+1
Thanks for putting this together.
Cheers,
Marius
> On May 22, 2024, at 12:26, PJ Fanning wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've prepared artifacts for the release of Apache XmlBeans 5.2.1 (RC1). This
> is built with Java 8.
>
> This is a bug fix and dependency upgrade release.
>
>
> A
Hello,
We do use POI with Java 8. We deploy to customer environments where we don’t
have a strong say in the runtime version. We do NOT think POI needs to support
Java 8 in the next version.
Cheers,
Marius
> On Feb 25, 2024, at 08:03, Dominik Stadler
> wrote:
>
> So I see two +1 and one
+1 for removing them. Maven downloads, even if not using a Maven-aware build
tool, feels like a very reasonable option.
Cheers,
Marius
> On Feb 25, 2023, at 09:37, PJ Fanning wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> The ASF only requires that we do src distributions for releases. We also
> publish our
+1 from me. Thanks for preparing the release!
Cheers,
Marius
> On Sep 9, 2022, at 16:51, PJ Fanning wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> The Apache POI project is pleased to announce the release of POI 5.2.3.
> Featured are a handful of new areas of functionality, and numerous bug fixes.
>
> See
I don’t know the reasoning behind why we don’t need to bring in the module name
for curvesapi, but curvesapi should get an automatic module name assigned by
the JVM when it gets put on the modulepath, even if it doesn’t define a
preferred Automatic-Module-Name.
As for making it optional -
Dominik's understanding mirrors mine. I just added the updated docs for
logging configs, and I'll take a look at adding something about transitive
dependencies as well.
--
Cheers,
Marius Volkhart
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 1:48 AM Dominik Stadler
wrote:
> On Logging dependencies: As far a
+1
Thank you for the many hours spent on fixing, triaging, responding, and
releasing.
Cheers,
Marius
> On Jan 7, 2022, at 03:44, PJ Fanning wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've prepared artifacts for the release of Apache POI 5.2.0 (RC2).
>
>
> The most notable changes in this release are:
modularizing a project with it.
--
Cheers,
Marius Volkhart
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 9:30 PM Andreas Beeker wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> since a few days / every now and then I try to get into our gradle build,
> but I have some problems, because I somehow try to start big (with the
>
Hi PJ,
It looks like the changes to POIFSStream from r1887657 are the cause. Those
didn't get reverted in r1887660. When I revert those, the tests pass again.
--
Cheers,
Marius
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021, 02:01 fannin...@apache.org
wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm at a bit of a loss as to why this failure has
+1
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021, 01:04 fannin...@apache.org
wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday 3 March 2021, 23:58:38 GMT, Andreas Beeker <
> kiwiwi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Devs,
>
> as our POI build has some problems, I would at least try to make XmlBeans
> available via maven.org.
>
>
that is confusing or missing.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65153
--
Cheers,
Marius Volkhart
Hello,
I think I'm running into a reported deadlock in Ant when running the
integration tests with the Log4J logging code.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64733
When I include either of the legacy result listeners, Ant hangs. When I
remove them however, everything passes. This
+1 for 5.0.1 from me.
--
Cheers,
Marius Volkhart
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 10:36 PM Andreas Beeker
wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> when are we ready for POI 5.0.1?
>
> ... until then I'll continue fixing sonar issues.
>
> I'll try to fix the "Constant names should comply
+1 for b + e
+1 for logging changes not holding up 5.0.1
I'll happily do the work, including appropriate changes to the docs on the
website.
--
Cheers,
Marius Volkhart
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 8:21 AM Dominik Stadler
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 for a 5.0.1 first, there were already a f
, and if there's a specific timeline
you'd like them on, I can probably accommodate it.
--
Cheers,
Marius Volkhart
On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 2:43 PM fannin...@apache.org
wrote:
> The POILogger is actually a reasonably good implementation.
>
> default void log(int level, Objec
to HSSFPictureData, but I haven't thought much about it.
Any thoughts, particularly around whether or not such a change is of
interest, are most welcome.
--
Cheers,
Marius Volkhart
I started with a prototype of this and annotated a single package, so we
could see what this would look like. Changes with commentary available at
https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/203
On 2020/12/05 12:33:19, Marius Volkhart wrote:
> Yes, I do not think this should hold up a release. It
ommons Logging dependency
- Add Log4J API dependency
- Remove POILogger API
- Remove POILogFactory API
- Modify all log sites to use Log4J API
- Write new documentation for how POI submits events
--
Cheers,
Marius Volkhart
.0.0 release because it is a while since
> we did any releases. I'd prefer not to delay a release for this. We could
> certainly consider it after the next release.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday 2 December 2020, 22:37:46 GMT, Marius Volkhart
> wrote:
>
>
>
not
complete it. Again, if the contribution is of interest, I can go into more
details of a plan for anyone interested.
--
Cheers,
Marius Volkhart
Hello,
I wanted to submit a change for the website (poi.apache.org) but I can't
seem to find the files for the documentation. I found them at the last 2.x
branch tag.
Any information you could provide on how to go about patching the website
would helpful!
--
Cheers,
Marius Volkhart
21 matches
Mail list logo
