The 72 hour voting period is a "should" not a "must" (see http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval), which I take to mean that it is acceptable to have a shorter voting period under some special conditions. On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Josh Elser

Re: [VOTE] - Pirk 0.1.0 Release (PPMC re-vote)

Ellison Anne Williams wrote: Hi, This is the vote for release 0.1.0 of Apache Pirk (incubating); it is a source-only release (no binary artifacts). We have to re-vote after correcting the crypto export issues that IMPC members found. As this vote reflects our crypto export corrections to our

Re: [VOTE] - Pirk 0.1.0 Release (PPMC re-vote)

As we have three +1 (binding) votes, this re-vote is now closed. I will submit the vote again to general@incubator. Thanks! On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 6:08 AM, Tim Ellison wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Regards, > Tim > > On 25/08/16 17:23, Ellison Anne Williams wrote: > > Hi, >

Re: [VOTE] - Pirk 0.1.0 Release (PPMC re-vote)

+1 (binding) Regards, Tim On 25/08/16 17:23, Ellison Anne Williams wrote: > Hi, > > This is the vote for release 0.1.0 of Apache Pirk (incubating); it is a > source-only release (no binary artifacts). We have to re-vote after > correcting the crypto export issues that IMPC members found. > >

Re: [VOTE] - Pirk 0.1.0 Release (PPMC re-vote)

Nope, that should be fine. On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:45 AM, Walter Ray-Dulany wrote: > Does it matter that this release candidate is at > https://org/apache/pirk/pirk/ > instead of ...org/apache/pirk/apache-pirk/ like the last candidate > was? > > Walter > > On

Re: [VOTE] - Pirk 0.1.0 Release (PPMC re-vote)

Does it matter that this release candidate is at https://org/apache/pirk/pirk/ instead of ...org/apache/pirk/apache-pirk/ like the last candidate was? Walter On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Tim Ellison wrote: > On 25/08/16 17:23, Ellison Anne Williams wrote:

Re: [VOTE] - Pirk 0.1.0 Release (PPMC re-vote)

+1 (binding) - Verified SHA1, MD5, and signature for artifact - Checked L files - all reflect source-only - Successfully built the code and ran the tests - RAT checks pass - Export information contained in README On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > I

Re: [VOTE] - Pirk 0.1.0 Release (PPMC re-vote)

+1 binding 1. Verified the ReadMe for Export controls 2. Verified Hashs and Sigs 3. RAT check passes 4. Clean build from Source and all tests pass On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Ellison Anne Williams < eawilliamsp...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > This is the vote for release 0.1.0 of Apache

Re: [VOTE] - Pirk 0.1.0 Release (PPMC re-vote)

I think we shuld close the vote once we hit a quorum of 3 +1 (binding) votes. On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Ellison Anne Williams < eawilliamsp...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > This is the vote for release 0.1.0 of Apache Pirk (incubating); it is a > source-only release (no binary artifacts).