[BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [494]'

BUILD-STABLE: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [494]': Is back to normal.

Re: Switch to from assembly to shade plugin for building Uber-jars?

So I'm having a strange problem with the maven-shade-plugin. As soon as I configure it to run, the apache-rat-plugin fails mentioning every binary file in "TARGET" missing the Apache Header :-/ This really sucks. Chris Am 28.08.19, 10:12 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" : That's just cause you

Re: TriggeredScraper naming convetion violated

And I thought Henning Wehn was the only German comedian! On August 27, 2019 at 09:43:17, Julian Feinauer ( j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de) wrote: : > Am 27.08.19, 15:39 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" : Oh wow ... you never stop learning. I have to remember this ... it fixes compile errors if you

Re: Switch to from assembly to shade plugin for building Uber-jars?

That's just cause you are a shady person :-P Chris Am 28.08.19, 09:58 schrieb "Sebastian Rühl" : Hi Chris, My experience is the other way around: shade over assembly. So from my side go for it +1 Sebastian > Am 28.08.2019 um 09:56 schrieb Christofer

Re: Switch to from assembly to shade plugin for building Uber-jars?

Hi Chris, My experience is the other way around: shade over assembly. So from my side go for it +1 Sebastian > Am 28.08.2019 um 09:56 schrieb Christofer Dutz : > > Hi all, > > you know we were having problems in the past with the assembly of the no-deps > artifacts. > We solved this by

Re: [DISCUSS] Integrate CRUNCH into PLC4X

LGTM so +1 from my side for integration (after solving Ottos proposed TODOs)