Create a doclet for WTKX (BXML)
---
Key: PIVOT-530
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIVOT-530
Project: Pivot
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: wtk-wtkx
Reporter: Greg Brown
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIVOT-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12878817#action_12878817
]
Greg Brown commented on PIVOT-524:
--
Be sure to add Javadoc to document the default property
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIVOT-520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Brown resolved PIVOT-520.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> add a name property to Component
>
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIVOT-529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Brown resolved PIVOT-529.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Allow attached properties to be specified using elements in WTKX
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIVOT-527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Brown updated PIVOT-527:
-
Summary: add getCurrentElement() to WTKXSerializer (was: add
getEnclosingObject() to the serializer to su
>> Could you use the Action API here?
>
>>
> Will check. Don't think so for these use-cases.
Could you explain why? Based on what you have described, it seems like it might
be a natural fit.
>>> I am putting a
>>> cross-cutting concern into the Component's scope and allowing it to
>>> initial
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIVOT-528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12878771#action_12878771
]
Greg Brown commented on PIVOT-528:
--
Yes. See the above example, which adds an instance of M
Files with a .wtkx extension will still work fine. However, the "wtkx"
namespace prefix will change to "bxml", the annotation will change to @BXML,
and the serializer will change to BeanSerializer, so for consistency I think
we'd want to recommend changing the file extension as well.
Greg
On J
Hi
I don't have a problem with the version numbering, but is there any
reason why you can't continue to support the WTKX extension for
backwards compatibility?
-- Noel
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 02:13, Greg Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd really like to refactor WTKXSerializer to BeanSerializer and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIVOT-528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12878655#action_12878655
]
Appddevvv commented on PIVOT-528:
-
Does this fix allow me to specify the contents of a user
Decorator works! At least in the early tests. See my comments with >>>
Thanks! I'll test creating a map using elements (for the user data). That
would finish all the use cases out.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Brown [mailto:gkbr...@mac.com]
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 8:34 AM
To: dev@p
> - Explain exactly what it is you are trying to do in as few sentences as
> possible.
>
>>
>> Create reusable behaviors with minimalistic API and usage requirements.
Could you use the Action API here?
>> I am putting a
>> cross-cutting concern into the Component's scope and allowing it to
>> i
12 matches
Mail list logo