GitHub user dkcm opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/32
A faster IRR
Speed up computation by replacing Math.pow() with multiplication.
Essentially refactoring, so existing tests suffice.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$
Github user dkcm closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/31
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled
GitHub user dkcm opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/31
A faster IRR
Speed up computation by replacing Math.pow() with multiplication.
Essentially refactoring, so existing tests suffice.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
Thanks for the the update. Patching or fixing the synchronization in
xmlbeans is an interesting idea. I haven't thought about that. I'll see
if there is something that can be done for this in the xmlbeans code...
Kai
Am 2016-02-19 18:11, schrieb Nick Burch:
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016,
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016, nos...@kaigrabfelder.de wrote:
I'm wondering if there are any activities or plans for replacing
xmlbeans with something else. I'm asking a) because the xmlbeans is
retired and b) it has some issues in regards to memory usage and more
important scalability.
Projects can
Hi Kai,
I'm working on it ... or at least fiddling around with JAXB in the
unimportant parts of POI
like the xml signature classes.
My plan is to evaluate how JAXB binder vs. xmlbeans works out.
If it's ok for the signature stuff - which is very picky when it comes to
namespaces and
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53191
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Problems with line style|Problems
Hi there,
I'm wondering if there are any activities or plans for replacing
xmlbeans with something else. I'm asking a) because the xmlbeans is
retired and b) it has some issues in regards to memory usage and more
important scalability.
As mentioned here
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59030
Tim Allison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58963
Kai G changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56469
sperl.si...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33570|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56469
sperl.si...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--
You are receiving this
Hi,
I tried to do timing-based tests in various project but never could get it
stable.
If you try to set the allowed time long enough, there will always be a
slower machine somewhere out there. If you set it very long, the check on
runtime becomes useless at some point.
If you try to measure
13 matches
Mail list logo