Hi all,
Sadly, I decided to cancel the VOTE due to two reasons.
First off, there were minor issues (as pointed our by Justin, thanks!).
Second, we also observed a socket leak issue on Linux with the RC which is
fixed in the meantime.
Thus, I think its better to prepare a clean and bug-free RC3 f
+1 (binding)
Lukas
Checked on Ubuntu 19.10 with openjdk 11.0.6:
- Downloads using tooling: OK
- Checksum matches: OK
- Signature matches: OK
- Signed by apache email: OK
- Unpacks: OK
- Existence of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES: OK
- README and RELEASE_NOTES match those staged alongside
Hi Justin,
thanks for your vote and the pointer we indeed missed.
I will discuss the issues with Chris who did the implementation and then come
back to the list and see how we proceed.
It should not be a big issue as we already use Milo since several releases. But
I will check in deep!
Julian
Hi,
Sorry but’s it -1 due to license. notice and licensing issues. May need a
little discussion to sort out.
I checked:
- signatures and checksum fine
- NOTICE mentions “This product includes software developed at The Milo
project (https://github.com/eclipse/milo).” Why is this here? What cod
+1 (binding)
Chris
Checked on MacOS with OpenJDK 13:
- Downloads using tooling: OK
- Checksum matches: OK
- Signature matches: OK
- Signed by apache email: OK
- Unpacks: OK
- Existence of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES: OK
- README and RELEASE_NOTES match those staged alongside the source
Hey folks,
its release time again!
As discussed on multiple occasions, the 0.6 release branch will be a „LTS“
release of the „old fashioned“ or „hand written“ drivers.
The develop will be the 0.7.0 branch and will contain the generated drivers.
Please check the RELEASE_NOTES for all details.
---
