Hi Julian,
I just double checked and created some more variables. Seems you are correct
and the naming in the address only refers to the size of the data-element
referenced.
So both a DINT and a REAL consume 4 bytes in memory and therefore both are
called something DBW2 ... wonder where TIA
Hey Chris,
this is an excellent idea and will make it a lot easier to translate TIA
programs to Plc4X code as it makes this really copy and paste (and of course we
know Hurz).
We also had a look into TIA and it seems that the D stands for Double Word
(i.e. 4 Bytes) and the B for single
JulianFeinauer commented on issue #10: Fixed NPE in S7PlcConnection#close.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-plc4x/pull/10#issuecomment-410172284
@chrisdutz I guess due to my partial scala background I totally ignore Javas
Completable futures as superior and thus didnt think about
chrisdutz commented on issue #10: Fixed NPE in S7PlcConnection#close.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-plc4x/pull/10#issuecomment-410171496
And I don't agree with Sebastians assumption. Even if it might be the same
thread when running in unit-tests (Here we have to write the
chrisdutz commented on issue #10: Fixed NPE in S7PlcConnection#close.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-plc4x/pull/10#issuecomment-410170620
Ok ... so I just checked in the version I was talking about. It is basically
structurally equal to the way we are doing things in the
