Re: Remove OPOIFSFileSystem for 4.0.0?

2018-08-27 Thread Andreas Beeker
After test-removing/renaming the classes, I'm also +1 for unifying to POIFS. The current version still contains so many (bloat/) not anymore necessary classes and its actually fun, to remove one after another and it still works :) ... of course I try to rewrite the tests where it makes sense. And

Re: Remove OPOIFSFileSystem for 4.0.0?

2018-08-27 Thread Greg Woolsey
3->4 is already a big upgrade, with lots of other API changes (all the Enums, for example). I think the direct use of NPOIFS will be small, and one more easy renaming migration step isn't that bad. I'd rather not keep even deprecated classes around longer than necessary. On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at

Re: Remove OPOIFSFileSystem for 4.0.0?

2018-08-27 Thread Tim Allison
v@poi.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Remove OPOIFSFileSystem for 4.0.0? > > After OPOIFS* is now removed, should I rename/normalize/refactor NPOIFS* to > POIFS*? > > Andi > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsu

Re: Remove OPOIFSFileSystem for 4.0.0?

2018-08-27 Thread pj.fanning
I'd prefer if we rename the NPOIFS classes to POIFS but also keep deprecated NPOIFS subclasses to reduce the impact on users who will be upgrading from POI 3 to 4. -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html ---

Re: Remove OPOIFSFileSystem for 4.0.0?

2018-08-27 Thread Alain FAGOT BÉAREZ
+1 for full refactoring to POIFS* ⁣Gesendet mit BlueMail ​ Originale Nachricht Von: Andreas Beeker Gesendet: Sun Aug 26 19:06:02 GMT-03:00 2018 An: dev@poi.apache.org Betreff: Re: Remove OPOIFSFileSystem for 4.0.0? After OPOIFS* is now removed, should I rename/normalize

Re: Remove OPOIFSFileSystem for 4.0.0?

2018-08-26 Thread Andreas Beeker
After OPOIFS* is now removed, should I rename/normalize/refactor NPOIFS* to POIFS*? Andi signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Remove OPOIFSFileSystem for 4.0.0?

2018-08-14 Thread kiwiwings
Javen O'Neal-2 wrote > How many lines of code can we delete by removing this class? Quite a few ... The issue came to my mind, as I've had a look into #61677 and didn't want to (try to) fix it in two areas. I've started to remove the OPOIFS* classes yesterday, but this is not so trivial as I thoug

Re: Remove OPOIFSFileSystem for 4.0.0?

2018-08-14 Thread Javen O'Neal
+1. How many lines of code can we delete by removing this class?

Re: Remove OPOIFSFileSystem for 4.0.0?

2018-08-13 Thread Alain FAGOT BÉAREZ
+1 for removal before 4.0.0 ⁣Gesendet mit BlueMail ​ Originale Nachricht Von: "pj.fanning" Gesendet: Mon Aug 13 17:54:14 GMT-03:00 2018 An: dev@poi.apache.org Betreff: Re: Remove OPOIFSFileSystem for 4.0.0? +1 for 4.0.0 change -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.

Re: Remove OPOIFSFileSystem for 4.0.0?

2018-08-13 Thread pj.fanning
+1 for 4.0.0 change -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

Remove OPOIFSFileSystem for 4.0.0?

2018-08-13 Thread Andreas Beeker
Hi, NPOIFS should be quite stable in the meantime - how about removing OPOIFSFileSystem for/before 4.0.0? Andi signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature